The Effect of Embodied Impact on the Cost-Optimal Levels of Nearly Zero Energy Buildings: A Case Study of a Residential Building in Thessaloniki, Greece

Considering the nearly zero energy building (nZEB) and the increased measures for the improvement of the energy efficiency, the international literature indicates an extended use of specialized materials and technical installations. An increase in the embodied energy follows that use, with a final share between 74% and 100% in the total life cycle energy of residential nZEBs. The current energy efficiency legislation considers only the impact from the operational phase and ignores the embodied impact from the remaining life cycle phases of the building. Nevertheless, the delegated regulation 244 of 2012 acknowledges the incompleteness of this assessment and provides an optional consideration of the embodied (“grey”) energy. The current study applies this option through the macroeconomic global cost calculations and the cost-optimal levels of nZEBs. The results indicate a limited effect of the embodied impact on the cost-optimal levels and in specific on extended calculation periods and in combination with other key parameters of the sensitivity analysis. An increase in the primary energy and a transposition to variants with lower use of materials and decreased embodied emissions follow this effect. Sensitivity analysis confirms the calculation period as a key parameter and indicates the need for further research.

[1]  Luís Bragança,et al.  Sustainability assessment of dwellings – a comparison of methodologies , 2016 .

[2]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings , 2010 .

[3]  Metal Pedestal,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT DECLARATION OF , 2011 .

[4]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy , 2009 .

[5]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Energy life-cycle approach in Net zero energy buildings balance: Operation and embodied energy of an Italian case study , 2014 .

[6]  Monika Hall,et al.  Two Years of Experience with a Net Zero Energy Balance - Analysis of the Swiss MINERGIE-A Standard , 2014 .

[7]  D. Koubogiannis,et al.  How much Energy is Embodied in your Central Heating Boiler , 2016 .

[8]  S. R. Chandratilake,et al.  Sustainability rating systems for buildings: Comparisons and correlations , 2013 .

[9]  J. Burnett,et al.  Analysis of embodied energy use in the residential building of Hong Kong , 2001 .

[10]  Karen Allacker,et al.  Sustainability assessment of energy saving measures: A multi-criteria approach for residential buildings retrofitting—A case study of the Spanish housing stock , 2016 .

[11]  Constantinos A. Balaras,et al.  Embodied CO2 Emissions in Building Construction Materials of Hellenic Dwellings , 2017 .

[12]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a single-family residence built to either conventional- or passive house standard , 2012 .

[13]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[14]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[15]  Martin Belusko,et al.  Minimising the life cycle energy of buildings: Review and analysis , 2014 .

[16]  Constantinos A. Balaras,et al.  Mapping the energy performance of hellenic residential buildings from EPC (energy performance certificate) data , 2016 .

[17]  Marta Maria Sesana,et al.  Overview on life cycle methodologies and economic feasibility for nZEBs , 2013 .

[18]  Agis M. Papadopoulos,et al.  Comparative analysis of various heating systems for residential buildings in Mediterranean climate , 2016 .

[19]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  Life cycle assessment of domestic hot water systems: a comparative analysis , 2016 .

[20]  Annik Magerholm Fet,et al.  Eco-labeling, Product Category Rules and Certification Procedures Based on ISO 14025 Requirements (6 pp) , 2006 .

[21]  Theodoros Theodosiou,et al.  Embodied energy in residential buildings-towards the nearly zero energy building: A literature review , 2016 .

[22]  Ozge Suzer,et al.  A comparative review of environmental concern prioritization: LEED vs other major certification systems. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  K. Adalberth,et al.  Energy use during the life cycle of single-unit dwellings: Examples , 1997 .

[24]  Patxi Hernandez,et al.  Development of a methodology for life cycle building energy ratings , 2011 .

[25]  Alex K. Jones,et al.  A Materials Life Cycle Assessment of a Net-Zero Energy Building , 2013 .

[26]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  A multi-scale life-cycle energy and greenhouse-gas emissions analysis model for residential buildings , 2014 .

[27]  Jlm Jan Hensen,et al.  Embodied energy of building materials and green building rating systems — a case study for industrial halls , 2010 .

[28]  E. Giama,et al.  Assessment tools for the environmental evaluation of concrete, plaster and brick elements production , 2015 .