Covering one eye in fixation-disparity measurement causes slight movement of fellow eye

In the subjective measurement of fixation disparity (FD), the subject fuses contours presented in the peripheral macular areas of both eyes (fusion lock). The position of the eyes relative to each other is monitored by means of two haploscopically seen vertical lines presented in the central macular area, one above and one below a binocularly seen horizontal line. The subject is instructed to shift one of the vertical lines horizontally until the two are aligned, while fixating their intersection with the horizontal line. It has recently been questioned whether the foveolae really are pointed towards the perceived intersection. In this study, we monitored the position of one eye while intermittently covering the fellow eye, while the subject maintained fixation of the intersection of the remaining vertical line and the horizontal line. We found slight differences in position of the measured eye, depending on whether the other eye was covered or not, i.e. depending on the presence or absence of fusion in the macular periphery. These differences were more pronounced in the non-dominant eye.

[1]  K N OGLE,et al.  Further considerations of fixation disparity and the binocular fusional processes. , 1951, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  C. Schor,et al.  Fixation of disparity: a steady state error of disparity-induced vergence. , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[3]  C. Schor,et al.  Combined effects of spatial frequency and retinal eccentricity upon fixation disparity. , 1986, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[4]  K. N. Ogle,et al.  Fixation disparity and the fusional processes in binocular single vision. , 1949, American journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  P. Buisseret,et al.  Area centralis position relative to the optic disc projection in kittens as a function of age. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  Frederick W. Hebbard,et al.  Comparison of Subjective and Objective Measurements of Fixation Disparity , 1962 .

[7]  P. Panum Physiologische Untersuchungen über das Sehen mit zwei Augen , 1858 .

[8]  A. Jampolsky Esotropia and Convergent Fixation Disparity , 1956 .

[9]  D. Pestalozzi Über die Behandlung von heterophoren Legasthenikern mit Fixationsdisparation mittels Prismenvollkorrektion , 1986 .

[10]  Kenneth N. Ogle,et al.  Oculomotor imbalance in binocular vision and fixation disparity , 1968 .

[11]  K. N. Ogle Researches in binocular vision. , 1950 .

[12]  M. Dubin,et al.  Non‐uniform postnatal growth of the cat retina , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  Clifton M. Schor,et al.  The influence of rapid prism adaptation upon fixation disparity , 1979, Vision Research.

[14]  Simultaneous investigation of fixation disparity stereothreshold and horopter balance , 1978, Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie.

[15]  Andrew E. Kertesz,et al.  The nature of sensory compensation during fusional response , 1988, Vision Research.

[16]  E A Palmer,et al.  The relationship between fixation disparity and heterophoria. , 1978, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  D. R. Hampton,et al.  The unreliability of nonius line estimates of vertical fusional vergence performance , 1983, Vision Research.

[18]  D. B. Carter Studies in fixation disparity. 3. The apparent uniocular components of fixation disparity. , 1960, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  A JAMPOLSKY,et al.  Fixation disparity in relation to heterophoria. , 1957, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  L. Bour,et al.  The Double Magnetic Induction Method for Measuring Eye Movement - Results in Monkey and Man , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.