Hydrogen production by steam gasification of polypropylene with various nickel catalysts

Abstract Several nickel-based catalysts (Ni/Al2O3, Ni/MgO, Ni/CeO2, Ni/ZSM-5, Ni-Al, Ni-Mg-Al and Ni/CeO2/Al2O3) have been prepared and investigated for their suitability for the production of hydrogen from the two-stage pyrolysis–gasification of polypropylene. Experiments were conducted at a pyrolysis temperature of 500 °C and gasification temperature was kept constant at 800 °C with a catalyst/polypropylene ratio of 0.5. Fresh and reacted catalysts were characterized using a variety of methods, including, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry and transmission electron microscopy. The results showed that Ni/Al2O3 was deactivated by two types of carbons (monoatomic carbons and filamentous carbons) with a total coke deposition of 11.2 wt.% after reaction, although it showed to be an effective catalyst for the production of hydrogen with a production of 26.7 wt.% of the theoretical yield of hydrogen from that available in the polypropylene. The Ni/MgO catalyst showed low catalytic activity for H2 production, which might be due to the formation of monoatomic carbons on the surface of the catalyst, blocking the access of gaseous products to the catalyst. Ni-Al (1:2) and Ni-Mg-Al (1:1:2) catalysts prepared by co-precipitation showed good catalytic abilities in terms of both H2 production and prevention of coke formation. The ZSM-5 zeolite with higher surface area was also shown to be a good support for the nickel-based catalyst, since, the Ni/ZSM-5 catalyst showed a high rate of hydrogen production (44.3 wt.% of theoretical) from the pyrolysis–gasification of polypropylene.

[1]  B. Kelleher,et al.  Review of literature on catalysts for biomass gasification , 2001 .

[2]  Claude Mirodatos,et al.  Hydrogen production from crude pyrolysis oil by a sequential catalytic process , 2007 .

[3]  S. Takenaka,et al.  Structural change of Ni species during the methane decomposition and the subsequent gasification of deposited carbon with CO2 over supported Ni catalysts , 2003 .

[4]  L. García,et al.  The effect of lanthanum on Ni–Al catalyst for catalytic steam gasification of pine sawdust , 2004 .

[5]  C. Courson,et al.  Development of Ni catalysts for gas production from biomass gasification. Reactivity in steam- and dry-reforming , 2000 .

[6]  Takeo Kimura,et al.  Catalytic performance of supported Ni catalysts in partial oxidation and steam reforming of tar derived from the pyrolysis of wood biomass , 2006 .

[7]  Krister Sjöström,et al.  Biomass gasification in a laboratory-scale AFBG: influence of the location of the feeding point on the fuel-N conversion , 2000 .

[8]  María L. Salvador,et al.  Catalytic Steam Gasification of Pine Sawdust. Effect of Catalyst Weight/Biomass Flow Rate and Steam/Biomass Ratios on Gas Production and Composition , 1999 .

[9]  C. M. Kinoshita,et al.  An experimental investigation of hydrogen production from biomass gasification , 1998 .

[10]  Stefan Czernik,et al.  Production of Hydrogen from Plastics by Pyrolysis and Catalytic Steam Reform , 2006 .

[11]  David L. Trimm,et al.  Coke formation and minimisation during steam reforming reactions , 1997 .

[12]  F. Trifiró,et al.  Preparation and characterization of nickel-aluminum mixed oxides obtained by thermal decomposition of hydrotalcite-type precursors , 1992 .

[13]  Rui Xiao,et al.  Air gasification of polypropylene plastic waste in fluidized bed gasifier , 2007 .

[14]  A. Kiennemann,et al.  Development of catalysts suitable for hydrogen or syn-gas production from biomass gasification , 2002 .

[15]  Gao Qing Lu,et al.  A Comprehensive Study on Carbon Dioxide Reforming of Methane over Ni/γ-Al2O3 Catalysts , 1999 .

[16]  L. García,et al.  Hydrogen production by steam gasification of biomass using Ni-Al coprecipitated catalysts promoted with magnesium , 2002 .

[17]  Gerrit Brem,et al.  Review of Catalysts for Tar Elimination in Biomass Gasification Processes , 2004 .

[18]  N. Itoh,et al.  Effect of Water Density on the Gasification of Lignin with Magnesium Oxide Supported Nickel Catalysts in Supercritical Water , 2006 .

[19]  Jesús Arauzo,et al.  Catalytic pyrogasification of biomass. Evaluation of modified nickel catalysts , 1997 .

[20]  M. Gazzano,et al.  Preparation and thermal reactivity of nickel/chromium and nickel/aluminium hydrotalcite-type precursors , 1991 .

[21]  Pekka Simell,et al.  Effects of gasification gas components on tar and ammonia decomposition over hot gas cleanup catalysts , 1997 .

[22]  Shaobin Wang,et al.  Role of CeO2 in Ni/CeO2–Al2O3 catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane , 1998 .

[23]  José Corella,et al.  Commercial steam reforming catalysts to improve biomass gasification with steam-oxygen mixtures. 2: Catalytic tar removal , 1998 .

[24]  N. Itoh,et al.  Hydrogen production from the gasification of lignin with nickel catalysts in supercritical water , 2007 .

[25]  K. Murata,et al.  Hydrogen production by gasification of cellulose over Ni catalysts supported on zeolites , 2006 .

[26]  Mohammad Asadullah,et al.  Demonstration of real biomass gasification drastically promoted by effective catalyst , 2003 .

[27]  Stefan Czernik,et al.  Hydrogen by Catalytic Steam Reforming of Liquid Byproducts from Biomass Thermoconversion Processes , 2002 .