Low-stress bicycling connectivity: Assessment of the network build-out in Edmonton, Canada

Abstract Studies have shown that a network of safe, connected, and direct facilities can increase urban cycling levels. During summer 2017, the city of Edmonton, Canada, constructed nearly 20 km of protected bicycle lanes on its core neighborhood streets. A rapid and coordinated network implementation was preferred to the more traditional incremental approach to bike lane construction. In this paper, we evaluate the low-stress connectivity improvements afforded by this network build-out. We first classify streets and trails according to the Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) framework, which we adapt to the metric system. Using only LTS 2 and LTS 1 network links, posited to be adequate for most adults, we apply three analyses. First, we draw “bikeshed” maps, which show areas of connectivity around seven central destinations. Our comparison before and after the build-out points to a better integration of the network, with previously separate bikesheds overlapping and allowing uninterrupted low-stress travel to more destinations. This analysis also allows us to identify several central neighborhoods which are disconnected due to remaining high-stress links. Second, we generate roughly three-hundred hypothetical origins located in the central neighborhoods of the city. Reflecting the improved bikeshed integration, we observe a four-fold increase in connected origin-destination pairs. Finally, we find small reductions in trip lengths between connected pairs for some of the trips that were possible before the build-out. However, important detours are still necessary to remain on an exclusively low-stress network when compared to the shortest path using the full network, regardless of LTS. The primary contribution of our research is to develop a method of analysis, based on straightforward tools, to study the city-wide impacts of targeted infrastructure improvements and is most relevant for cities in the initial stages of bicycle network development.

[1]  Chen Chen,et al.  How bicycle level of traffic stress correlate with reported cyclist accidents injury severities: A geospatial and mixed logit analysis. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  William E. Moritz,et al.  Survey of North American Bicycle Commuters: Design and Aggregate Results , 1997 .

[3]  Esko Lehtonen,et al.  Evaluating Bicyclists’ Risk Perception Using Video Clips: Comparison of Frequent and Infrequent City Cyclists , 2016 .

[4]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Bikeway Networks: A Review of Effects on Cycling , 2016 .

[5]  Eoghan Clifford,et al.  Using mental mapping to unpack perceived cycling risk. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  P. Apparicio,et al.  A ride for whom: Has cycling network expansion reduced inequities in accessibility in Montreal, Canada? , 2018 .

[7]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Models of perceived cycling risk and route acceptability. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Kees Maat,et al.  Commuting by Bicycle: An Overview of the Literature , 2010 .

[9]  David S. Vale,et al.  Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility , 2016 .

[10]  Michael Grant,et al.  How Far Out of the Way Will We Travel? , 2010 .

[11]  Nathan McNeil,et al.  Bikeability and the 20-min Neighborhood , 2011 .

[12]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Revisiting the Four Types of Cyclists: Findings from a National Survey , 2016 .

[13]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Measuring Nonmotorized Accessibility and Connectivity in a Robust Pedestrian Network , 2012 .

[14]  S. Titze,et al.  Association of built-environment, social-environment and personal factors with bicycling as a mode of transportation among Austrian city dwellers. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[15]  K. Nurul Habib,et al.  How does the inclination to bicycle sway the decision to ride in warm and winter seasons? , 2018 .

[16]  Sean Lawrence,et al.  Lowering Bicycle Stress One Link at a Time: Where Should We Invest in Infrastructure? , 2018 .

[17]  Meghan Winters,et al.  Mapping Bikeability: A Spatial Tool to Support Sustainable Travel , 2013 .

[18]  Ahmed El-Geneidy,et al.  Overcoming barriers to cycling: understanding frequency of cycling in a University setting and the factors preventing commuters from cycling on a regular basis , 2017 .

[19]  Michael B. Lowry,et al.  Assessment of Communitywide Bikeability with Bicycle Level of Service , 2012 .

[20]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Factors Affecting Bicycling Demand , 2007 .

[21]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Who are Bicyclists? Why and how much are they Bicycling? , 2009 .

[22]  Jessica E. Schoner,et al.  The missing link: bicycle infrastructure networks and ridership in 74 US cities , 2014 .

[23]  J. Pucher,et al.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[24]  Rebecca L. Sanders,et al.  Perceived traffic risk for cyclists: the impact of near miss and collision experiences. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Michael Grimsrud,et al.  What’s your type: a multidimensional cyclist typology , 2014 .

[26]  Sara Moridpour,et al.  Measuring cycling accessibility in metropolitan areas , 2017 .

[27]  Nathan McNeil,et al.  Four Types of Cyclists? , 2013 .

[28]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  A travel behavior analysis of urban cycling facilities in Montréal, Canada , 2011 .

[29]  Peter G Furth,et al.  Prioritizing new bicycle facilities to improve low-stress network connectivity , 2016 .

[30]  A. Bergström,et al.  Potential of transferring car trips to bicycle during winter , 2003 .

[31]  K. Teschke,et al.  Motivators and deterrents of bicycling: comparing influences on decisions to ride , 2011 .