Low-Complexity, Distributed Characterization of Interferers in Wireless Networks

We consider a large-scale wireless network that uses sensors along its edge to estimate the characteristics of interference from neighboring networks or devices. Each sensor makes a noisy measurement of the received signal strength (RSS) from an interferer, compares its measurement to a threshold, and then transmits the resulting bit to a cluster head (CH) over a noisy communication channel. The CH computes the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) of the distance to the interferer using these noise-corrupted bits. We propose and justify a low-complexity threshold design technique in which the sensors use nonidentical thresholds to generate their bits. This produces a dithering effect that provides better performance than previous techniques that use different non-identical thresholds or the case in which all the sensor motes use an identical non-optimal threshold. Our proposed technique is also shown (a) to be of low complexity compared to previous non-identical threshold approaches and (b) to provide performance that is very close to that obtained when all sensors use the identical, but unknown, optimal threshold. We derive the Cramér-Rao bound (CRB) and also show that the MLE using our dithered thresholds is asymptotically both efficient and consistent. Simulations are used to verify these theoretical results.

[1]  Catherine Rosenberg,et al.  The development and eStadium testbeds for research and development of wireless services for large-scale sports venues , 2006, 2nd International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities, 2006. TRIDENTCOM 2006..

[2]  E. L. Lehmann,et al.  Theory of point estimation , 1950 .

[3]  E. Visotsky,et al.  On collaborative detection of TV transmissions in support of dynamic spectrum sharing , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[4]  P.K. Varshney,et al.  Target Location Estimation in Sensor Networks With Quantized Data , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  J.K. Nelson,et al.  Global Optimization for Multiple Transmitter Localization , 2006, MILCOM 2006 - 2006 IEEE Military Communications conference.

[6]  Alejandro Ribeiro,et al.  Bandwidth-constrained distributed estimation for wireless sensor networks-part II: unknown probability density function , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[7]  Edward J. Coyle,et al.  Distributed Iterative Quantization for Interference Characterization in Wireless Networks , 2010, ICC.

[8]  Alex Hills Smart Wi-Fi. , 2005, Scientific American.

[9]  Alejandro Ribeiro,et al.  Bandwidth-constrained distributed estimation for wireless sensor Networks-part I: Gaussian case , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  James V. Krogmeier,et al.  eStadium: The Mobile Wireless Football Experience , 2008, 2008 Third International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services.

[11]  Xin Liu Sensing-based opportunistic channel access , .

[12]  Edward J. Coyle,et al.  Spatio-temporal sampling rates and energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[13]  Amir Ghasemi,et al.  Asymptotic performance of collaborative spectrum sensing under correlated log-normal shadowing , 2007, IEEE Communications Letters.

[14]  Steven Kay,et al.  Fundamentals Of Statistical Signal Processing , 2001 .

[15]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Estimation Diversity and Energy Efficiency in Distributed Sensing , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Kenneth E. Barner,et al.  Constrained Decentralized Estimation Over Noisy Channels for Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[18]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Cognitive Wireless Mesh Networks with Dynamic Spectrum Access , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[19]  Henry Tirri,et al.  A Statistical Modeling Approach to Location Estimation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[20]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  Universal decentralized estimation in a bandwidth constrained sensor network , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[21]  Xuan Zhong,et al.  eStadium: a Wireless "Living Lab" for Safety and Infotainment Applications , 2006, 2006 First International Conference on Communications and Networking in China.

[22]  Kenneth E. Barner,et al.  Sensor Data Cryptography in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[23]  Aleksandar Dogandzic,et al.  Nonparametric Probability Density Estimation for Sensor Networks Using Quantized Measurements , 2007, 2007 41st Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[24]  Kenneth E. Barner,et al.  Blind decentralized estimation for bandwidth constrained wireless sensor networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[25]  Ronald A. Thisted,et al.  Elements of statistical computing , 1986 .

[26]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Channel Aware Target Localization With Quantized Data in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[27]  Maya R. Gupta,et al.  An EM Technique for Multiple Transmitter Localization , 2007, 2007 41st Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[28]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Power scheduling of universal decentralized estimation in sensor networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[29]  Zhi-Quan Luo,et al.  Decentralized estimation in an inhomogeneous sensing environment , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.