Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: exploring a paradox of organizational improvement

Recent evidence suggests the connection between quality improvement and financial results may be weak. Consider the case of Analog Devices, Inc., a leading manufacturer of integrated circuits. Analog's TQM program was a dramatic success. Yield doubled, cycle time was cut in half, and product defects fell by a factor of ten. However, financial performance worsened. To explore the apparent paradox we develop a detailed simulation model of Analog, including operations, financial and cost accounting, product development, human resources, the competitive environment, and the financial markets. We used econometric estimation, interviews, observation, and archival data to specify and estimate the model. We find that improvement programs like TQM can present firms with a tradeoff between short and long run effects. In the long run TQM can increase productivity, raise quality, and lower costs. In the short run, these improvements can interact with prevailing accounting systems and organizational routines to create excess capacity, financial stress, and pressure for layoffs that undercut commitment to continuous improvement. We explore policies to promote sustained improvement in financial as well as nonfinancial measures of performance.

[1]  W. A. Shewhart,et al.  Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control , 1939 .

[2]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[3]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[4]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[5]  J. Forrester.  Counterintuitive behavior of social systems , 1971 .

[6]  Roger I. Hall,et al.  A System Pathology of an Organization: The Rise and Fall of the Old Saturday Evening Post. , 1976 .

[7]  D. A. Conway,et al.  The Art of Problem Solving , 1978 .

[8]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Managerial Applications of System Dynamics , 1981 .

[9]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[10]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[11]  S. Klepper,et al.  Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations , 1982 .

[12]  G. Kreweras.  Creating the corporate future: Russell L. ACKOFF Wiley, New York, 1981, xi + 297 pages, £10.85 , 1982 .

[13]  W. Mason.  Creating the Corporate Future , 1982 .

[14]  Colin Eden,et al.  Messing about in problems , 1983 .

[15]  Roger I. Hall,et al.  A Corporate System Model of a Sports Club: Using Simulation as an Aid to Policy Making in a Crisis , 1983 .

[16]  R. Hall.  The Natural Logic of Management Policy Making: Its Implications for the Survival of an Organization , 1984 .

[17]  John D. W. Morecroft,et al.  Rationality in the Analysis of Behavioral Simulation Models , 1985 .

[18]  M. Walton.  The Deming management method , 1986 .

[19]  A. Darker,et al.  TOTAL QUALITY CONTROL , 1987 .

[20]  M. Juran,et al.  Setting Quality Goals , 1988 .

[21]  John D. W. Morecroft,et al.  System dynamics and microworlds for policymakers , 1988 .

[22]  Joseph Moses Juran.  Juran on planning for quality , 1988 .

[23]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[24]  Y. Barlas.  Multiple tests for validation of system dynamics type of simulation models , 1989 .

[25]  J. Sterman.  Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making , 1989 .

[26]  M. Beer,et al.  Why change programs don't produce change. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[27]  Eric F. Wolstenholme,et al.  System Enquiry: A System Dynamics Approach , 1990 .

[28]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory , 1991 .

[29]  D. Mccormick.  Normal Accidents , 1991, Bio/Technology.

[30]  Workers and managers of the world, unite! , 1991 .

[31]  Workers and managers of the world, unite! , 1991, Business and health.

[32]  Corporate style , 1991 .

[33]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach , 1991 .

[34]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[35]  R. Schaffer,et al.  Successful change programs begin with results. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[36]  J. Sterman,et al.  Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future , 1992 .

[37]  Schaffer Rh,et al.  Successful change programs begin with results. , 1992 .

[38]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management: Practices and Results in Fortune 1000 Companies , 1992 .

[39]  Theresa K. Lant,et al.  Aspiration Level Adaptation: An Empirical Exploration , 1992 .

[40]  Mark Paich,et al.  Boom, bust, and failures to learn in experimental markets , 1993 .

[41]  Daniel H. Kim,et al.  A framework and methodology for linking individual and organizational learning : applications in TQM and product development , 1993 .

[42]  Gary W. Burchill,et al.  Concept Engineering: An Investigation Of TIME versus Market Orientation in Product Concept Development , 1993 .

[43]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  The Transformation of American Industrial Relations , 1988 .

[44]  Ruth Milkman,et al.  The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States. , 1993 .

[45]  Thomas H. Lee,et al.  A New American Tqm: Four Practical Revolutions In Management , 1993 .

[46]  Peter M. Senge,et al.  Modeling For Learning Organizations , 1994 .

[47]  The case against quality , 1994 .

[48]  George. Ho,et al.  Employee involvement and total quality management : practices and results in Australian leading companies , 1995 .

[49]  M Williams,et al.  Managing Quality , 2018 .

[50]  Alfred A. Marcus,et al.  5. Playing the Maintenance Game: How Mental Models Drive Organizational Decisions , 2018, Debating Rationality.

[51]  K. Jantke.  Planning for Learning , 2020, The Power of Assessment for Learning: Twenty Years of Research and Practice in UK and US Classrooms.