Opportunity Cost Neglect

To properly consider the opportunity costs of a purchase, consumers must actively generate the alternatives that it would displace. The current research suggests that consumers often fail to do so. Even under conditions promoting cognitive effort, various cues to consider opportunity costs reduce purchase rates and increase the choice share of more affordable options. Sensitivity to such cues varies with chronic dispositional differences in spending attitudes. We discuss the implications of these results for the marketing strategies of economy and premium brands.

[1]  A. Young.  Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979) , 2011 .

[2]  Robert C. Merton,et al.  Samuelson, Paul A. , 2010 .

[3]  M. Staples,et al.  COST , 2009, European Review.

[4]  Ray Weaver,et al.  Transaction Disutility and the Endowment Effect , 2009 .

[5]  Ira Chernus.  The Chance for Peace , 2008 .

[6]  Richard H. Thaler,et al.  Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice , 1985, Mark. Sci..

[7]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Tightwads and Spendthrifts , 2007 .

[8]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Neural Predictors of Purchases , 2007, Neuron.

[9]  Vicki G. Morwitz,et al.  The Price of “Free”-dom: Consumer Sensitivity to Promotions with Negative Contextual Influences , 2006 .

[10]  D. Ariely,et al.  The Dissociation between Monetary Assessments and Predicted Utility , 2006 .

[11]  Ran Kivetz,et al.  Repenting Hyperopia: An Analysis of Self-Control Regrets , 2006 .

[12]  T. Brown.  Loss aversion without the endowment effect, and other explanations for the WTA-WTP disparity , 2005 .

[13]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Resource Slack and Propensity to Discount Delayed Investments of Time Versus Money , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Fault Trees: Sensitivity of Estimated Failure Probabilities to Problem Representation , 2005 .

[15]  U. Dholakia,et al.  When and Why the Background Contrast Effect Emerges: Thought Engenders Meaning by Influencing the Perception of Applicability , 2004 .

[16]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Spending Time versus Spending Money , 2004 .

[17]  R. Nozick.  On Austrian methodology , 1977, Synthese.

[18]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Preferences for sequences of outcomes. , 1993 .

[19]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Focusing Failures in Competitive Environments: Explaining Decision Errors in the Monty Hall Game, the Acquiring a Company Problem, and Multiparty Ultimatums , 2003 .

[20]  Joseph C. Nunes,et al.  Incommensurate Resources: Not Just More of the Same , 2003 .

[21]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[22]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .

[23]  Amar Cheema,et al.  The Effect of Credit on Spending Decisions: The Role of the Credit Limit and Credibility , 2002 .

[24]  C. Wöll,et al.  References for 2 , 2002 .

[25]  D. Prelec,et al.  Always Leave Home Without It: A Further Investigation of the Credit-Card Effect on Willingness to Pay , 2001 .

[26]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Focalism: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  P. Roberts,et al.  Eisenhower, Dwight D. , 2000 .

[28]  Rebecca K. Ratner,et al.  Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. , 1999 .

[29]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[30]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Book Reviews : Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improv ing Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998, 136 pages, $26.00 , 1998 .

[31]  Steven K. Jones,et al.  Choices and opportunities: another effect of framing on decisions , 1998 .

[32]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Does Living in California Make People Happy? A Focusing Illusion in Judgments of Life Satisfaction , 1998 .

[33]  Drazen Prelec,et al.  The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt , 1998 .

[34]  John W. Payne,et al.  Factors Affecting the Impact of Negatively and Positively Framed Ad Messages , 1997 .

[35]  R. Dhar.  Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option , 1997 .

[36]  Jack B. Soll,et al.  Mental Budgeting and Consumer Decisions , 1996 .

[37]  T. Gilovich,et al.  The experience of regret: what, when, and why. , 1995, Psychological review.

[38]  A. Tversky,et al.  Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. , 1994 .

[39]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Focussing in reasoning and decision making , 1993, Cognition.

[40]  E. Pasour.  Opportunity Cost, Sunk Cost, and Entrepreneurial Choice , 1985 .

[41]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[42]  Preferences Scientific.  Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. , 1982 .

[43]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[44]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[45]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[46]  Joshua Ronen,et al.  Opportunity Costs-An Experimental Approach , 1974 .

[47]  Paul Slovic,et al.  From Shakespeare to Simon: speculations--and some evidence-- about man's ability to process information , 1972 .

[48]  J. M. Buchanan,et al.  Cost and choice : an inquiry in economic theory , 1969 .

[49]  A. Inkeles,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. , 1968 .