Coupled physical and biological modeling of the spring bloom in the North Atlantic (I): model formulation and one dimensional bloom processes

This is the first of two papers that introduce a mesoscale eddy resolving coupled physical and biological model system. The physical model consists of a quasigeostrophic interior with a fully coupled surface boundary layer. The nitrogen based biological model includes nitrate, phytoplankton, heterotroph and ammonium fields. This interdisciplinary model system is used to examine aspects of the 1989 JGOFS North Atlantic Bloom Experiment data set. This paper deals mainly with one dimensional processes and a companion paper addresses three dimensional phenomena. The data set consists of two time series of observations taken from different water masses in the mesoscale environment. The general features of the two time series are well represented by a one dimensional model when the mesoscale spatial variability in the initial condition is treated explicitly within the one dimensional framework. However, a significant bias is evident in the first time series as the sampling pattern began in a warm feature and moved toward colder ones. Mistaking spatial for temporal variability in this case results in an apparent sink of heat and source of nitrate in the data. Removing this bias with the one dimensional model results in an f-ratio that is almost a factor of two higher (0.64) than computed by other authors based on nutrient inventories and primary productivity measurements (0.37). The second time series was conducted in the interior of a mesoscale feature and spatial biasing is minimal. The model forms a seasonal thermocline and nitracline that compare quite well with the data in both magnitude and vertical extent. A subsurface ammonium maximum is generated by the model from an initially homogeneous profile that also agrees well with the data. Simulated primary productivity profiles match 14C incubations except on the final day of the simulation when surface nutrients appear in to have been exhausted slightly prematurely. Computed f-ratios are consistent with independent estimates based on uptake measurements. A systematic parameter dependence and sensitivity analysis is carried out on these results. The most sensitive parameters are the phytoplankton and heterotroph maximum growth rates. Detailed analysis of the behavior of the system indicates tight coupling between phytoplankton production and heterotrophic consumption even in the early stages of the bloom.

[1]  P. M. Holligan,et al.  The spatial and temporal development of the spring phytoplankton bloom in the Celtic Sea, April 1979 , 1983 .

[2]  T Platt,et al.  Photo inhibition of photosynthesis in natural assemblages of marine phyto plankton , 1980 .

[3]  H. Ducklow,et al.  Introduction to the JGOFS North Atlantic bloom experiment , 1993 .

[4]  P. Wheeler,et al.  Ammonium recycling limits nitrate use in the oceanic subarctic Pacific , 1990 .

[5]  John D. Woods,et al.  Scale Upwelling and Primary Production , 1988 .

[6]  A. Devol,et al.  Nitrogen in the Marine Environment , 1985 .

[7]  B. Osborne,et al.  Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems. , 1985 .

[8]  Allan R. Robinson,et al.  A coupled surface boundary-layer-quasigeostrophic model , 1993 .

[9]  John H. Steele,et al.  A Simple Plankton Model , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[10]  H. Ducklow,et al.  The carbon balance during the 1989 spring bloom in the North Atlantic Ocean, 47°N, 20°W , 1992 .

[11]  S. J. Tanner,et al.  Iron, primary production and carbon-nitrogen flux studies during the JGOFS North Atlantic bloom experiment , 1993 .

[12]  D. M. Glover,et al.  Estimates of wintertime mixed layer nutrient concentrations in the North Atlantic , 1988 .

[13]  R. Eppley,et al.  Biological nitrogen cycling in the nitracline , 1989 .

[14]  Willem H. Buiter,et al.  Cambridge, MA 02138 , 1987 .

[15]  Roland W. Garwood,et al.  An Oceanic Mixed Layer Model Capable of Simulating Cyclic States , 1977 .

[16]  J. Wroblewski,et al.  A model of phytoplankton plume formation during variable Oregon upwelling , 1977 .

[17]  P. J. Syrett Nitrogen metabolism of microalgae , 1981 .

[18]  A. Alldredge,et al.  Direct observations of the mass flocculation of diatom blooms: characteristics, settling velocities and formation of diatom aggregates , 1989 .

[19]  Frank E. Hoge,et al.  Mesoscale and upper ocean variabilities during the 1989 JGOFS bloom study , 1993 .

[20]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Utilization of nitrogen and phosphorus by primary producers in warm-core ring 82-B following deep convective mixing , 1986 .

[21]  H. Ducklow,et al.  A nitrogen-based model of plankton dynamics in the oceanic mixed layer , 1990 .

[22]  E. Wada,et al.  NITRITE METABOLISM IN THE EUPHOTIC LAYER OF THE CENTRAL NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN1 , 1971 .

[23]  C. Lorenzen Extinction of Light in the Ocean by Phytoplankton , 1972 .

[24]  J. W. Stevenson The seasonal variation of the surface mixed-layer response to the vertical motions of linear Rossby waves , 1983 .

[25]  P. Bienfang Sinking rates of heterogeneous, temperate phytoplankton populations , 1981 .

[26]  P. Klein,et al.  Mesoscale heterogeneity of the wind-driven mixed layer: Influence of a quasigeostrophic flow , 1988 .

[27]  Carolyn A. Miller,et al.  The trophic role of mesozooplankton at 47°N, 20°W during the North Atlantic Bloom Experiment , 1993 .

[28]  A. E. Gill Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics , 1982 .

[29]  J. Marra,et al.  Initiation of the spring bloom in the northeast Atlantic (47°N, 20°W): a numerical simulation , 1993 .

[30]  J. Steele,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity and Population Stability , 1974, Nature.

[31]  H. Sverdrup,et al.  On Conditions for the Vernal Blooming of Phytoplankton , 1953 .

[32]  E. Stewart,et al.  Ingestion by planktonic grazers as a function of concentration of food1 , 1975 .

[33]  Allan R. Robinson,et al.  Coupled physical and biological modelling of the spring bloom in the North Atlantic (II): three dimensional bloom and post-bloom processes , 1995 .

[34]  Trevor Platt,et al.  Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in natural assemblages of marine phytoplankton , 1980 .

[35]  G. M. Capriulo Ecology of Marine Protozoa , 1990 .

[36]  J. C. Goldman,et al.  Chapter 7 – KINETICS OF INORGANIC NITROGEN UPTAKE BY PHYTOPLANKTON , 1983 .

[37]  O. Zafiriou,et al.  Nitrification and nitric oxide in the oxygen minimum of the eastern tropical North Pacific , 1988 .

[38]  B. Ward Nitrogen transformations in the Southern California Bight , 1987 .

[39]  Timothy R. Parsons,et al.  Biological Oceanographic Processes , 1973 .

[40]  C. Garside,et al.  The “f-ratio” on 20°W during the North Atlantic Bloom Experiment , 1993 .

[41]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[42]  Brian J. Rothschild,et al.  Toward a theory on biological-physical interactions in the world ocean , 1988 .