Smart Business for Smart Users: A Social Agenda for Developing Smart Grids

The promise of smart grids is very attractive. However, it is not yet clear what the future smart grid will look like. Although most researchers acknowledge that users will play a more prominent role in smart grids, there is a lot of uncertainty on this issue. To counter the strong technological bias in smart grid research and literature, we propose that research should focus more on the social and business dimension of smart grid developments. The main elements of such a research agenda are: Developing more socially embedded visions on smart grids and the services it will provide A shift in the focus on developing smart grids components and systems towards the services it will deliver Development and testing of innovative user-centered business models and ecosystems. More general, on the role of users in smart grids, the main lesson is that user roles should be taken more seriously in relation to smart grids: experts should no longer regard users exclusively and/or simply as potential barriers to smart grid innovation but also as important stakeholders and potential participants in the innovation process.

[1]  Peter Asmus.  Exploring New Models of Solar Energy Development , 2008 .

[2]  E. Shove,et al.  Consumers, Producers and Practices , 2005 .

[3]  M. Wolsink.  The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources , 2012 .

[4]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management , 2014 .

[5]  Andreas Reckwitz.  Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[6]  B. Truffer,et al.  Market Formation in Technological Innovation Systems—Diffusion of Photovoltaic Applications in Germany , 2011 .

[7]  Eleftheria Vasileiadou,et al.  Three is a crowd? Exploring the potential of crowdfunding for renewable energy in the Netherlands , 2016 .

[8]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[9]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .

[10]  The introduction of local system services in the electricity market : the case of storage in the low voltage network , 2010 .

[11]  G. Seyfang,et al.  Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda , 2007 .

[12]  Ji Johanna Höffken.  Power to the people? : civic engagement with small-scale hydroelectric plants in India , 2007 .

[13]  Gordon Walker,et al.  What Is Energy For? Social Practice and Energy Demand , 2014 .

[14]  S. Woolgar.  Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .

[15]  G. Seyfang,et al.  Up, Down, round and round: Connecting Regimes and Practices in Innovation for Sustainability , 2013 .

[16]  G. Verbong,et al.  Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy , 2013 .

[17]  G. Fulli,et al.  A business case for Smart Grid technologies: A systemic perspective , 2011 .

[18]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[19]  Donna Heimiller,et al.  The transformation of southern California's residential photovoltaics market through third-party ownership , 2012 .

[20]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Business Model Generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers , 2010 .

[21]  R. Amit,et al.  The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research , 2011 .

[22]  H. Chesbrough.  Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers , 2010 .

[23]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change , 2011 .

[24]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960-2004) , 2007 .

[25]  A. Warde.  Consumption and Theories of Practice , 2005 .

[26]  A. Warde.  After taste: Culture, consumption and theories of practice , 2014 .

[27]  E. Hippel.  The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process , 1993 .

[28]  F. Boons,et al.  Business Models for Sustainable Innovation: State of the Art and Steps Towards a Research Agenda , 2013 .

[29]  Jccm Boukje Huijben,et al.  Breakthrough without subsidies? PV business model experiments in the Netherlands , 2013 .

[30]  Adrian Smith,et al.  A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK , 2013 .

[31]  Jörg Radtke,et al.  Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda , 2015 .

[32]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Standby Consumption in Households Analyzed With a Practice Theory Approach , 2009 .

[33]  T. Schatzki.  Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social , 1996 .

[34]  F. Geels,et al.  Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways , 2010 .

[35]  G. Walker,et al.  Carbon reduction, 'the public' and renewable energy: engaging with socio-technical configurations. , 2007 .

[36]  Joeri Naus,et al.  Smart grids, information flows and emerging domestic energy practices , 2014 .

[37]  Geert Verbong,et al.  The power of large technological visions : the promise of hydrogen energy (1970-2010) , 2006 .

[38]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science , 2014, Sustainability Science.