Evidence from Mutual Masking for Serial Processing of Tachistoscopic Letter Patterns

This experiment demonstrates serial processing of tachistoscopic patterns when all potential artifacts are eliminated. Two nonsense arrays of six letters were tachistoscopically exposed successively at the same positions. Ss identified more letters from the temporally first string on the left of fixation and more from the second on the right, indicating left-to-right serial processing. Variations among Ss in the location of the crossover in curves indicate individual differences in processing time. Therefore, this study demonstrates definitively that tachistoscopic performance at various positions can reflect a sequential left-to-right processing of information, possibly at different rates.

[1]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  VISUAL INFORMATION PROCESSING WITH SEQUENTIAL INPUTS: A GENERAL MODEL FOR SEQUENTIAL BLANKING, DISPLACEMENT, AND OVERPRINTING PHENOMENA * , 1970 .

[2]  D. Raab.  Backward masking. , 1963, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  E R HARCUM,et al.  Effects of Stimulus Reversals on Lateral Dominance in Word Recognition , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  Harcum Er,et al.  PRE- VERSUS POST-KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIRED REPRODUCTION SEQUENCE FOR TACHISTOSCOPIC PATTERNS. , 1963 .

[5]  E R HARCUM,et al.  Visual Pattern Perception with Varied Fixation Locus and Response Recording , 1964, Perceptual and Motor Skills.

[6]  P. Merikle,et al.  Selective forward masking. , 1972, Canadian journal of psychology.

[7]  E. R. Harcum,et al.  REVERSAL READING BY ISRAELI OBSERVERS OF VISUAL PATTERNS WITHOUT INTRINSIC DIRECTIONALITY. , 1963, Canadian journal of psychology.

[8]  N. Weisstein.  Backward masking and models of perceptual processing. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  E R Harcum,et al.  Serial Processing Shown by Mutual Masking of Icons , 1975, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Familiarity and method of report as determinants of tachistoscopic performance. , 1971 .

[11]  L. C. Gilbert.  Speed of processing visual stimuli and its relation to reading. , 1959 .

[12]  G. Sperling,et al.  Successive approximations to a model for short term memory. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[13]  E. R. Harcum,et al.  Monocular and binocular reproduction of binary stimuli appearing right and left of fixation. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  J. Ayres,et al.  Directional Response-Bias in Reproducing Brief Visual Patterns , 1962 .

[15]  Harcum Er.  Perceptual serial-position curves with a frequently isolated element. , 1968 .

[16]  Bertram Scharf,et al.  Word recognition with masking , 1966 .

[17]  E. R. Harcum.  Parallel functions of serial learning and tachistoscopic pattern perception. , 1967, Psychological review.

[18]  Lester A. Lefton,et al.  Guessing and the order of approximation effect. , 1973 .

[19]  Harcum Er.  Parallel functions of serial learning and tachistoscopic pattern perception. , 1967 .

[20]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[21]  V. Keenan.  Effects of Hebrew and English letters on children's perceptual set. , 1972, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[22]  William A. Phillips,et al.  Does familiarity affect transfer from an iconic to a short-term memory? , 1971 .

[23]  M. Turvey.  On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. , 1973, Psychological review.

[24]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal luminance summation effects in backward and forward masking , 1966 .

[25]  Ralph Norman Haber,et al.  Clarity and recognition of masked and degraded stimuli , 1968 .

[26]  Harcum Er,et al.  Explanation of Mishkin and Forgays' result as a directional-reading conflict. , 1963 .

[27]  Harcum Er.  Two possible mechanisms of differential set in tachistoscopic perception of multiple targets. , 1967 .

[28]  F Smith,et al.  Temporal factors in visual information processing. , 1966, Canadian journal of psychology.

[29]  G. Sperling.  A Model for Visual Memory Tasks1 , 1963, Human factors.

[30]  Friedman Sm,et al.  REVERSAL READING BY ISRAELI OBSERVERS OF VISUAL PATTERNS WITHOUT INTRINSIC DIRECTIONALITY. , 1963 .

[31]  Ralph Norman Haber,et al.  Processing of sequentially presented letters , 1969 .

[32]  E. R. Harcum.  Perceptual serial-position curves with a frequently isolated element. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[33]  Marylin C. Smith,et al.  Elimination of visual field effects by use of a single report technique: Evidence for order-of-report artifact. , 1971 .

[34]  E. Warrington,et al.  Further Studies on the Masking of brief Visual Stimuli by a Random Pattern , 1962 .

[35]  M Coltheart,et al.  Evidence for an Integration Theory of Visual Masking , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  Paul Fraisse,et al.  Visual perceptive simultaneity and masking of letters successively presented , 1966 .

[37]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  A multicomponent theory of the perception of briefly exposed visual displays , 1970 .

[38]  D. Kahneman.  Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  Bryden Mp,et al.  Tachistoscopic recognition of non-alphabetical material. , 1960 .

[40]  G. Sperling.  Visual information storage , 1961 .

[41]  D. J. K. Mewhort,et al.  On the transfer from iconic to short-term memory , 1969 .

[42]  R. Goldman,et al.  Left-right differences in tachistoscopic recognition as a function of order of report, expectancy, and training , 1969 .

[43]  N. Weisstein,et al.  A u-shaped backward masking function in vision , 1965 .

[44]  E. R. Harcum,et al.  Effect of Pre-Known Stimulus-Reversals on Apparent Cerebral Dominance in Word Recognition , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[45]  W. Heron,et al.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[46]  Harcum Er.  Hemifield differences in visual perception of redundant stimuli. , 1968, Canadian journal of psychology.

[47]  Harcum Er.  EFFECTS OF SYMMETRY ON THE PERCEPTION OF TACHISTOSCOPIC PATTERNS. , 1964 .

[48]  J. Ayres,et al.  Some artifactual causes of perceptual primacy. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[49]  Phillip Liss,et al.  Does backward masking by visual noise stop stimulus processing? , 1968 .

[50]  A. Baddeley.  Immediate Memory and the “Perception” of Letter Sequences , 1964 .

[51]  J. Deutsch.  Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[52]  Mewhort Dj.  Scanning chunking, and the familiarity effect in tachistoscopic recognition. , 1972 .

[53]  T. G. R. Bower,et al.  Visual selection: Scanning vs filtering , 1965 .

[54]  D J Mewhort,et al.  Sequential redundancy and letter spacing as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition. , 1966, Canadian journal of psychology.

[55]  E. R. Harcum,et al.  Explanation of Mishkin and Forgays' result as a directional-reading conflict. , 1963, Canadian journal of psychology.

[56]  Dick Ao,et al.  Parellel and serial processing in tachistoscopic recognition: two mechanisms. , 1972 .

[57]  H. R. Crosland,et al.  A Method of Measuring the Effect of Primacy of Report in the Range of Attention Experiment , 1933 .