JOINT MEETING OF THE CHEMICALS COMMITTEE AND THE WORKING PARTY ON CHEMICALS, PESTICIDES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY NEW GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON AN INTEGRATED APPROACH ON TESTING AND ASSESSMENT (IATA) FOR SKIN CORROSION AND IRRITATION

[1]  P Pulewka.  [Toxicology and pharmacology joined and separated]. , 1974, Die Medizinische Welt.

[2]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  Applicability of in vitro tests for skin irritation and corrosion to regulatory classification schemes: substantiating test strategies with data from routine studies. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[3]  H. Buist,et al.  The OSIRIS Weight of Evidence approach: ITS for skin sensitisation. , 2013, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[4]  S. Hoffmann,et al.  Regulatory assessment of in vitro skin corrosion and irritation data within the European framework: Workshop recommendations. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[5]  STREAMLINED SUMMARY DOCUMENT SUPPORTING OECD TEST GUIDELINE 438 ON THE ISOLATED CHICKEN EYE FOR EYE IRRITATION/CORROSION Environment Directorate ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Paris 2013 , 2013 .

[6]  S. Letašiová,et al.  Analysis of the validated epiderm skin corrosion test (EpiDerm SCT) and a prediction model for sub-categorization according to the UN GHS and EU CLP , 2013 .

[7]  M. Pavan,et al.  Evaluation of SARs for the prediction of skin irritation/corrosion potential–structural inclusion rules in the BfR decision support system , 2007, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[8]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  The ECVAM International Validation Study on in Vitro Tests for Acute Skin Irritation: Report on the Validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm Assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test a , 2007, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[9]  M Liebsch,et al.  The ECVAM International Validation Study on In Vitro Tests for Skin Corrosivity. 2. Results and Evaluation by the Management Team. , 1998, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[10]  H. Maibach,et al.  Experimental Validation of a Structure–Activity Relationship Model of Skin Irritation by Esters , 2000 .

[11]  H. Maibach,et al.  High dissociation constants (pKa) of basic permeants are associated with in vivo skin irritation in man , 1996, Contact dermatitis.

[12]  Hulzebos Em,et al.  The application of structure-activity relationships in human hazard assessment: a first approach , 2001 .

[13]  H. Maibach,et al.  A comparison of rabbit and human skin response to certain irritants. , 1972, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[14]  M D Barratt,et al.  Quantitative structure activity relationships for skin corrosivity of organic acids, bases and phenols. , 1995, Toxicology letters.

[15]  A. B. Hill,et al.  "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" (1965), by Austin Bradford Hill , 2017 .

[16]  A J Hopfinger,et al.  Prediction of skin irritation from organic chemicals using membrane-interaction QSAR analysis. , 2001, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[17]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  An Evaluation of the Proposed OECD Testing Strategy for Skin Corrosion , 1998, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[18]  D A Basketter,et al.  Evaluation of a human patch test for the identification and classification of skin irritation potential , 1996, Contact dermatitis.

[19]  Enrico Mombelli,et al.  An Evaluation of the Predictive Ability of the QSAR Software Packages, DEREK, HAZARDEXPERT and TOPKAT, to Describe Chemically-induced Skin Irritation , 2008, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[20]  M D Barratt,et al.  Quantitative structure-Activity relationships for skin irritation and corrosivity of neutral and electrophilic organic chemicals. , 1996, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[21]  R. L. Robinson,et al.  Quantitative structure-property relationships modeling of skin irritation. , 2009, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[22]  John H. Draize,et al.  METHODS FOR THE STUDY OF IRRITATION AND TOXICITY OF SUBSTANCES APPLIED TOPICALLY TO THE SKIN AND MUCOUS MEMBRANES , 1944 .

[23]  D. Basketter,et al.  Skin Irritation and Sensitization: Mechanisms and New Approaches for Risk Assessment , 2008, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[24]  John D. Walker,et al.  The Skin Irritation Corrosion Rules Estimation Tool (SICRET) , 2005 .

[25]  Michael Balls,et al.  Statement on the application of the CORROSITEX assay for skin corrosivity testing. , 2001, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[26]  Emiel Rorije,et al.  29 Development of (Q)SARs for Dermal Irritation and Corrosion Assessment Using European Union New Chemicals Notification Data , 2007 .

[27]  Sebastian Hoffmann,et al.  Skin irritation: prevalence, variability, and regulatory classification of existing in vivo data from industrial chemicals. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[28]  R Posthumus,et al.  Validity and validation of expert (Q)SAR systems. , 2005, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[29]  N. Alépée,et al.  Sub-categorisation of skin corrosive chemicals by the EpiSkin™ reconstructed human epidermis skin corrosion test method according to UN GHS: revision of OECD Test Guideline 431. , 2014, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[30]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data. , 2009, Toxicology letters.

[31]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  A Review of (Q)SAR Models for Skin and Eye Irritation and Corrosion , 2008 .

[32]  John D. Walker,et al.  (Q)SARs for predicting skin irritation and corrosion: Mechanisms, transparency and applicability of predictions , 2004 .

[33]  John D. Walker,et al.  Verification of literature‐derived SARs for skin irritation and corrosion , 2003 .