Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A frame-based approach

This research combines elements in pragmatics, sociolinguistics, and cognitive linguistics, using empirical data to contribute to our understanding of the processing of polite discourse. One hundred and five hours of spontaneous conversational data produced by native Cypriot Greek speakers of both sexes and of various ages and socio-economic backgrounds were recorded in various settings. The semi-phonological transcription of realisations of offers and requests yielded a corpus of 2,189 observations. Extra-linguistic variables considered during the analysis of these data included the interlocutors’ sex, age, and social class, the relationship between them, the setting of the exchange, and the order of occurrence of the speech act in the flow of the conversation. Linguistic variables included the presence/absence of a main-clause verb, its type (lexico-semantically defined), the subjective modality, and number+ person for which this was marked, as well as additional markers of politeness (address terms, diminutives, etc.). To test the validity of Brown and Levinson’s (1987) prediction that the degree of indirectness of an utterance realising an FTAx is commensurate with the sum of the Distance between interlocutors, the Power of the hearer over the speaker, and the Ranking of the imposition which FTAx entails in the culture in question, frequencies of co-occurrence between these variables were investigated. This investigation revealed an arbitrary association of particular combinations of linguistic features with particular combinations of extra-linguistic features. It is proposed that, to the extent that particular expressions are conventionalised for some use, and to the extent that such expressions constitute our main resource for achieving politeness, politeness is presumed given a minimal context. Such context is modelled as a frame combining information about extralinguistic features of the situation and the (socio-culturally defined) appropriate use of language therein. The presumptive nature of the implicatures arising when a frame of this kind is instantiated guarantees that politeness, defined as a perlocutionary effect consisting of the addressee holding the belief that the speaker is polite, is achieved all else being equal. A natural explanation is thus provided for the oft-repeated observation that politeness commonly passes unnoticed. This account departs from previous approaches, which view politeness as tied to speakers’ intentions and communicated by means of particularised implicatures. In the proposed schema, speakers’ intentions come into play only when the expression used is not conventionalised for some use relative to the (minimal) context of utterance. They then give rise to particularised implicatures which necessitate a reference to the nonce context of utterance.

[1]  E. Haugen Dialect, Language, Nation1 , 1966 .

[2]  O. G. Nwoye,et al.  Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face , 1992 .

[3]  Syntactic strategies and politeness phenomena , 1991 .

[4]  Shoshana Blum-Kulka,et al.  Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse , 1997 .

[5]  D. Hymes Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach , 1974 .

[6]  K. Bach DEFAULT REASONING: JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS AND KNOWING WHEN TO THINK TWICE , 1984 .

[7]  Laurence R. Horn From if to iff: Conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening , 2000 .

[8]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[9]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  PHONETIC PREREQUISITES FOR A DISTINCTIVE FEATURE THEORY , 1972 .

[10]  John R. Searle,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1970 .

[11]  Maria Sifianou Do We Need to Be Silent to Be Extremely Polite? Silence and FTAs. , 1995 .

[12]  Rosina Márquez-Reiter Linguistic politeness in Britain and Uruguay : a contrastive study of requests and apologies , 2000 .

[13]  J. Gumperz,et al.  Individual and Social Differences in Language Use , 1979 .

[14]  Brian Newton The Generative Interpretation of Dialect: A Study of Modern Greek Phonology , 1973 .

[15]  S. Blum-Kulka You don't touch lettuce with your fingers: , 1990 .

[16]  D. Long The Effects of Pragmatics and Discourse Style on Recognition Memory for Sentences. , 1994 .

[17]  Catherine Hanson,et al.  Development of Schemata during Event Parsing: Neisser's Perceptual Cycle as a Recurrent Connectionist Network , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[19]  Johan Vanparys Categories and Complements of Illocutionary Verbs in a Cognitive Perspective , 1996 .

[20]  Patricia L. Carrell,et al.  POLITENESS: COMPARING NATIVE AND NONNATIVE JUDGMENTS , 1981 .

[21]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts , 1987 .

[22]  B. Fraser,et al.  The association of deference with linguistic form , 1981 .

[23]  R. Ide 'Sorry for your kindness' : Japanese interactional ritual in public discourse , 1998 .

[24]  Arhonto Terzi Cypriot Greek Clitics and Their Positioning Restrictions , 1999 .

[25]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Accommodation, Meaning, and Implicature: Interdisciplinary Foundations for Pragmatics , 2003 .

[26]  Frank Burton,et al.  The politics of legitimacy : struggles in a Belfast community , 1979 .

[27]  P. Trudgill Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society , 1975 .

[28]  Contrasting German-Greek politeness and the consequences , 1994 .

[29]  A. Bell Language style as audience design , 1984, Language in Society.

[30]  Asa Kasher,et al.  Conversational Maxims and Rationality , 1976 .

[31]  D. Karoulla-Vrikkis The language of the Greek Cypriots Today : A Revelation of an Identity Crisis? , 1991 .

[32]  Peter Auer,et al.  Subjective and Objective Parameters Determining "Salience" in Long-Term Dialect Accommodation. , 1998 .

[33]  E. Goffman Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order , 1971 .

[34]  Richard Shillcock,et al.  Modularity and the processing of closed-class words , 1993 .

[35]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics , 1998 .

[36]  P. Brown Politeness strategies and the attribution of intentions: The case of Tzeltal irony , 1995 .

[37]  Robyn Carston,et al.  The semantics/pragmatics distinction: a view from Relevance Theory , 1998 .

[38]  S. Attardo Locutionary and perlocutionary cooperation : The perlocutionary cooperative principle , 1997 .

[39]  Y. Matsumoto Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese , 1988 .

[40]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event structure in perception and conception. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  H. Grice Utterer's meaning and intentions , 1969 .

[42]  Maria Sifianou,et al.  The use of diminutives in expressing politeness: Modern Greek versus English , 1992 .

[43]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures , 1978 .

[44]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Spoken word recognition: Research and theory. , 1994 .

[45]  M. V. E. Vidal Cortesía, fórmulas convencionales y estrategias indirectas , 1995 .

[46]  Thorstein Fretheim,et al.  The effect of intonation on a type of scalar implicature , 1992 .

[47]  theodossia-soula Pavlidou Cooperation and the choice of linguistic means: Some evidence from the use of the subjunctive in modern Greek , 1991 .

[48]  Takuo Hayashi,et al.  Politeness in conflict management: A conversation analysis of dispreferred message from a cognitive perspective , 1996 .

[49]  Politeness: a relevant issue for relevance theory , 1998 .

[50]  Sherri L. Condon,et al.  Discourse ok revisited: default organization in verbal interaction☆ , 2001 .

[51]  Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice , 1994 .

[52]  V. Žegarac What is “Phatic Communication”? , 1998 .

[53]  Victoria Escandell-Vidal,et al.  Towards a cognitive approach to politeness , 1996 .

[54]  Disagreement in Turkish troubles-talk , 1992 .

[55]  ‘We are going to go there’: Positive politeness in Ojibwa , 1989 .

[56]  W. Labov,et al.  Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy As Conversation , 1976 .

[57]  C. Fillmore FRAME SEMANTICS AND THE NATURE OF LANGUAGE * , 1976 .

[58]  T. G.,et al.  Logic in Practice , 1934, Nature.

[59]  F. Récanati The Pragmatics of What is Said , 1989 .

[60]  J. Atlas,et al.  It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: Radical pragmatics (revised standard version) , 1981 .

[61]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[62]  C. Lehmann,et al.  Grammaticalization: synchronic variation and diachronic change , 1985 .

[63]  K. Bach,et al.  Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts , 1983 .

[64]  Interlectal Awareness as a Reflex of Linguistic Dimensions of Power: Evidence from Greek , 1992 .

[65]  K. Werkhofer 6. Traditional and modern views: the social constitution and the power of politeness , 1992 .

[66]  H. Giles,et al.  Language: Contexts and Consequences , 1991 .

[67]  G. Held 5. Politeness in linguistic research , 1992 .

[68]  W. Turnbull,et al.  Conversational structure and facework in arguing , 1998 .

[69]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  The viewpoint complexity of an object-recognition task , 1998, Vision Research.

[70]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Communicative Intentions, Plan Recognition, and Pragmatics: Comments on Thomason and on Litman and Allen , 2003 .

[71]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  Language and Symbolic Power , 1991 .

[72]  D. Sperber,et al.  Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach , 1998 .

[73]  Georgia M. Green Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding , 1989 .

[74]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  A theory of scalar implicature , 1985 .

[75]  M. González Politeness: some universals in language usage , 1995 .

[76]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction , 1979 .

[77]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The role of culture‐specific schemata in the comprehension and recall of stories∗ , 1978 .

[78]  W. Labov Principles Of Linguistic Change , 1994 .

[79]  F. Coulmas On the sociolinguistic relevance of routine formulae , 1979 .

[80]  B. Clark,et al.  Experimental pragmatics and what is said: a response to Gibbs and Moise. , 1999, Cognition.

[81]  R. Watts,et al.  Relevance and relational work: linguistic politeness as politic behavior , 1989 .

[82]  C. Snow,et al.  Developmental perspectives on politeness , 1990 .

[83]  R. Lakoff,et al.  STYLISTIC STRATEGIES WITHIN A GRAMMAR OF STYLE , 1979 .

[84]  R. Lakoff The logic of politeness: or minding your p''s and q''s , 1973 .

[85]  P. Whitney,et al.  On babies, bath water, and schemata: A reconsideration of top‐down processes in comprehension , 1995 .

[86]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[87]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Rational interaction as the basis for communication , 2003 .

[88]  Gene H. Lerner Finding "Face" in the Preference Structures of Talk-in-Interaction , 1996 .

[89]  Lesley Milroy,et al.  Language and social networks , 1980 .

[90]  A. Bayraktaroglu Politeness and interactional imbalance , 1991 .

[91]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[92]  A. Chan,et al.  A breakdown of event schemas in patients with schizophrenia: an examination of their script for dining at restaurants , 1999, Psychiatry Research.

[93]  M. Tomasello Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 2003 .

[94]  K. Jaszczolt Discourse, Beliefs and Intentions: Semantic Defaults and Propositional Attitude Ascription , 1999 .

[95]  Wolfgang U. Dressler,et al.  Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German, and Other Languages , 1997 .

[96]  E. Goody Questions and politeness : strategies in social interaction , 1978 .

[97]  Florian Coulmas,et al.  Introduction: Conversational Routine , 1981 .

[98]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[99]  S. Blum-Kulka Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? , 1987 .

[100]  J. Sadock On Testing for Conversational Implicature , 1978 .

[101]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview , 1987 .

[102]  Arhonto Terzi Clitic Combinations, Their Hosts and Their Ordering , 1999 .

[103]  Alison Wray,et al.  The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model , 2000 .

[104]  D. Clarke,et al.  Semantic fields and frames: Historical explorations of the interface between language, action, and cognition , 2000 .

[105]  J. Greenberg A Quantitative Approach to the Morphological Typology of Language , 1960, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[106]  S. Garrod,et al.  Conversation, co-ordination and convention: an empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions , 1994, Cognition.

[107]  F. Hsu Rugged Individualism Reconsidered: Essays in Psychological Anthropology , 1983 .

[108]  Stephen E. Levinson,et al.  Generalized Conversational Implicatures and the Semantics/ Pragmatics Interface , 1988 .

[109]  M. Minsky The Society of Mind , 1986 .

[110]  H. Garfinkel Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities , 1964 .

[111]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Context effects in lexical processing: A connectionist approach to modularity. , 1987 .

[112]  Richard J. Watts,et al.  2. Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality , 1992 .

[113]  M. A. van Rees,et al.  The adequacy of speech act theory for explaining conversational phenomena: A response to some conversation analytical critics , 1992 .

[114]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[115]  A. Papapavlou Attitudes toward the Greek Cypriot dialect: sociocultural implications , 1998 .

[116]  S. P. D. Ayala FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting needs?—Politeness in question time , 2001 .

[117]  D. Tannen,et al.  Power and Solidarity in Modern Greek Conversation: Disagreeing to Agree , 2010 .

[118]  J. Pine,et al.  Subject–auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘what children do know?’ , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[119]  Mitchell S. Green,et al.  Quantity, volubility, and some varieties of discourse , 1995 .

[120]  Susann Claffey,et al.  Genre, frames and writing in research settings , 1998 .

[121]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Context effects in lexical processing , 1987, Cognition.

[122]  Keith Allan,et al.  Speech Act Theory: An Overview , 2001 .

[123]  Robyn Carston,et al.  Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature , 1998 .

[124]  Akiko Kawasaki,et al.  Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American english , 1986 .

[125]  John R. Edwards Social class differences and the identification of sex in children's speech , 1979 .

[126]  Thomas Holtgraves,et al.  Politeness as universal: Cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use. , 1990 .

[127]  Y. Matsumoto Politeness and conversational universals – observations from Japanese , 1989 .

[128]  C. Fillmore 5 – On Fluency , 1979 .

[129]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Towards More Creative Case-Based Design Systems , 1994, AAAI.

[130]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  Pragmatics in understanding what is said , 1997, Cognition.

[131]  D. Biber Strategies of discourse comprehension By Teun A. van Dijk and Walter Kintsch (review) , 2015 .

[132]  R. Arundale An Alternative Model And Ideology Of Communication For An Alternative To Politeness Theory , 1999 .

[133]  R. Harris TRUTHFULNESS, CONVERSATIONAL MAXIMS AND INTERACTION IN AN EGYPTIAN VILLAGE , 1996 .

[134]  Nick Chater,et al.  Neural networks: The new statistical models of mind , 1995 .

[135]  ALEX LASCARIDES,et al.  TEMPORAL COHERENCE AND DEFEASIBLE KNOWLEDGE , 1993 .

[136]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Minimization and conversational inference , 1987 .

[137]  Sister Mechtraud join,et al.  The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life , 1955 .

[138]  Michael L. Geis Speech acts and conversational interaction: Interactional effects , 1995 .

[139]  Penelope Brown,et al.  How and why are women more polite: Some evidence from a Mayan community , 1980 .

[140]  Marian Klamer,et al.  How report verbs become quote markers and complementisers , 2000 .

[141]  Ann Copestake,et al.  The semi-generative lexicon: limits on lexical productivity , 2001 .

[142]  Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni,et al.  A Multilevel Approach in the Study of Talk-In-Interaction , 1997 .

[143]  Anssi Peräkylä,et al.  Validity and reliability in research based tapes and transcripts , 1997 .

[144]  A. Woods,et al.  Statistics in Language Studies , 1986 .

[145]  P. Kerswill,et al.  Creating a New Town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes , 2000, Language in Society.

[146]  E. Schegloff Sequencing in Conversational Openings , 1968 .

[147]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[148]  B. Newton Cypriot Greek: Its Phonology and Inflections , 1972 .

[149]  S. Ide Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness , 1989 .

[150]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Technical Report No. 41. , 1977 .

[151]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  Formulaicity, frame semantics, and pragmatics in German binomial expressions , 1984 .

[152]  B. Fraser Perspectives on politeness , 1990 .

[153]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort: an Introduction to Human Ecology , 2012 .

[154]  S. Paris,et al.  The role of inference in children's comprehension and memory for sentences , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[155]  Janet Holmes,et al.  Paying compliments: A sex-preferential politeness strategy , 1988 .

[156]  Horst Arndt,et al.  POLITENESS REVISITED: CROSS-MODAL SUPPORTIVE STRATEGIES , 1985 .

[157]  C. A. Ferguson The structure and use of politeness formulas , 1976 .