Comparisons of inter-domain routing schemes for heterogeneous ad hoc networks

We propose three inter-domain routing schemes for ad hoc networks, namely the implicit foreign degree based protocol (IFD), the explicit locally optimal protocol (ELO) and the explicit limited scope protocol (ELS). We studied the performance of these different schemes. Our simulation studies reveal that the explicit schemes can achieve high packet delivery ratio and good average end-to-end delay at a lower overhead cost compared to IFD. We also compared our approaches with LANMAR, an existing scalable routing protocol for ad hoc networks. The results show that our approach outperforms LANMAR in terms of the packet delivery ratio and control overhead, while maintaining comparable end-to-end delay at low and medium mobility rate (less than 8 m/s).

[1]  Mustafa Ergen,et al.  MEWLANA-mobile IP enriched wireless local area network architecture , 2002, Proceedings IEEE 56th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[2]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[3]  Mario Gerla,et al.  A heterogeneous routing protocol based on a new stable clustering scheme , 2002, MILCOM 2002. Proceedings.

[4]  David A. Maltz,et al.  Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1994, Mobidata.

[5]  Mario Gerla,et al.  GloMoSim: A Scalable Network Simulation Environment , 2002 .

[6]  Mario Gerla Landmark Routing Protocol (LANMAR) for Large Scale Ad Hoc Networks , 2002 .

[7]  Xiaoyan Hong,et al.  A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks , 1999, MSWiM '99.

[8]  Baochun Li,et al.  Group mobility and partition prediction in wireless ad-hoc networks , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[9]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Internet Connectivity for Ad Hoc Mobile Networks , 2002, Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Networks.