Re‐creating a Recipe for Science Instructional Programs: Adding Learning Progressions, Scaffolding, and a Dash of Reading Variety

The purpose of this article is to focus on the development and refinement of a science instructional design program arguing for the feasibility and usability of integrated reading and science instruction as implemented in third- and fourth-grade science classrooms to meet the learning needs of diverse learners. These instructional components are easily inserted into existing programs that build students' science background knowledge and abilities to apply learning through scaffolded activities focused on (1) providing structured opportunities for students to engage in hands-on activities; (2) increasing vocabulary knowledge and understanding of concept-laden terms, and (3) reading paired narrative and informational science texts. Extensive research shows that as students transition from third to fourth grade and beyond, they are often challenged in science by new vocabulary coupled with new concepts. Active ingredients of our reconceptualized science instructional design program are narrative informational texts, hands-on science activities, and science textbook(s).

[1]  Erin M. McTigue,et al.  Science Textbooks' Use of Graphical Representation: A Descriptive Analysis of Four Sixth Grade Science Texts , 2010 .

[2]  Nell K. Duke,et al.  3.6 Minutes per Day: The Scarcity of Informational Texts in First Grade. , 2000 .

[3]  William H. Schmidt,et al.  A Coherent Curriculum: The Case of Mathematics. , 2002 .

[4]  Timothy R. Blair,et al.  Vocabulary Strategies for Linguistically Diverse Learners , 2008 .

[5]  Steven A. Stahl,et al.  The Effects of Vocabulary Instruction: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis , 1986 .

[6]  Timothy R. Blair,et al.  The Effective Teacher of Reading: Considering the “What” and “How” of Instruction , 2007 .

[7]  W. Schmidt,et al.  Curriculum coherence: an examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective , 2005 .

[8]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Message from the “Island group”: What is literacy in science literacy? , 2003 .

[9]  W. Nagy,et al.  Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second-grade readers and at-risk fourth-grade writers , 2003 .

[10]  L. Labbo Toward a Vision of the Future Role of Technology in Literacy Education. , 1999 .

[11]  Kathleen E. Metz On the Complex Relation Between Cognitive Developmental Research and Children’s Science Curricula , 1997 .

[12]  Edward J. Kameenui,et al.  Vocabulary Tricks: Effects of Instruction in Morphology and Context on Fifth-Grade Students’Ability to Derive and Infer Word Meanings , 2003 .

[13]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Effects on Text Comprehension of Differing Proportions and Locations of Difficult Vocabulary , 1983 .

[14]  R. Slavin,et al.  Effective Reading Programs for Middle and High Schools: A Best‐Evidence Synthesis , 2008 .

[15]  Ronald W. Marx,et al.  “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science , 2001 .

[16]  Joan D. Pasley,et al.  What Is High-Quality Instruction?. , 2004 .

[17]  Carolyn S. Wallace,et al.  New directions in language and science education research , 2004 .

[18]  Jo Ellen Roseman,et al.  How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review , 2002 .

[19]  Karen D. Wood,et al.  Research on Vocabulary Instruction in the Content Areas: Implications for Struggling Readers , 2005 .

[20]  Bruce Saddler,et al.  Sentence Combining: A Sentence‐Level Writing Intervention , 2005 .

[21]  C. W. Anderson,et al.  FOCUS ARTICLE: Implications of Research on Children's Learning for Standards and Assessment: A Proposed Learning Progression for Matter and the Atomic-Molecular Theory , 2006 .

[22]  Michael D. Coyne,et al.  Quality Indicators for Group Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Special Education , 2005 .

[23]  A. Biemiller,et al.  VOCABULARY: NEEDED IF MORE CHILDREN ARE TO READ WELL , 2003 .

[24]  Words Are Wonderful: Interactive, Time‐Efficient Strategies to Teach Meaning Vocabulary , 2005 .

[25]  D. Gardner Children's Immediate Understanding OF Vocabulary: Contexts and Dictionary Definitions , 2007 .

[26]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension , 2007 .