Towards Privacy-preserving Incentive for Mobile Crowdsensing Under An Untrusted Platform

Reverse auction-based incentive mechanisms have been commonly proposed to stimulate mobile users to participate in crowdsensing, where users submit bids to the platform to compete for tasks. Recent works pointed out that bid is a private information which can reveal sensitive information of users (e.g., location privacy), and proposed bid-preserving mechanisms with differential privacy against inference attack. However, all these mechanisms rely on a trusted platform, and would fail in bid protection completely when the platform is untrusted (e.g., honest-but-curious). In this paper, we focus on the bid protection problem in mobile crowdsensing with an untrusted platform, and propose a novel privacy-preserving incentive mechanism to protect users’ true bids against the honest-but-curious platform while minimizing the social cost of winner selection. To this end, instead of uploading the true bid to the platform, a differentially private bid obfuscation function is designed with the exponential mechanism, which helps each user to obfuscate bids locally and submit obfuscated task-bid pairs to the platform. The winner selection problem with the obfuscated task-bid pairs is formulated as an integer linear programming problem and proved to be NP-hard. We consider the optimization problem at two different scenarios, and propose a solution based on Hungarian method for single measurement and a greedy solution for multiple measurements, respectively. The proposed incentive mechanism is proved to satisfy $\epsilon$-differential privacy, individual rationality and $\gamma$-truthfulness. The extensive experiments on a real-world data set demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed mechanism against the untrusted platform.

[1]  Klara Nahrstedt,et al.  Enabling PrivacyPreserving PrivacyPreserving PrivacyPreserving Incentives for Mobile Crowd Sensing Systems , 2016 .

[2]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Pay On-Demand: Dynamic Incentive and Task Selection for Location-Dependent Mobile Crowdsensing Systems , 2018, 2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS).

[3]  Kang G. Shin,et al.  Differentially private and strategy-proof spectrum auction with approximate revenue maximization , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[4]  Jia Xu,et al.  Incentive Mechanisms for Time Window Dependent Tasks in Mobile Crowdsensing , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Jing Wang,et al.  Quality-Aware and Fine-Grained Incentive Mechanisms for Mobile Crowdsensing , 2016, 2016 IEEE 36th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS).

[6]  Ed Dawson,et al.  Robust, Privacy Protecting and Publicly Verifiable Sealed-Bid Auction , 2002, ICICS.

[7]  H. Kuhn The Hungarian method for the assignment problem , 1955 .

[8]  Yu-Fang Chung,et al.  Bidder-anonymous English auction scheme with privacy and public verifiability , 2008, J. Syst. Softw..

[9]  Shaojie Tang,et al.  An Online Pricing Mechanism for Mobile Crowdsensing Data Markets , 2017, MobiHoc.

[10]  Markus Jakobsson,et al.  Mix and Match: Secure Function Evaluation via Ciphertexts , 2000, ASIACRYPT.

[11]  Randall P. Wolf,et al.  Protecting databases from inference attacks , 1997, Comput. Secur..

[12]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Mobile Crowd Sensing for Traffic Prediction in Internet of Vehicles , 2016, Sensors.

[13]  Jia Xu,et al.  Frameworks for Privacy-Preserving Mobile Crowdsensing Incentive Mechanisms , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[14]  Feng Xia,et al.  Heterogeneous incentive mechanism for time-sensitive and location-dependent crowdsensing networks with random arrivals , 2018, Comput. Networks.

[15]  Aaron Roth,et al.  Differentially private combinatorial optimization , 2009, SODA '10.

[16]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Differential Privacy , 2006, ICALP.

[17]  Xing Xie,et al.  TaskMe: Toward a dynamic and quality-enhanced incentive mechanism for mobile crowd sensing , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  Jun Luo,et al.  A Socially-Aware Incentive Mechanism for Mobile Crowdsensing Service Market , 2017, 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[19]  Ivana Podnar Žarko,et al.  Air and noise pollution monitoring in the city of Zagreb by using mobile crowdsensing , 2017, 2017 25th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM).

[20]  Hairong Qi,et al.  Privacy-Preserving Crowd-Sourced Statistical Data Publishing with An Untrusted Server , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[21]  Hairong Qi,et al.  Achieving location error tolerant barrier coverage for wireless sensor networks , 2017, Comput. Networks.

[22]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Mobile Crowdsensing Services for Tinnitus Assessment and Patient Feedback , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on AI & Mobile Services (AIMS).

[23]  Hairong Qi,et al.  Personalized Privacy-Preserving Task Allocation for Mobile Crowdsensing , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[24]  Chandreyee Chowdhury,et al.  Towards Smart City: Sensing Air Quality in City based on Opportunistic Crowd-sensing , 2017, ICDCN.

[25]  Yanchao Zhang,et al.  Privacy-Preserving Crowdsourced Spectrum Sensing , 2018, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[26]  Xi Fang,et al.  Crowdsourcing to smartphones: incentive mechanism design for mobile phone sensing , 2012, Mobicom '12.

[27]  Kazue Sako,et al.  An Auction Protocol Which Hides Bids of Losers , 2000, Public Key Cryptography.

[28]  Jiming Chen,et al.  An Exchange Market Approach to Mobile Crowdsensing: Pricing, Task Allocation, and Walrasian Equilibrium , 2017, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[29]  Guihai Chen,et al.  Differentially private spectrum auction with approximate revenue maximization , 2014, MobiHoc '14.

[30]  Paul F. Syverson,et al.  Hiding Routing Information , 1996, Information Hiding.