Economic analysis of wider benefits to facilitate SuDS uptake in London, UK

Urban water management via Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS) has been successfully applied in cities worldwide. This infrastructure has proven to be a cost efficient solution to manage flood risks whilst also delivering wider benefits. Despite their technical performance, large-scale SuDS uptake in many places has been slow, mostly due to reasons beyond the engineering realm. This is the case of England and Wales, where the implementation of SuDS has not reached its full potential. This paper investigates the strategic role of SuDS retrofit in managing environmental risks to urban infrastructure at a catchment level, through an economic appraisal of all benefits (i.e. flood reduction and wider benefits). The Decoy Brook catchment in London, UK, was used as a case study. Average Annual Benefits were used to monetise the value of SuDS in reducing surface flood risk, whilst a Value Transfer approach was used to appraise wider benefits. It was found that by including the latter, their economic feasibility improves considerably. This paper also shows how to split the investment amongst multiple stakeholders, by highlighting the benefits each one derives. Finally, recommendations regarding incentives and policies to enhance the uptake of SuDS are given. The proposed methodology for SuDS mapping and economic appraisal in the planning phase can be used in cities worldwide, as long as general principles are adapted to local contexts.

[1]  S. Gamtessa,et al.  An explanation of residential energy-efficiency retrofit behavior in Canada , 2013 .

[2]  Woods Ballard,et al.  The SUDS manual , 2007 .

[3]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Delivering sustainable urban water management: a review of the hurdles we face. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  Yanling Li,et al.  Green roof hydrologic performance and modeling: a review. , 2014, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  Adrian Cashman,et al.  Adaptable Urban Drainage: Addressing Change in Intensity, Occurrence and Uncertainty of Stormwater (AUDACIOUS) , 2007 .

[6]  Peter Steen Mikkelsen,et al.  SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage , 2015 .

[7]  M. McCarthy,et al.  The UK’s wet and stormy winter of 2013/2014 , 2015 .

[8]  M. Keeley The Green Area Ratio: an urban site sustainability metric , 2011 .

[9]  Richard Ashley,et al.  Towards Integrated Approaches to Reduce Flood Risk in Urban Areas , 2007 .

[10]  Yuri Gorokhovich,et al.  Accuracy assessment of the processed SRTM-based elevation data by CGIAR using field data from USA and Thailand and its relation to the terrain characteristics , 2006 .

[11]  C. Zevenbergen,et al.  Challenges in urban flood management: travelling across spatial and temporal scales , 2008 .

[12]  R. Young Determining the Economic Value of Water: Concepts and Methods , 2005 .

[13]  R M Ashley,et al.  A GIS-based methodology for selecting stormwater disconnection opportunities. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[14]  Various Whole life costing for sustainable drainage , 2004 .

[15]  Paul Brown,et al.  Planning and Design for Sustainable and Resilient Cities: Theories, Strategies, and Best Practices for Green Infrastructure , 2010 .

[16]  Chris Jeffries,et al.  Post Project Monitoring of BMPs/SUDS to Determine Performance and Whole Life Cost , 2003 .

[17]  Andrew Swan,et al.  Retrofit SuDS—cost estimates and decision-support tools , 2007 .

[18]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  How might climate change affect river flows across the Thames Basin? An area-wide analysis using the UKCP09 Regional Climate Model ensemble , 2012 .

[19]  M. Keeley Using Individual Parcel Assessments to Improve Stormwater Management , 2007 .

[20]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  Consumer demand for green stormwater management technology in an urban setting: The case of Chicago rain barrels , 2011 .

[21]  S Vigneswaran,et al.  Development of a confined water sensitive urban design (WSUD) system using engineered soils. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[22]  David Butler,et al.  Making more sustainable decisions for asset investment in the water industry - sustainable water industry asset resource decisions - the SWARD project , 2002 .

[23]  R. Ashley,et al.  Appropriate Drainage Systems for a Changing Climate in the Water Sensitive City , 2010 .

[24]  E. Nnadi,et al.  Geotextile Incorporated Permeable Pavement System as Potential Source of Irrigation Water: Effects of Re‐Used Water on the Soil, Plant Growth and Development , 2014 .

[25]  Dwight M. Jaffee,et al.  Energy efficiency retrofits for U.S. housing: Removing the bottlenecks , 2014 .

[26]  W. Featherstone,et al.  Comparison and validation of the recent freely available ASTER-GDEM ver1, SRTM ver4.1 and GEODATA DEM-9S ver3 digital elevation models over Australia , 2010 .

[27]  Les K. Lampe Post-Project Monitoring of Bmps/Suds to Determine Performance and Whole-Life Costs , 2004 .

[28]  L Werbeloff,et al.  Security through diversity: moving from rhetoric to practice. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[29]  S. Charlesworth A review of the adaptation and mitigation of global climate change using sustainable drainage in cities , 2010 .

[30]  S. Arthur,et al.  Public perception of SuDS ponds - Valuing Amenity , 2011 .

[31]  Paul Cooper,et al.  Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art , 2012 .

[32]  Richard Smardon,et al.  Understanding urban neighborhood differences in willingness to implement green infrastructure measures: a case study of Syracuse, NY , 2015 .

[33]  Ilse M. Voskamp,et al.  Planning support system for climate adaptation: Composing effective sets of blue-green measures to reduce urban vulnerability to extreme weather events , 2015 .

[34]  Ray Galvin,et al.  Thermal upgrades of existing homes in Germany: The building code, subsidies, and economic efficiency , 2010 .

[35]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  German experience in managing stormwater with green infrastructure , 2014 .

[36]  Aleksandra Kazmierczak,et al.  Adaptation to climate change using green and blue infrastructure: A database of case studies. , 2010 .

[37]  Christos Makropoulos,et al.  Rethinking urban areas: an example of an integrated blue-green approach , 2013 .

[38]  Lee K. Rhea,et al.  Catchment-scale hydrologic implications of parcel-level stormwater management (Ohio USA) , 2013 .

[39]  B. Helmreich,et al.  General Technical Approvals for Decentralised Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS)—The Current Situation in Germany , 2015 .

[40]  Hale W. Thurston,et al.  Opportunity Costs of Residential Best Management Practices for Stormwater Runoff Control , 2006 .

[41]  Simon Parry,et al.  Potential influences on the United Kingdom's floods of winter 2013/14 , 2014 .

[42]  Pierre Briole,et al.  SRTM 3″ DEM (versions 1, 2, 3, 4) validation by means of extensive kinematic GPS measurements: a case study from North Greece , 2010 .