Active Vibration Control of Seismically Excited Building Structures by Upgraded Grey Wolf Optimizer

In recent decades, active vibration control of buildings for earthquake-induced damage mitigation has been widely considered in the scientific literature. Model-free controllers using human knowledge-based fuzzy logic rules were shown to be advantageous over conventional model-based controllers as their effectiveness is not limited by the accuracy of the structural modelling of buildings. The latter becomes challenging in view of nonlinear building response under severe seismic excitations and uncertainties to the structural properties at the time of the seismic event. Nevertheless, the specification of fuzzy logic controllers (FLCs) relying only on expert knowledge may not result in optimal control response. At the same time, the pursue of optimizing fuzzy logic control rules based on excitation and structural response data, beyond human expert knowledge, is not straightforward as it increases considerably the scale of the optimal FLC design problem. To this end, this paper puts forth an enhanced version of the Upgraded Grey Wolf Optimizer (UGWO) to optimally design membership functions and rule bases of FLC to minimize seismic structural damage. The latter is defined in terms of maximum curvature ductility ratio at the ends of structural members. The potential of the UGWO is demonstrated by considering FLC-based optimal seismic active control in a 20-story steel benchmark structure with nonlinear behavior involving more than 400 design variables. The performance of the UGWO is gauged by examining nine different structural performance metrics and compared to results of 5 different widely used state-of-art metaheuristic optimization algorithms including the standard Grey Wolf Optimizer. Comparisons demonstrate the capability of UGWO to provide improved seismic performance, resulting in reduced structural responses and damages for the considered benchmark structure.

[1]  Lucia Faravelli,et al.  Use of Adaptive Networks in Fuzzy Control of Civil Structures , 1996 .

[2]  Siamak Talatahari,et al.  Tribe–charged system search for parameter configuration of nonlinear systems with large search domains , 2021 .

[3]  Mahdi Azizi,et al.  Atomic orbital search: A novel metaheuristic algorithm , 2021 .

[4]  Rabindra Kumar Sahu,et al.  A novel modified differential evolution algorithm optimized fuzzy proportional integral derivative controller for load frequency control with thyristor controlled series compensator , 2018, Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology.

[5]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  A compressive MUSIC spectral approach for identification of closely-spaced structural natural frequencies and post-earthquake damage detection , 2020 .

[6]  Hamid Boubertakh Knowledge-based ant colony optimization method to design fuzzy proportional integral derivative controllers , 2017 .

[7]  Sidhartha Panda,et al.  Improved grey wolf optimization technique for fuzzy aided PID controller design for power system frequency control , 2018, Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks.

[8]  Nathan M. Newmark,et al.  A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics , 1959 .

[9]  M. Malekpour,et al.  A new inertia emulator and fuzzy-based LFC to support inertial and governor responses using Jaya algorithm , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[10]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Optimal tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) design in wind-excited tall buildings for occupants’ comfort serviceability performance and energy harvesting , 2020, Engineering Structures.

[11]  Oscar Castillo,et al.  Interval type-2 fuzzy logic for dynamic parameter adaptation in a modified gravitational search algorithm , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[12]  Andrew Lewis,et al.  Grey Wolf Optimizer , 2014, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[13]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Optimization of Engineering Design Problems Using Atomic Orbital Search Algorithm , 2021, IEEE Access.

[14]  S.M.T Bathaee,et al.  Load Frequency Control in Interconnected Power System by Nonlinear Term and Uncertainty Considerations by Using of Harmony Search Optimization Algorithm and Fuzzy-Neural Network , 2018, Electrical Engineering (ICEE), Iranian Conference on.

[15]  Ananth Ramaswamy,et al.  Multi‐objective optimal design of FLC driven hybrid mass damper for seismically excited structures , 2002 .

[16]  D. Jahed Armaghani,et al.  Prediction of an environmental issue of mine blasting: an imperialistic competitive algorithm-based fuzzy system , 2018, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[17]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark Control Problems for Seismically Excited Nonlinear Buildings , 2004 .

[18]  Meysam Gheisarnejad,et al.  An effective hybrid harmony search and cuckoo optimization algorithm based fuzzy PID controller for load frequency control , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[19]  J Vanishree,et al.  Optimization of Size and Cost of Static VAR Compensator using Dragonfly Algorithm for Voltage Profile Improvement in Power Transmission Systems , 2018, International Journal of Renewable Energy Research.

[20]  Akinori Tani,et al.  Intelligent fuzzy optimal control of building structures , 1998 .

[21]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Eurocode-Compliant Seismic Analysis and Design of R/C Buildings: Concepts, Commentary and Worked Examples with Flowcharts , 2015 .

[22]  Richard M. Allen,et al.  Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences Earthquake Early Warning : Advances , Scientific Challenges , and Societal Needs , 2019 .

[23]  Manoj Kumar Debnath,et al.  Design of fuzzy-PID controller with derivative filter and its application using firefly algorithm to automatic generation control , 2017, 2017 6th International Conference on Computer Applications In Electrical Engineering-Recent Advances (CERA).

[24]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Cost-effectiveness in active structural control , 1998 .

[25]  J. Lodge Annual review of earth and planetary sciences , 1979 .

[26]  M. Dokainish,et al.  A survey of direct time-integration methods in computational structural dynamics—I. Explicit methods , 1989 .

[27]  Kenny C. S Kwok,et al.  Performance and Cost Evaluation of a Smart Tuned Mass Damper for Suppressing Wind-Induced Lateral-Torsional Motion of Tall Structures , 2012 .

[28]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  Fuzzy Adaptive Charged System Search for global optimization , 2021, Appl. Soft Comput..

[29]  Zhijun Li,et al.  Control methodologies for vibration control of smart civil and mechanical structures , 2018, Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..

[30]  A. Sextos,et al.  Innovations in earthquake risk reduction for resilience: Recent advances and challenges , 2021, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[31]  Satish Chand,et al.  Adaptive multipopulation genetic algorithm based self designed fuzzy logic controller for active magnetic bearing application , 2018 .

[32]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Selection and Scaling of Real Accelerograms for Bi-Directional Loading: A Review of Current Practice and Code Provisions , 2007 .

[33]  Oscar Castillo,et al.  Optimization of fuzzy controller design using a new bee colony algorithm with fuzzy dynamic parameter adaptation , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[34]  Thomas A. Runkler,et al.  Generating interpretable fuzzy controllers using particle swarm optimization and genetic programming , 2018, GECCO.

[35]  Kenny C. S Kwok,et al.  Fuzzy Controller for Seismically Excited Nonlinear Buildings , 2004 .

[36]  Siamak Talatahari,et al.  Optimization of constrained mathematical and engineering design problems using chaos game optimization , 2020, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[37]  Roger Bilham,et al.  The seismic future of cities , 2009 .

[38]  Siamak Talatahari,et al.  Optimal design of real‐size building structures using quantum‐behaved developed swarm optimizer , 2020, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings.