How Attention Changes in Response to Incentives

Although the performance of simple cognitive tasks can be enhanced if an incentive is provided, the mechanisms enabling such motivational control are not known. This study sought to uncover how mechanisms of attention and readiness are altered by reward-associated incentive stimuli. We measured EEG/ERP activity as human adults viewed a high- or low-incentive cue, experienced a short preparation interval, and then performed a simple visual search task to gain the predicted reward. Search performance was faster with high versus low incentives, and this was accompanied by distinct incentive-related EEG/ERP patterns at each phase of the task (incentive, preparation, and search). First, and most surprisingly, attention to high but not low incentive cues was actively suppressed, as indexed by a PD component in response to the incentive display. During the subsequent preparation interval, neural oscillations in the alpha frequency range were reduced after high-incentive cues, indicating heightened visual readiness. Finally, attentional orienting to the target in the search array was deployed with relatively little effort on high-incentive trials, as indexed by a reduced N2pc component. These results reveal the chain of events by which the brain's executive control mechanisms respond to incentives by altering the operation of multiple processing systems to produce optimal performance.

[1]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Learned Predictiveness Speeds Visual Processing , 2012, Psychological science.

[2]  M. D. Ernst Permutation Methods: A Basis for Exact Inference , 2004 .

[3]  O. Jensen,et al.  Modulation of Gamma and Alpha Activity during a Working Memory Task Engaging the Dorsal or Ventral Stream , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate , 2022 .

[5]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  O. Jensen,et al.  Prestimulus alpha and mu activity predicts failure to inhibit motor responses , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[7]  K. Berridge From prediction error to incentive salience: mesolimbic computation of reward motivation , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  "Motivation sharpens exogenous spatial attention": Correction to Engelmann and Pessoa (2007). , 2007 .

[9]  Roshan Cools,et al.  Region-specific modulations in oscillatory alpha activity serve to facilitate processing in the visual and auditory modalities , 2014, NeuroImage.

[10]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Monetary incentives enhance processing in brain regions mediating top-down control of attention. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  A. Karim,et al.  Brain Oscillatory Substrates of Visual Short-Term Memory Capacity , 2009, Current Biology.

[13]  J. Raymond,et al.  Selective Visual Attention and Motivation , 2009, Psychological science.

[14]  Anders Petersen,et al.  Attentional Capture by Salient Distractors during Visual Search Is Determined by Temporal Task Demands , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  P. Berg,et al.  Ocular artifacts in EEG and event-related potentials I: Scalp topography , 2005, Brain Topography.

[16]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Distractors associated with reward break through the focus of attention , 2016, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[17]  S. Luck,et al.  Attention to Features Precedes Attention to Locations in Visual Search: Evidence from Electromagnetic Brain Responses in Humans , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[19]  Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin,et al.  Dopamine in Motivational Control: Rewarding, Aversive, and Alerting , 2010, Neuron.

[20]  S. Luck,et al.  A Common Neural Mechanism for Preventing and Terminating the Allocation of Attention , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Visual and auditory alertness: modality-specific and supramodal neural mechanisms and their modulation by nicotine. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Serial deployment of attention during visual search. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of the Focusing of Attention within Complex Visual Scenes: N2pc and Related ERP Components , 2011 .

[24]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reward Priority of Visual Target Singletons Modulates Event-Related Potential Signatures of Attentional Selection , 2009, Psychological science.

[25]  Guideline Thirteen: Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature , 1994, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[26]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[27]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  RETRACTED: Electrophysiological Evidence for Failures of Item Individuation in Crowded Visual Displays , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  R. Henson Neuroimaging studies of priming , 2003, Progress in Neurobiology.

[29]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  Mark J. Edwards,et al.  Motivation and movement: the effect of monetary incentive on performance speed , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  S. Luck,et al.  The neural site of attention matches the spatial scale of perception , 2010 .

[32]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[33]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  The distractor positivity (Pd) signals lowering of attentional priority: evidence from event-related potentials and individual differences. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[34]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[36]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Active suppression after involuntary capture of attention , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[37]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  S. Luck,et al.  On the role of selective attention in visual perception. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[40]  John M. Gaspar,et al.  Suppression of Salient Objects Prevents Distraction in Visual Search , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Vincent Di Lollo,et al.  Electrophysiological Indices of Target and Distractor Processing in Visual Search , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[43]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Object Priming in Humans Revealed by Rapid Presentation Event-Related fMRI , 1998, Neuron.

[44]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[45]  E. Milne,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of Atypical Spatial Attention in Those with a High Level of Self-reported Autistic Traits , 2016, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.