Bridging the Gap Between Media Synchronicity and Task Performance

The study examines effects of media synchronicity in a group problem-solving task. The media characteristics of parallelism, immediacy of feedback, and reprocessability are varied within text-based computer-mediated communication. The hidden profile task requires groups to exchange unshared pieces of information and to integrate them. Contrary to expectations, asynchronous media characteristics do not support the production of unshared information. Furthermore, asynchronous media characteristics result in higher engagement in integrating information during discussion. Asynchronous media characteristics decrease the coherence of the discourse and increase the mental effort of the participants. Since coherence and mental effort indicate that asynchronous media characteristics impede the information integration process, the higher engagement in information integration is interpreted as compensatory effort.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[2]  David Dryden Henningsen,et al.  The Impact of Directive Leadership on Group Information Sampling, Decisions, and Perceptions of the Leader , 1999 .

[3]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[4]  A. Anderson,et al.  The Effects of Visibility on Dialogue and Performance in a Cooperative Problem Solving Task , 1994 .

[5]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm , 2004 .

[6]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  How Much Bandwidth Is Enough? A Longitudinal Examination of Media Characteristics and Group Outcomes , 1999, MIS Q..

[7]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[8]  H. Guetzkow.  Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data , 1950 .

[9]  J. Valacich,et al.  Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. , 1993 .

[10]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can't Make It Think , 1996, MIS Q..

[11]  Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon,et al.  The Reliability of a Dialogue Structure Coding Scheme , 1997, CL.

[12]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action , 2000, CSCW '00.

[13]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[14]  Brian K. Smith,et al.  Fugue: a computer mediated conversational system that supports turn negotiation , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[16]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[17]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[18]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[20]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Contributing to Discourse , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[22]  C. Werry.  Linguistic and interactional features of Internet relay chat , 1996 .

[23]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Effects of Media and Task on User Performance: A Test of the Task-Media Fit Hypothesis , 2000 .

[24]  T. Levine,et al.  Eta Squared, Partial Eta Squared, and Misreporting of Effect Size in Communication Research , 2002 .

[25]  Stefan Münzer,et al.  Computer‐mediated communication: synchronicity and compensatory effort , 2008 .

[26]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science. , 1989 .

[27]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  R. Brent Gallupe,et al.  Blocking electronic brainstorms. , 1994 .

[29]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Introducing instant messaging and chat in the workplace , 2002, CHI.

[30]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Interactional coherence in CMC , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[31]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  Groups, Technology, and Time , 2002 .

[32]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Reevaluating media richness: cues, feedback, and task , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[33]  Eva Böing-Messing,et al.  Transaktives Gedächtnis, Informationsintegration und Entscheidungsfindung im Medienvergleich , 2003, Z. für Medienpsychologie.

[34]  R. Rice.  Task Analyzability, Use of New Media, and Effectiveness: A Multi-Site Exploration of Media Richness , 1992 .

[35]  B. Baltes,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[36]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Language Use in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Role of Coordination Devices , 2001 .

[37]  Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon,et al.  Face-to-face and video mediated communication: a comparison of dialogue structure and task performance , 1997 .

[38]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[39]  D. Leutner,et al.  Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[40]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  The Effect of Medium and Task on Dyadic Communication , 1992, ICIS.

[41]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[42]  J. Valacich,et al.  Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story , 1994 .

[43]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[44]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  Adapting communicative strategies to computer mediated communication: an analysis of task performance and dialogue structure , 2003 .

[45]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  The adoption and use of BABBLE: A field study of chat in the workplace , 1999, ECSCW.

[46]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Cautionary Note on Reporting Eta-Squared Values from Multifactor ANOVA Designs , 2004 .

[47]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Introducing chat into business organizations: toward an instant messaging maturity model , 2003, GROUP '03.

[48]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.