Experimental assimilation of DIAL water vapour observations in the ECMWF global model

A unique airborne differential absorption lidar (DIAL) for water vapour observations was developed at the Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR). Installed on board the DLR Falcon 20 aircraft, the system measured a dataset of about 3900 water vapour profiles during the T-PARC field campaign. These high-resolution humidity observations were assimilated into the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) global model using a version of the operational four-dimensional variational data assimilation system. The assimilation system is able to extract the information for DIAL observations, and verification with independent dropsonde observations shows a reduction in the analysis error when DIAL water vapour observations are assimilated. The forecast influence of the humidity observations is found to be small in most cases, but the observations are able to affect the forecast considerably under certain conditions. Systematic errors are investigated by comparison between humidity model fields, DIAL and dropsonde observations. Overall, DIAL observations are roughly 7–10% drier than model fields throughout the troposphere. Comparison with dropsonde observations suggests that the DIAL observations are too dry in the lower troposphere but not above it. Copyright © 2011 Royal Meteorological Society

[1]  C. Kiemle,et al.  Airborne all-solid-state DIAL for water vapour measurements in the tropopause region: system description and assessment of accuracy , 2002 .

[2]  Christopher Portier,et al.  Risk factors for childhood leukaemia. Discussion and summary. , 2008, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[3]  D Bruneau,et al.  Airborne Lidar LEANDRE II for Water-Vapor Profiling in the Troposphere. II. First results. , 2001, Applied optics.

[4]  Jean-Noël Thépaut,et al.  Analysis and forecast impact of the main humidity observing systems , 2007 .

[5]  T. N. Krishnamurti,et al.  Impact of CAMEX-4 Datasets for Hurricane Forecasts Using a Global Model , 2006 .

[6]  Koji Yamashita,et al.  The Influence of Assimilating Dropsonde Data on Typhoon Track and Midlatitude Forecasts , 2011 .

[7]  A. P. McNally,et al.  A note on the occurrence of cloud in meteorologically sensitive areas and the implications for advanced infrared sounders , 2002 .

[8]  Erik Andersson,et al.  Influence‐matrix diagnostic of a data assimilation system , 2004 .

[9]  Martin Wirth,et al.  Tropospheric Water Vapor Transport as Determined from Airborne Lidar Measurements , 2010 .

[10]  T. Krishnamurti,et al.  Adaptive use of research aircraft data sets for hurricane forecasts , 2008 .

[11]  Sim D. Aberson,et al.  The Impact of Dropwindsonde Observations on Typhoon Track Forecasts in DOTSTAR and T-PARC , 2011 .

[12]  J. Thepaut,et al.  383 Assimilation and Modelling of the Hydrological Cycle : ECMWF ’ s Status and Plans , 2002 .

[13]  J. Bösenberg,et al.  Ground-based differential absorption lidar for water-vapor and temperature profiling: methodology. , 1998, Applied optics.

[14]  M. Lemone,et al.  Latent Heat Flux Profiles from Collocated Airborne Water Vapor and Wind Lidars during IHOP_2002 , 2007 .

[15]  P. Bauer,et al.  618 Direct 4 D-Var assimilation of all-sky radiances . Part I : Implementation , 2010 .

[16]  Peter Bauer,et al.  The comparative impact of the assimilation of SSM/I and TMI brightness temperatures in the ECMWF 4D‐Var system , 2001 .

[17]  S. Hagemann,et al.  Sensitivity of large-scale atmospheric analyses to humidity observations and its impact on the global water cycle and tropical and extratropical weather systems in ERA40 , 2004 .

[18]  James L. Franklin,et al.  The NCAR GPS Dropwindsonde , 1999 .

[19]  J. Bösenberg,et al.  Ground-based differential absorption lidar for water-vapor profiling: assessment of accuracy, resolution, and meteorological applications. , 1998, Applied optics.

[20]  C. Weitkamp.  Lidar, Range-Resolved Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere , 2005 .

[21]  Paul Poli,et al.  Diagnosis of observation, background and analysis‐error statistics in observation space , 2005 .

[22]  A. Simmons,et al.  The ECMWF operational implementation of four‐dimensional variational assimilation. I: Experimental results with simplified physics , 2007 .

[23]  Jean-Noël Thépaut,et al.  Assimilation experiments with CHAMP GPS radio occultation measurements , 2006 .

[24]  M. Baldwin,et al.  THE WGNE ASSESSMENT OF SHORT-TERM QUANTITATIVE PRECIPITATION FORECASTS , 2003 .

[25]  E. Browell,et al.  Airborne and spaceborne lidar measurements of water vapor profiles: a sensitivity analysis. , 1989, Applied optics.

[26]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Four-Dimensional Variational Assimilation of Water Vapor Differential Absorption Lidar Data: The First Case Study within IHOP_2002 , 2006 .

[27]  G. Ehret,et al.  Major Advances Foreseen in Humidity Profiling from the Water Vapour Lidar Experiment in Space (WALES) , 2004 .

[28]  P. Bauer,et al.  Comparison of TMI rainfall estimates and their impact on 4D‐Var assimilation , 2002 .

[29]  Heikki Järvinen,et al.  Variational quality control , 1999 .

[30]  William B. Grant,et al.  Differential absorption lidar (DIAL) measurements from air and space , 1998 .

[31]  J. Thepaut,et al.  Assimilation and Modeling of the Atmospheric Hydrological Cycle in the ECMWF Forecasting System , 2005 .

[32]  Douglas Hunt,et al.  Comparing radiosonde and COSMIC atmospheric profile data to quantify differences among radiosonde types and the effects of imperfect collocation on comparison statistics , 2010 .

[33]  J. Mahfouf,et al.  The ecmwf operational implementation of four‐dimensional variational assimilation. III: Experimental results and diagnostics with operational configuration , 2000 .

[34]  Gerhard Ehret,et al.  The airborne multi-wavelength water vapor differential absorption lidar WALES: system design and performance , 2009 .

[35]  Junhong Wang.  Evaluation of the Dropsonde Humidity Sensor Using Data from DYCOMS-II and IHOP_2002 , 2005 .

[36]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Intercomparison of Water Vapor Data Measured with Lidar during IHOP_2002. Part II: Airborne-to-Airborne Systems , 2007 .

[37]  Kathryn Young,et al.  Water vapor variability and comparisons in the subtropical Pacific from The Observing System Research and Predictability Experiment-Pacific Asian Regional Campaign (T-PARC) Driftsonde, Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC), and reanalyses , 2010 .

[38]  P. Di Girolamo,et al.  The water vapour intercomparison effort in the framework of the Convective and Orographically‐induced Precipitation Study: airborne‐to‐ground‐based and airborne‐to‐airborne lidar systems , 2011 .

[39]  G. Stiller,et al.  First airborne water vapor lidar measurements in the tropical upper troposphere and mid-latitudes lower stratosphere: accuracy evaluation and intercomparisons with other instruments , 2008 .

[40]  Paul Poli,et al.  Forecast impact studies of zenith total delay data from European near real‐time GPS stations in Météo France 4DVAR , 2007 .

[41]  R. Pierrehumbert.  The hydrologic cycle in deep-time climate problems , 2002, Nature.

[42]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Development and optimization of the IPM MM5 GPS slant path 4DVAR system , 2008 .

[43]  Christian Keil,et al.  Sensitivity of quantitative precipitation forecast to height dependent changes in humidity , 2008 .

[44]  D Bruneau,et al.  Airborne Lidar LEANDRE II for Water-Vapor Profiling in the Troposphere. I. System description. , 2001, Applied optics.

[45]  Gerhard Ehret,et al.  Evaluation of ECMWF water vapour fields by airborne differential absorption lidar measurements: a case study between Brazil and Europe , 2007 .

[46]  Lennart Bengtsson,et al.  On the impact of humidity observations in numerical weather prediction , 2005 .

[47]  Roberto Buizza,et al.  Impact of singular‐vector‐based satellite data thinning on NWP , 2011 .

[48]  Donato Summa,et al.  Intercomparison of Water Vapor Data Measured with Lidar during IHOP_2002. Part I: Airborne to Ground-Based Lidar Systems and Comparisons with Chilled-Mirror Hygrometer Radiosondes , 2007 .

[49]  Syed Ismail,et al.  Impact of high resolution water vapor cross‐sectional data on hurricane forecasting , 2003 .