Experiences and Insights from the Collection of a Novel Multimedia EEG Dataset

There is a growing interest in utilising novel signal sources such as EEG (Electroencephalography) in multimedia research. When using such signals, subtle limitations are often not readily apparent without significant domain expertise. Multimedia research outputs incorporating EEG signals can fail to be replicated when only minor modifications have been made to an experiment or seemingly unimportant (or unstated) details are changed. This can lead to overoptimistic or overpessimistic viewpoints on the potential real-world utility of these signals in multimedia research activities. This paper describes an EEG/MM dataset and presents a summary of distilled experiences and knowledge gained during the preparation (and utilisiation) of the dataset that supported a collaborative neural-image labelling benchmarking task. The goal of this task was to collaboratively identify machine learning approaches that would support the use of EEG signals in areas such as image labelling and multimedia modeling or retrieval. The contributions of this paper can be listed thus; a template experimental paradigm is proposed (along with datasets and a baseline system) upon which researchers can explore multimedia image labelling using a brain-computer interface, learnings regarding commonly encountered issues (and useful signals) when conducting research that utilises EEG in multimedia contexts are provided, and finally insights are shared on how an EEG dataset was used to support a collaborative neural-image labelling benchmarking task and the valuable experiences gained.

[1]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  An EEG Image-search dataset: a first-of-its-kind in IR/IIR. NAILS: neurally augmented image labelling strategies , 2017 .

[2]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[3]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  An investigation of triggering approaches for the rapid serial visual presentation paradigm in brain computer interfacing , 2016, 2016 27th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC).

[4]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Informed Perspectives on Human Annotation Using Neural Signals , 2016, MMM.

[5]  Bolei Zhou,et al.  Places: An Image Database for Deep Scene Understanding , 2016, ArXiv.

[6]  Sayeed A. D. Kizuk,et al.  High and dry? Comparing active dry EEG electrodes to active and passive wet electrodes. , 2017, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Brent Lance,et al.  EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[11]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Systematic comparison between a wireless EEG system with dry electrodes and a wired EEG system with wet electrodes , 2019, NeuroImage.

[12]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Real-time neuroimaging and cognitive monitoring using wearable dry EEG , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  S. Luck An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[14]  Frédéric Jurie,et al.  Vehicle detection in aerial imagery : A small target detection benchmark , 2016, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[15]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Eye fixation related potentials in a target search task , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  Rami Albatal,et al.  NTCIR Lifelog: The First Test Collection for Lifelog Research , 2016, SIGIR.

[17]  D. Kault,et al.  Fast versus slow bandaid removal: a randomised trial , 2009, The Medical journal of Australia.

[18]  Anthony J. Ries,et al.  The effect of target and non-target similarity on neural classification performance: a boost from confidence , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[19]  Stephen Darling,et al.  Intraindividual reaction time variability affects P300 amplitude rather than latency , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[21]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  Closing the loop in cortically-coupled computer vision: a brain–computer interface for searching image databases , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  Thierry Pun,et al.  DEAP: A Database for Emotion Analysis ;Using Physiological Signals , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[23]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Use of Neural Signals to Evaluate the Quality of Generative Adversarial Network Performance in Facial Image Generation , 2018, Cognitive Computation.

[24]  J Polich,et al.  Comparison of P300 from passive and active tasks for auditory and visual stimuli. , 1999, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.