Product Architecture Definition: Evaluating the Potentiality of TRIZ Tools

Abstract Product Architecture definition plays more and more a crucial role for enhancing product customizability, easing after-sale management and reducing manufacturing costs. Despite major efforts have been dedicated to the development of methods and tools supporting Product Architecture definition for “Adaptive Design” tasks, no real means are available while addressing more radical innovation activities. The paper proposes a critical overview of TRIZ models and tools to evaluate their potential integration into a comprehensive methodology for Product Architecture definition. A comparison with the three major modularity methods is performed with the aim to establish how TRIZ can be located thereupon to current state of the art of Product Architecture management. An academic case study is discussed, in order to show how the OTSM Network of Problems approach can bring a significant contribution in that sense.

[1]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Product modularity: Definitions and benefits , 2003 .

[2]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  A CLASSIFICATION FRAMEWORK FOR PRODUCT MODULARIZATION METHODS , 2011 .

[3]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Identifying Modular and Integrative Systems and Their Impact on Design Team Interactions , 2003 .

[4]  G. Altshuller.  Creativity as an exact science : the theory of the solution of inventive problems , 1984 .

[5]  Denis Cavallucci,et al.  From TRIZ to OTSM-TRIZ: addressing complexity challenges in inventive design , 2007 .

[6]  Sebastian K. Fixson,et al.  Modularity and Commonality Research: Past Developments and Future Opportunities , 2007, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[7]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Approach for a modularization driven system definition using multiple domains , 2011 .

[8]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures , 2000 .

[9]  Katja Hölttä-Otto,et al.  Modular product platform design , 2005 .

[10]  Roland De Guio,et al.  A framework for OTSMTRIZ-based computer support to be used in complex problem management , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[11]  Ali K. Kamrani,et al.  Product design for modularity , 2000 .

[12]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Interrelating and prioritising requirements on multiple hierarchy levels , 2010 .

[14]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[15]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[16]  Lorenzo Fiorineschi,et al.  A Comparison of Classical TRIZ and OTSM-TRIZ in Dealing with Complex Problems , 2015 .

[17]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Product modularity: measures and design methods , 2004 .

[18]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Network Approach to Define Modularity of Components in Complex Products , 2007 .

[19]  Richard C.M. Yam,et al.  The Impact of Product Modularity on New Product Performance: Mediation by Product Innovativeness , 2011 .