Low carbon innovation and enterprise growth in the UK: Challenges of a place-blind policy mix

This paper uses a policy mix approach to examine the institutional and governance issues arising from the UK's support for innovation in low carbon manufacturing sectors. The paper draws on interviews with managers of small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises as well as policy practitioners and industry experts. The analysis of these interviews highlights issues in the multi-scalar design and delivery of these policies, including gaps and tensions in the policy mix, as well as the importance, and relative neglect of, regional institutional entrepreneurship in driving change. We find that coherence and consistency in UK low-carbon innovation policy is lacking, which is creating uncertainty and hampering private sector investment. The loss of regional capacity and anchor institutions challenges local and national actors to leverage instruments and connections but with much depleted resources, lacking a clear mandate, and facing a fragmented intermediary and support landscape.

[1]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  How the policy mix and its consistency impact innovation: Findings from company case studies on offshore wind in Germany , 2014 .

[2]  Timothy J. Foxon,et al.  Policy support for innovation to secure improvements in resource productivity , 2003 .

[3]  E. Uyarra,et al.  Policies for science, technology and innovation:: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting , 2008 .

[4]  V. Hoffmann,et al.  The two faces of market support—How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry , 2013 .

[5]  V. Costantini,et al.  Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector , 2015 .

[6]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Towards a more comprehensive policy mix conceptualization for environmental technological change: a literature synthesis , 2013 .

[7]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[8]  M. Mazzucato.  The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs Private Sector Myths (an excerpt) , 2015, Journal of Economic Sociology.

[9]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Probing "green" industry enterprises in the UK: A new identification approach , 2014 .

[10]  Valeria Costantini,et al.  Environmental Regulation and the Export Dynamics of Energy Technologies , 2007 .

[11]  V. Hoffmann,et al.  The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change – Does the locus of policies matter? , 2012 .

[12]  Lee Pugalis,et al.  New directions in economic development: Localist policy discourses and the Localism Act , 2013 .

[13]  Keith Jackson,et al.  Prospects for ‘place-based’ industrial policy in England , 2013 .

[14]  Dirk Fornahl,et al.  From the Old Path of Shipbuilding onto the New Path of Offshore Wind Energy? The Case of Northern Germany , 2012 .

[15]  Michael Heseltine,et al.  No stone unturned : in pursuit of growth , 2012 .

[16]  K. Morgan.  Path dependence and the state: the politics of novelty in old industrial regions , 2013 .

[17]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[18]  Ramana Nanda,et al.  Venture Capital Investment in the Clean Energy Sector , 2010 .

[19]  M. Howlett,et al.  Introduction: Understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution , 2009 .

[20]  J. Essletzbichler.  Renewable Energy Technology and Path Creation: A Multi-scalar Approach to Energy Transition in the UK , 2012 .

[21]  Pablo del Río González,et al.  The interaction between emissions trading and renewable electricity support schemes. An overview of the literature , 2007 .

[22]  Stuart Dawley,et al.  Creating New Paths? Offshore Wind, Policy Activism, and Peripheral Region Development , 2014 .

[23]  Pablo del Río,et al.  Comparing the innovation effects of support schemes for renewable electricity technologies: A function of innovation approach , 2012 .

[24]  Edurne Magro,et al.  Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix , 2013 .

[25]  Richard E. Matland.  Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation , 1995 .

[26]  Anna J. Wieczorek,et al.  Broadening the national focus in technological innovation system analysis : The case of offshore wind , 2015 .

[27]  Malte Schneider,et al.  The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System — Findings of company case studies in the German power sector , 2011 .

[28]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  Towards improved policy processes for promoting innovation in renewable electricity technologies in the UK , 2007 .

[29]  Skills.  The plan for growth , 2011 .

[30]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Emerging in between: The multi-level governance of renewable energy in the English regions , 2007 .

[31]  Elvira Uyarra,et al.  A role for public procurement in system innovation: the transformation of the Greater Manchester (UK) waste system , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[32]  Mike Hodson,et al.  Cities mediating technological transitions: understanding visions, intermediation and consequences , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[33]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Technological Relatedness, Related Variety and Economic Geography , 2011 .

[34]  James Simmie,et al.  Path Dependence and New Technological Path Creation in the Danish Wind Power Industry , 2012 .

[35]  Vicki Norberg-Bohm,et al.  Stimulating ‘green’ technological innovation: An analysis of alternative policy mechanisms , 1999 .

[36]  Rainer Quitzow,et al.  Assessing policy strategies for the promotion of environmental technologies: A review of India's National Solar Mission , 2015 .

[37]  M. Grubb.  Technology Innovation and Climate Change Policy: an overview of issues and options , 2004 .

[38]  P. Simmonds,et al.  Energy Technologies Institute Mid-Term Review , 2013 .

[39]  Pablo del Río,et al.  The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems , 2013 .

[40]  David Bailey,et al.  Manufacturing reshoring and its limits: the UK automotive case , 2014 .

[41]  J. Rayner,et al.  Design Principles for Policy Mixes: Cohesion and Coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements’ , 2007 .

[42]  R. Gross,et al.  UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures , 2005 .

[43]  Pablo del Río González,et al.  The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: A research agenda , 2009 .

[44]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[45]  E. Uyarra,et al.  Reconceptualising the 'policy mix' for innovation , 2011 .

[46]  F. Kern.  Using the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions to assess innovation policy , 2012 .

[47]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies , 2012 .

[48]  Ashoka Mody,et al.  Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology , 1996 .

[49]  Gregory C. Unruh.  Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[50]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[51]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Why space matters in technological innovation systems – the global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology , 2014 .

[52]  P. Cooke.  Socio-technical Transitions and Varieties of Capitalism: Green Regional Innovation and Distinctive Market Niches , 2010 .

[53]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[54]  K. Rennings.  Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics , 2000 .