BackgroundThe International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is a classification of health and health-related issues, aimed at describing and measuring health and disability at both individual and population levels. Here we discuss a preliminary qualitative and quantitative analysis of the relationships used in the Activities and Participation component of ICF, and a preliminary mapping to SUMO (Suggested Upper Merged Ontology) concepts. The aim of the analysis is to identify potential logical problems within this component of ICF, and to understand whether activities and participation might be defined more formally than in the current version of ICF.ResultsIn the relationship analysis, we used four predicates among those available in SUMO for processes (Patient, Instrument, Agent, and subProcess). While at the top level subsumption was used in most cases (90%), at the lower levels the percentage of other relationships rose to 41%. Chapters were heterogeneous in the relationships used and some of the leaves of the tree seemed to represent properties or parts of the parent concept rather than subclasses. Mapping of ICF to SUMO proved partially feasible, with the activity concepts being mapped mostly (but not totally) under the IntentionalProcess concept in SUMO. On the other hand, the participation concept has not been mapped to any upper level concept.ConclusionsOur analysis of the relationships within ICF revealed issues related to confusion between classes and their properties, incorrect classifications, and overemphasis on subsumption, confirming what already observed by other researchers. However, it also suggested some properties for Activities that could be included in a more formal model: number of agents involved, the instrument used to carry out the activity, the object of the activity, complexity of the task, and an enumeration of relevant subtasks.
[1]
Nicola Guarino,et al.
Formal Ontology and Information Systems
,
1998
.
[2]
Tóra H Dahl.
International classification of functioning, disability and health: an introduction and discussion of its potential impact on rehabilitation services and research.
,
2002,
Journal of rehabilitation medicine.
[3]
Pieter E. Zanstra,et al.
ClaML: A standard for the electronic publication of classification coding schemes
,
2006,
MIE.
[4]
Adam Pease,et al.
Towards a standard upper ontology
,
2001,
FOIS.
[5]
N. Guarino,et al.
Formal Ontology in Information Systems : Proceedings of the First International Conference(FOIS'98), June 6-8, Trento, Italy
,
1998
.
[6]
Cédric Bousquet,et al.
Using the CEN/ISO Standard for Categorial Structure to Harmonise the
,
2009,
MIE.
[7]
György Surján,et al.
Ontological analysis of SNOMED CT
,
2008,
BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..
[8]
A. Williams,et al.
International classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF-CY World Health Organization
,
2013
.
[9]
Adam Pease,et al.
Mapping WordNet to the SUMO Ontology
,
2003
.
[10]
Christiane Fellbaum,et al.
Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database
,
1999,
CL.
[11]
Barry Smith,et al.
The Ontology of Processes and Functions: A Study of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
,
2007
.