The syntax-semantics interface in the Chinese ba-construction

The ba-construction is one of the few marked argument structure constructions in Chinese and represents a typical challenge for linguistic theory – being very frequent in language use, its contexts of use and its meaning are subject to rather clear intuitions of native speakers; on the other hand, the usage and semantics of the bǎ-construction cannot be described in terms of commonly assumed semantic categories and still less in terms of constructs assumed in formal theories. Thus, the researcher is forced to question existing concepts and to dedicate himself to the search of criteria, possible novel ones, that might explain facts which are so naturally perceived, understood and differentiated by language users. Besides, the bǎ-construction also illustrates some important characteristics of the Chinese language which turn into challenges for formal approaches. First, Chinese has a poor morphology and a rather unflexible constituent order; when thinking about argument structure, we might be tempted to think that the semantic part of argument structure can be “read” from surface constituent order. However, this is not the case – Chinese is rather versatile in argument distribution, and an NP that occupies a given syntactic slot can often be assigned a multitude of se- mantic roles. Second, the bǎ-construction also stands for the general pragmatic orientation of Chinese grammar, which shows off in its strong context dependence and the subjectification function. The present study takes the semantics of the construction as a starting point. 275 It aims at a precise formalization of semantic constraints which characterize the cases in which the bǎ-construction is licensed. Structural aspects are treated in a second step since the proposed semantic formalization also allows to resolve major issues that have been raised in structural studies of the bǎ-construction. The central facts about the construction that are targeted and explained are as follows: 1. The Chinese bǎ-construction allows for a range of different argument dis- tributions; in some cases, bǎ may select its own arguments. 2. The bǎ-construction places specific semantic constraints on its lexical pred- icate; thus, lexical verbs can be divided into three classes: (a) Verbs that occur in the bǎ-construction in “bare” form (b) Verbs that occur in the bǎ-construction with additional dependents that contribute to the satisfaction of the semantic constraint of bǎ (c) Verbs that do not occur in the bǎ-construction 3. The meaning of the bǎ-construction, when contrasted to the less marked SVO word order or to structures with reduplicated verbs, is perceived vaguely as “disposal”, “affectedness” or the “exertion of an influence”. The proposed analysis is based on scalar semantics, a line of semantic reason- ing introduced by Sapir (1944) and formalized and applied to different linguistic structures in a large body of recent literature (Hay et al., 1999; Wechsler, 2001; Gawron, 2005; Caudal and David, 2005; Beavers, 2006; Kennedy and Levin, 2008; Levin, 2010; Kennedy, 2012; Beavers, 2011a, 2012; Beavers and Zubair, 2011). The use of bǎ is semantically constrained in terms of scalarity and cau- sation. This semantic description is independent of the participant structure of a given instantiating predicate, which allows it to accommodate different argument distributions. Further, we note that bǎ is analyzed as a head and thus allows to 276 constrain central semantic properties of the clause and, specifically, of the lexi- cal predicate. The constraints are applied not to lexical verbs, but to the complex formed by the verb and its complements and modifiers. Thus, the verb is con- sidered together with its additional dependents, such as resultative or directional complements, manner modifiers etc., which can also contribute to the satisfaction of the constraint. The semantics is formalized into an HPSG analysis which also accounts for structural aspects of the construction. It is accompanied by analyses of additional verbal dependent structures which can contribute to the licensing of the bǎ-construction. Just as the semantic constraint, the structural analysis is in- dependent of the argument structure of a given lexical instantiation and derives the argument distribution in a given lexical instantiation from the interaction be- tween the argument structure of the lexical predicate, the causer requirement and the scalar constraint of bǎ.

[1]  S. Müller Head-driven phrase structure grammar : eine einführung , 2013 .

[2]  Feng-Hsi Liu,et al.  An Aspectual Analysis of BA , 1997 .

[3]  Graham Katz,et al.  Event arguments, adverb selection, and the Stative Adverb Gap ∗ , 2003 .

[4]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Argument Structure, Valence, and Binding , 1998, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[5]  Frank Richter,et al.  A Mathematical Formalism for Linguistic Theories with an Application in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar , 2000 .

[6]  Raymond Murphy Grammar in use , 1989 .

[7]  D. Flickinger Lexical rules in the hierarchical lexicon , 1989 .

[8]  Emmon Bach,et al.  The algebra of events , 1986, The Language of Time - A Reader.

[9]  Nicholas David Maclachlan Ostler,et al.  Case-linking : a theory of case and verb diathesis applied to classical Sanskrit. , 1979 .

[10]  Gerald Penn,et al.  Lexical Resource Semantics: From Theory to Implementation , 2004 .

[11]  Quian E Gao Argument Structure, HPSG, and Chinese Grammar , 2000 .

[12]  Bob Carpenter,et al.  The logic of typed feature structures , 1992 .

[13]  M. Cresswell THE SEMANTICS OF DEGREE , 1976 .

[14]  Jen Ting,et al.  A non-uniform analysis of the passive construction in mandarin Chinese , 1995 .

[15]  Adam Przepiórkowski,et al.  ARG-ST on Phrases: Evidence from Polish , 2001 .

[16]  John Beavers,et al.  Towards a semantic analysis of argument/oblique alternations in HPSG , 2005, Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.

[17]  J. Bresnan Lexical-Functional Syntax , 2000 .

[18]  A. Malchukov Case Pattern Splits, Verb Types and Construction Competition , 2005 .

[19]  Manfred Bierwisch,et al.  The Semantics of Gradation , 1989 .

[20]  R. Jackendoff Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon , 1975 .

[21]  L. Talmy Toward a Cognitive Semantics , 2003 .

[22]  趙 元任,et al.  A grammar of spoken Chinese = 中國話的文法 , 1968 .

[23]  C. Meier,et al.  The Meaning of Too, Enough, and So... That , 2003 .

[24]  R. Borsley Phrase-structure grammar and the Barriers conception of clause structure , 1989 .

[25]  Ferdinand de Saussure Grundfragen der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft , 1931 .

[26]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  The KEY to lexical semantic representations , 2006, Journal of Linguistics.

[27]  Ray Jackendoff Semantics and Cognition , 1983 .

[28]  Louise McNally,et al.  Degree vs. Manner Well: A Case Study in Selective Binding , 2013, Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory.

[29]  Stephen Wechsler,et al.  Lexical approaches to argument structure , 2014 .

[30]  Stefan Müller,et al.  Danish in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar , 2014 .

[31]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[32]  Jonas Kuhn Interfaces in Constraint-Based Theories of Grammar , 2007 .

[33]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[34]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  Semantically transparent linking in HPSG , 2003, Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.

[35]  R. Jackendoff The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in english , 1996 .

[36]  Y.-H. Audrey Li,et al.  The Syntax of Chinese , 2009 .

[37]  Noam Chomsky A minimalist program for linguistic theory , 1992 .

[38]  Beth Levin,et al.  Argument Realization , 2005 .

[39]  Yafei Li,et al.  The thematic hierarchy and causativity , 1995 .

[40]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event structure in perception and conception. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  Feng-hsi Liu,et al.  Word order variation and ba sentences in Chinese , 2007 .

[42]  C.-T. James Huang,et al.  The Syntax of Chinese: The ba construction , 2009 .

[43]  A. Goldberg,et al.  The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions , 2004 .

[44]  Mary Dalrymple,et al.  Lexical Functional Grammar , 2001 .

[45]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation , 1998 .

[46]  Martin Kay Functional Unification Grammar: a formalism for machine translation , 1984 .

[47]  Stefan Müller,et al.  HPSG - A Synopsis , 2014 .

[48]  Ole-Johan Dahl,et al.  On the definition of the telic-atelic (bounded-nonbounded) distinction , 1981 .

[49]  B. Levin Lexicalized Scales and Verbs of Scalar Change , 2010 .

[50]  M. Krifka The Origins of Telicity , 1998 .

[51]  T. Tsunoda Remarks on transitivity , 1985, Journal of Linguistics.

[52]  Oi-Kan Yue Hashimoto Mandarin Syntactic Structures , 1971 .

[53]  Beth Levin,et al.  Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements , 2008, Adjectives and Adverbs.

[54]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  Scalarity and state-changes in Mandarin (and other languages) , 2008 .

[55]  Walt Detmar Meurers,et al.  On Expressing Lexical Generalizations in HPSG , 2001, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[56]  Anthony Ruiz Davis,et al.  Lexical semantics and linking in the hierarchical lexicon , 1996 .

[57]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  The Composition of Incremental Change , 2010 .

[58]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Information-based syntax and semantics , 1987 .

[59]  C. Fillmore The case for case reopened , 1977 .

[60]  B. Levin,et al.  Scalar Structure Underlies Telicity in "Degree Achievements" , 1999 .

[61]  Nikolas Gisborne,et al.  The Event Structure of Perception Verbs , 2010 .

[62]  Stefan Müller,et al.  Zur Analyse der scheinbar mehrfachen Vorfeldbesetzung , 2005 .

[63]  John Beavers,et al.  Argument/oblique alternations and the structure of lexical meaning , 2006 .

[64]  John Beavers,et al.  Anticausatives in Sinhala: involitivity and causer suppression , 2012, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.

[65]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[66]  C. Huang Complex Predicates in Control , 1992 .

[67]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Remarks on Nominalization , 2020, Nominalization.

[68]  Zeno Vendler,et al.  Verbs and Times , 1957, The Language of Time - A Reader.

[69]  C.-T. James Huang,et al.  Resultatives and Unaccusatives: a Parametric View , 2006 .

[70]  David E. Johnson,et al.  Arc Pair Grammar , 1980 .

[71]  C. Tenny The aspectual interface hypothesis , 1989 .

[72]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics , 1989 .

[73]  Åshild Næss,et al.  What markedness marks: the markedness problem with direct objects , 2004 .

[74]  B. Iraide Ibarretxe-Antunano,et al.  Polysemy and metaphor in perception verbs : a cross-linguistic study , 2000 .

[75]  Dale Gerdemann,et al.  The Correct and Efficient Implementation of Appropriateness Specifications for Typed Feature Structures , 1994, COLING.

[76]  Gosse Bouma,et al.  Satisfying Constraints on Extraction andAdjunction , 2001 .

[77]  Östen Dahl,et al.  Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution : zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen , 1991 .

[78]  Carl Pollard The Nature of Constraint-Based Grammar , 1997 .

[79]  E. Sapir Grading, A Study in Semantics , 1944, Philosophy of Science.

[80]  Stefan Müller Complex Predicates: Verbal Complexes, Resultative Constructions, and Particle Verbs in German , 2002 .

[81]  Anthony R. Davis,et al.  Linking by Types in the Hierarchical Lexicon , 2001 .

[82]  Anne Abeillé,et al.  The syntactic flexibility of adverbs: French degree adverbs , 2003, Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.

[83]  Farrell Ackerman,et al.  Proto-Properties and Grammatical Encoding: A Correspondence Theory of Argument Selection , 2000 .

[84]  Walt Detmar Meurers,et al.  Head-driven phrase structure grammar: linguistic approach, formal foundations, and computational realization , 2006 .

[85]  R. Valin A synopsis of role and reference grammar , 1992 .

[86]  B. Rozwadowska Are thematic relations discrete , 1989 .

[87]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .

[88]  Beth Levin,et al.  Change of State Verbs: Implications for Theories of Argument Projection , 2002 .

[89]  D. Cruse Some thoughts on agentivity , 1973, Journal of Linguistics.

[90]  One-Soon Her,et al.  Argument-function mismatches in Mandarin resultatives : A lexical mapping account , 2007 .

[91]  Jeffrey Gruber Functions of the lexicon in formal descriptive grammars , 1967 .

[92]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[93]  David R. Dowty Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[94]  Anthony R. Davis,et al.  Linking as constraints on word classes in a hierarchical lexicon , 2000 .

[95]  Kate Kearns,et al.  Telic senses of deadjectival verbs , 2007 .

[96]  M. Halliday NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .

[97]  David R. Dowty On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘Thematic Role’ , 1989 .

[98]  A. Belletti,et al.  Psych-verbs and θ-theory , 1988 .

[99]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates , 2005 .

[100]  N. Cocchiarella,et al.  Situations and Attitudes. , 1986 .

[101]  Stefan Müller,et al.  Complement Extraction Lexical Rules and Argument Attraction , 1996, KONVENS.

[102]  T. Givón,et al.  Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction , 1982 .

[103]  Patrick Caudal,et al.  Types of degrees and types of event structures , 2005 .

[104]  Claudia Maienborn,et al.  On Davidsonian and Kimian States , 2008 .

[105]  M. Baker Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions , 1989 .

[106]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar , 1986, CSLI Lecture Notes.

[107]  A. Stechow COMPARING SEMANTIC THEORIES OF COMPARISON , 1984 .

[108]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[109]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  The (non-)universality of syntactic selection and functional application , 2012 .

[110]  One-Soon Her,et al.  Unifying the Long Passive and the Short Passive: On the Bei Construction in Taiwan Mandarin * , 2009 .

[111]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Aspectual and Causal Structure in Event Representations , 2008 .

[112]  Yen-hui Audrey Li,et al.  Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese , 1990 .

[113]  Robert D. Borsley,et al.  Subjects and complements in HPSG , 1987 .

[114]  T. Reinhart The theta system: syntactic realization of verbal concepts , 2000 .

[115]  Gang Liu Eine unifikations-basierte Grammatik für das moderne Chinesisch, dargestellt in der HPSG , 1997 .

[116]  Jeffrey Gruber Studies in lexical relations , 1965 .

[117]  C. Fillmore Some Problems for Case Grammar , 1971 .

[118]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[119]  Lisa deMena Travis,et al.  Parameters and effects of word order variation , 1984 .

[120]  R. Declerck,et al.  Spatial and temporal boundedness in English motion events , 2005 .

[121]  Ilse Depraetere,et al.  On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity , 1995 .

[122]  Yafei Li,et al.  Cross-Componential Causativity , 1999 .

[123]  John Beavers 2 2 Lexical aspect and multiple incremental themes , 2012 .

[124]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar , 1989 .

[125]  Hong Gao,et al.  Verbs of Contact by Impact in English and Their Equivalents in Mandarin Chinese , 2003 .

[126]  Noam Chomsky Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding , 1982 .

[127]  Dan Flickinger,et al.  Minimal Recursion Semantics: An Introduction , 2005 .

[128]  Tanya Reinhart,et al.  The Theta System – an overview , 2003 .

[129]  Stefan Müller,et al.  Zur Analyse der deutschen Satzstruktur , 2005 .

[130]  Å. Viberg The verbs of perception: a typological study , 1983 .

[131]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  Information structure and sentence form , 1994 .