Radiation balance and evaporation partitioning in a narrow-row soybean canopy

Seeding rate and row spacing of agricultural crops are managed to maximize yield but also have significant implications for energy partitioning and canopy microclimate. The objective of this study was to measure radiation budget components in a narrowrow soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] canopy, determine soil water evaporation (E) as the difference between measured evapotranspiration (ET) and plant transpiration (T), and compare measured E and T with estimates from an energy balance approach. The study was completed in a production soybean field near Ames, IA, with 350,000 plants ha � 1 in 0.38 m wide rows. The field was planted on 8 May 2004 and continuous measurements were made from 8 June to 27 September. Shortwave and longwave radiation components were measured above the canopy with hemispherical radiometers. Net all-wave and incoming and reflected shortwave radiation were measured beneath the canopy with line radiometers and downwelling longwave radiation was calculated from a radiation balance. ET was measured with an eddy covariance system and T was measured with sapflow stem gauges. On sunny days under full canopy conditions, nearly 90% of the shortwave and net radiation was attenuated by the canopy with over 80% of the available energy utilized by ET. E accounted for 8‐12% of the ETunder full canopy conditions although these percentages may be overestimates due to evaporation of dew present on the canopy. With such a large proportion of the available energy consumed by ET, fluxes of sensible heat (H) were very low and vertical temperature gradients across the soil‐canopy‐ atmosphere interface were only 2‐3 8C. A Priestley‐Taylor energy balance approach used to estimate E and T tended to underestimate E and overestimate T. The E underestimate may be due in part to E including evaporation of dew. Conversely, Twas overestimated by 25 and 14% on sunnydays under full canopy conditions even with direct measurement of Rn interception by the canopy. Use of shortwave extinction coefficients to estimate Rn interception failed to improve T estimates significantly. The high-population, narrow-row planting strategy resulted in a dense canopy that, under full canopy conditions, resulted in very little light penetration or E. Published by Elsevier B.V.

[1]  C. B. Tanner,et al.  Calibration and Field Test of Soil Heat Flux Plates1 , 1968 .

[2]  E. Kanemasu,et al.  Evapotranspiration from Soybean and Sorghum Fileds1 , 1972 .

[3]  Randy Wells,et al.  Soybean Growth Response to Plant Density: Relationships among Canopy Photosynthesis, Leaf Area, and Light Interception , 1991 .

[4]  A. Klute.  Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. , 1988 .

[5]  Tetsuo Sakuratani,et al.  Studies on Evapotranspiration from Crops , 1985 .

[6]  R. H. Shaw,et al.  Light Distribution in Field Soybean Canopies1 , 1967 .

[7]  M. J. Savage,et al.  Placement height of eddy correlation sensors above a short turfgrass surface , 1995 .

[8]  J. Heilman,et al.  Experimental Test of Density and Energy‐Balance Corrections on Carbon Dioxide Flux as Measured Using Open‐Path Eddy Covariance , 2003 .

[9]  C. B. Tanner,et al.  Estimating Evaporation and Transpiration from a Row Crop during Incomplete Cover1 , 1976 .

[10]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Microclimate in the soybean canopy , 1983 .

[11]  Gerard J. Kluitenberg,et al.  Positional variation in the soil energy balance beneath a row-crop canopy , 1993 .

[12]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[13]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Overestimation of soybean crop transpiration by sap flow measurements under field conditions in Central Portugal , 1994, Irrigation Science.

[14]  J. W. Pendleton,et al.  Net and Spectral Radiation in Soybean Canopies1 , 1968 .

[15]  C. R. Weber,et al.  Interception of Solar Radiation and Dry Matter Production by Various Soybean Planting Patterns 1 , 1966 .

[16]  Larry C. Purcell,et al.  Soybean Yield and Biomass Responses to Increasing Plant Population Among Diverse Maturity Groups: I. Agronomic Characteristics , 2005 .

[17]  J. R. Wallin,et al.  Agrometeorological aspects of dew , 1967 .

[18]  Joe T. Ritchie,et al.  Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover , 1972 .

[19]  J. Hatfield,et al.  Photosynthetically Active Radiation, CO2 Uptake, and Stomatal Diffusive Resistance Profiles Within Soybean Canopies1 , 1978 .

[20]  W. J. Massmana,et al.  Eddy covariance flux corrections and uncertainties in long-term studies of carbon and energy exchanges , 2002 .

[21]  A. Saxton,et al.  Narrow-row seed-yield enhancement in determinate soybean. , 1990 .

[22]  John M. Norman,et al.  Estimating plant-available water across a field with an inverse yield model , 2003 .

[23]  C. R. Weber,et al.  Effect of Plant Population and Row Spacing on Soybean Development and Production1 , 1966 .

[24]  J. Hanway,et al.  How a soybean plant develops , 1967 .

[25]  E. K. Webb,et al.  Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer , 1980 .