Comparing polynomial and cubic spline interpolation of segment angles for estimating L5/S1 net moment during symmetric lifting tasks.

Simple video-based methods previously proposed for field research to estimate L5/S1 net moments during real-world manual materials handling rely on polynomial interpolation on the joint angles from key frames extracted from video recordings; however, polynomial interpolations may not converge as the number of interpolation points increases. Therefore, we compared L5/S1 net moments calculated from continuous kinematic measurements to those calculated from both polynomial and cubic spline interpolation on body segments angles during lifting tasks. For small number of interpolation points (<6) the error in the predicted moment from both the spline and polynomial fits decreased with the increase in the number of interpolation points; however, above 6 interpolation points error for the polynomial fits started to increase while the error from the spline fit continued to decrease. These results suggest that cubic spline interpolation on body segments angles provides a more robust basis for calculating L5/S1 net moment from a few key video frames.

[1]  R W Norman,et al.  Dynamically and statically determined low back moments during lifting. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  I. Kingma,et al.  Validation of a full body 3-D dynamic linked segment model , 1996 .

[3]  A M Genaidy,et al.  Spinal compression tolerance limits for the design of manual material handling operations in the workplace. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[4]  R W Norman,et al.  A simple polynomial that predicts low-back compression during complex 3-D tasks. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[5]  Patrick G. Dempsey,et al.  A computerized video coding system for biomechanical analysis of lifting tasks , 2003 .

[6]  A Mital,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of manual lifting tasks. , 1987, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  K P Granata,et al.  Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[8]  Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Biomechanics of Changes in Lumbar Posture in Static Lifting , 2005, Spine.

[9]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A computerized biomechanical model-development of and use in studying gross body actions. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J. Stoer,et al.  Introduction to Numerical Analysis , 2002 .

[11]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A dynamic biomechanical evaluation of lifting maximum acceptable loads. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  M. W.S.,et al.  Occupational low back disorder causation and control , 2001 .

[13]  S M Hsiang,et al.  Video based lifting technique coding system. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[14]  Cheng-Kung Cheng,et al.  A three-dimensional static torso model for the six human lumbar joints , 1991 .