Understanding the domain of counterproductive work behaviour in China

Current conceptualizations of employee job performance in the Western literature include task performance, organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), and counterproductive work behaviour (CWB). Limited research has investigated the cross-cultural generalizability of these categories or their content. Convergence and divergence theorists present competing perspectives on the cross-cultural applicability of Western management practices. The growing role of China in the world economy makes this culture an important one to consider. The present study contributes to job performance research in two important ways. First, Study 1 investigates whether CWB in China is described by similar or different behaviours as in the Western literature. Second, Study 2 examines the importance that Chinese managers place on task performance, OCB, and CWB. Findings indicate that Chinese managers are similar to North American managers in the content of CWB. Furthermore, Chinese managers value all three groups of behaviours when rating overall performance, placing greater emphasis on task performance and less emphasis on CWB than North American managers. The results suggest that cross-cultural research on job performance needs to take both convergence and divergence perspectives into account.

[1]  C. M. Tashman Dictionary of Occupational Titles , 2008 .

[2]  Paul Wentges,et al.  Editorial for the Special Section , 2006 .

[3]  C. Vance Strategic Upstream and Downstream Considerations for Effective Global Performance Management , 2006 .

[4]  Wing Tung Au,et al.  Normative controls and self-reported counterproductive behaviors in the workplace in China , 2005 .

[5]  Jiing-Lih Farh,et al.  Special Issue on Corporate Transformation in the People's Republic of China: Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the People's Republic of China , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[6]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  Investigating the Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behavior , 2003 .

[7]  Bernd Marcus,et al.  Measuring Counterproductivity: Development and Initial Validation of a German Self-Report Questionnaire , 2002 .

[8]  M. Rotundo The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: a policy-capturing approach. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  S. Khilji,et al.  Modes of convergence and divergence: an integrative view of multinational practices in Pakistan , 2002 .

[10]  Ming-Jer Chen Inside Chinese Business : A Guide for Managers Worldwide , 2001 .

[11]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  CHINESE AND AMERICAN MANAGERS' COMPENSATION AWARD DECISIONS: A COMPARATIVE POLICY‐CAPTURING STUDY , 2001 .

[12]  R. Bennett,et al.  Development of a measure of workplace deviance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  G. Johns,et al.  Interactive effects of absence culture salience and group cohesiveness: A multi‐level and cross‐level analysis of work absenteeism in the Chinese context , 2000 .

[14]  G. Johns,et al.  Perceptions of absence from work: People's Republic of China versus Canada. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and , 1997 .

[16]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  Organizational Spontaneity in Context , 1997 .

[17]  O. Shenkar,et al.  Management in China during the age of reform , 1996 .

[18]  S. T. Hunt,et al.  GENERIC WORK BEHAVIOR: AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE DIMENSIONS OF ENTRY-LEVEL, HOURLY JOB PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[19]  D. Organ,et al.  A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW OF ATTITUDINAL AND DISPOSITIONAL PREDICTORS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR , 1995 .

[20]  Chao-chuan Chen,et al.  New Trends in Rewards Allocation Preferences: A Sino-U.S. Comparison , 1995 .

[21]  R. Bennett,et al.  A TYPOLOGY OF DEVIANT WORKPLACE BEHAVIORS: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING STUDY , 1995 .

[22]  Joseph A. Raelin,et al.  Three scales of professional deviance within organizations , 1994 .

[23]  P. Earley Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. , 1994 .

[24]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  More Progress Toward a Taxonomy of Managerial Performance Requirements , 1993 .

[25]  J. Thayer,et al.  Time urgency: the construct and its measurement. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Dimensions of Job Performance , 1988 .

[27]  F. W. Gibson,et al.  Policy capturing as an approach to understanding and improving performance appraisal: a review of the literature. , 1983, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[28]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 1981 .

[29]  F. W. Gibson,et al.  Clarifying Performance Appraisal Criteria , 1981 .

[30]  S. Zedeck,et al.  Capturing rater policies for processing evaluation data. , 1977, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[31]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[32]  Helen De Cieri,et al.  Reassessment of convergence and divergence dynamics: implications for international HRM , 1999 .

[33]  R. Brislin Understanding culture's influence on behavior , 1993 .

[34]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[35]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[36]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[37]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  The social psychology of Chinese people. , 1986 .

[38]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  The Psychology of the Chinese people , 1986 .

[39]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[40]  R. Brislin Cross-cultural research methods , 1973 .