The Role of Fuzzy and Genetic Algorithms in Part Family Formation and Sequence Optimisation for Flexible Manufacturing Systems

Group technology (GT) is one of the key issues in the successful implementation of flexible manufacturing systems (FMSs). The success of GT implementation is in the effective formation of part families (PFs) and similarity coefficients measures. Over the past three decades, many similarity coefficients have been proposed, but a better similarity coefficient measure is required. The decision-making process in a manufacturing system often involves uncertainties and ambiguities. Under such circumstances, fuzzy methodologies have proved to be an effective tool for taking fuzziness into consideration. The first part of this paper deals with the fuzzy part-family formation. This was achieved in the following ways:1. A new similarity coefficient measure has been developed and this coefficient measure is used to form a part-family.2. A mathematical model that uses this similarity coefficient for solving the part-family formation problems optimally in an FMS is developed.The fuzzy approach has the special advantage of producing more accurate results than conventional clustering and other methods. It not only reveals the specific part family that a part belongs to, but also provides the degree of membership of a part associated with each part family. This will give a balanced work load for the machine. In the second part of this paper, the introduction of the concept of genetic algorithms is proposed to eliminate more job sequences and, finally, the optimum sequence is obtained through the minimum penalty cost. Software is developed and implemented to obtain an optimum sequence and, finally, a numerical example is given as an illustration.

[1]  Lawrence. Davis,et al.  Handbook Of Genetic Algorithms , 1990 .

[2]  K. S. Ravichandran,et al.  A New Approach to Fuzzy Part-Family Formation in Cellular Manufacturing Systems , 2001 .

[3]  B. R. Sarker,et al.  Grouping efficiency measures in cellular manufacturing: A survey and critical review , 1999 .

[4]  F. Boctor A Jinear formulation of the machine-part cell formation problem , 1991 .

[5]  Bhaba R. Sarker,et al.  Measuring matrix-based cell formation with alternative routings , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  H. Charles Romesburg,et al.  Cluster analysis for researchers , 1984 .

[7]  B. Sarker,et al.  A similarity coefficient measure and machine-parts grouping in cellular manufacturing systems , 2000 .

[8]  A. Kusiak,et al.  Similarity coefficient algorithms for solving the group technology problem , 1992 .

[9]  Larry R. Taube,et al.  Weighted similarity measure heuristics for the group technology machine clustering problem , 1985 .

[10]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[11]  A. Vannelli,et al.  An eigenvector solution methodology for finding part-machine families , 1993 .

[12]  J. Guilford,et al.  A Note on the G Index of Agreement , 1964 .

[13]  Chao-Hsien Chu,et al.  A fuzzy clustering approach to manufacturing cell formation , 1991 .

[14]  Chao-Hsien Chu,et al.  A comparison of three array-based clustering techniques for manufacturing cell formation , 1990 .

[15]  Jerry C. Wei,et al.  Commonality analysis: A linear cell clustering algorithm for group technology , 1989 .

[16]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search , 1989 .

[17]  Moshe M. Barash,et al.  Design of a cellular manufacturing system: A syntactic pattern recognition approach , 1986 .

[18]  S. Sofianopoulou Application of simulated annealing to a linear model forthe formulation of machine cells ingroup technology , 1997 .

[19]  Anthony Vannelli,et al.  Strategic subcontracting for efficient disaggregated manufacturing , 1986 .

[20]  Shu Ming Ng,et al.  On the Characterization and Measure of Machine Cells in Group Technology , 1996, Oper. Res..

[21]  B. Sarker,et al.  A comparison of existing grouping efficiency measures and a new weighted grouping efficiency measure , 2001 .