The Weak Reality That Makes Quantum Phenomena More Natural: Novel Insights and Experiments

While quantum reality can be probed through measurements, the Two-State Vector Formalism (TSVF) reveals a subtler reality prevailing between measurements. Under special pre- and post-selections, odd physical values emerge. This unusual picture calls for a deeper study. Instead of the common, wave-based picture of quantum mechanics, we suggest a new, particle-based perspective: Each particle possesses a definite location throughout its evolution, while some of its physical variables (characterized by deterministic operators, some of which obey nonlocal equations of motion) are carried by “mirage particles” accounting for its unique behavior. Within the time interval between pre- and post-selection, the particle gives rise to a horde of such mirage particles, of which some can be negative. What appears to be “no-particle”, known to give rise to interaction-free measurement, is in fact a self-canceling pair of positive and negative mirage particles, which can be momentarily split and cancel out again. Feasible experiments can give empirical evidence for these fleeting phenomena. In this respect, the Heisenberg ontology is shown to be conceptually advantageous compared to the Schrödinger picture. We review several recent advances, discuss their foundational significance and point out possible directions for future research.

[1]  R. E. Kastner Demystifying Weak Measurements , 2017 .

[2]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  Complete description of a quantum system at a given time , 1991 .

[3]  A. Elitzur,et al.  Voices of Silence, Novelties of Noise: Oblivion and Hesitation as origins of quantum mysteries , 2015, 1504.06241.

[4]  S. Takeuchi,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a quantum shutter closing two slits simultaneously , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[5]  S. Popescu,et al.  The classical limit of quantum optics: not what it seems at first sight , 2013, 1305.0168.

[6]  Unusual Interactions of Pre-and-Post-Selected Particles , 2014 .

[7]  D. Struppa,et al.  Finally making sense of the double-slit experiment , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  L Vaidman,et al.  Asking photons where they have been. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[9]  Yutaka Shikano,et al.  Strange weak values , 2010, 1006.1615.

[10]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  Past of a quantum particle , 2013, 1304.7474.

[11]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  The Two-State Vector Formalism of Qauntum Mechanics: an Updated Review , 2001, quant-ph/0105101.

[12]  A. Elitzur,et al.  1−1=Counterfactual: on the potency and significance of quantum non-events , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  Shi-Yao Zhu,et al.  An Ideal Experiment to Determine the ‘Past of a Particle’ in the Nested Mach-Zehnder Interferometer , 2014, 1410.7482.

[14]  Yakir Aharonov,et al.  Quantum Paradoxes: Quantum Theory for the Perplexed , 2005 .

[15]  Are the Weak Measurements Really Measurements , 2013, 1305.4809.

[16]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  How one shutter can close N slits , 2002, quant-ph/0206074.

[17]  Lev Vaidman,et al.  Weak value beyond conditional expectation value of the pointer readings , 2016, 1611.03989.

[18]  R. Kastner,et al.  Quantum to classical transitions via weak measurements and post-selection , 2016 .

[19]  Yink Loong Len,et al.  Past of a quantum particle revisited , 2017 .

[20]  Eliahu Cohen,et al.  Introduction to Weak Measurements and Weak Values , 2013 .

[21]  A. Matzkin Weak Values and Quantum Properties , 2018, Foundations of Physics.

[22]  Eliahu Cohen,et al.  The Two-Time Interpretation and Macroscopic Time-Reversibility , 2017, Entropy.

[23]  Eliahu Cohen,et al.  Extraordinary interactions between light and matter determined by anomalous weak values , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[24]  A. Matzkin,et al.  Observation of a quantum Cheshire Cat in a matter-wave interferometer experiment , 2013, Nature Communications.

[25]  L. Vaidman,et al.  Quantum mechanical interaction-free measurements , 1993, hep-th/9305002.

[26]  A. Matzkin,et al.  Null weak values and the past of a quantum particle , 2016, 1611.02780.

[27]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  The Case of the Disappearing (and Re-Appearing) Particle , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Nonlocal Position Changes of a Photon Revealed by Quantum Routers , 2017, Scientific reports.

[29]  M. Berry,et al.  Typical weak and superweak values , 2010 .

[30]  B. Svensson What Is a Quantum-Mechanical “Weak Value” the Value of? , 2013, 1301.4328.

[31]  Quantum Oblivion: A Master Key for Many Quantum Riddles , 2014, 1411.2278.

[32]  S. Popescu,et al.  Quantum Cheshire Cats , 2012, 1202.0631.

[33]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  A nonlocal ontology underlying the time-symmetric Heisenberg representation , 2015, 1510.03084.

[34]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  An Improved Experiment to Determine the ‘Past of a Particle’ in the Nested Mach–Zehnder Interferometer , 2015, 1701.04109.

[35]  A. Jordan,et al.  Colloquium : Understanding quantum weak values: Basics and applications , 2013, 1305.7154.

[36]  Beyond Wavefunctions: A Time-Symmetric Nonlocal Ontology for Quantum Mechanics , 2017 .

[37]  Nonclassicality in weak measurements , 2004, quant-ph/0408038.

[38]  J. Lebowitz,et al.  TIME SYMMETRY IN THE QUANTUM PROCESS OF MEASUREMENT , 1964 .

[39]  R. Jozsa Complex weak values in quantum measurement , 2007, 0706.4207.

[40]  Vaidman,et al.  How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[41]  Eliahu Cohen,et al.  What Weak Measurements and Weak Values Really Mean: Reply to Kastner , 2017, Foundations of physics.

[42]  L. Vaidman,et al.  Comment on “Past of a quantum particle revisited” , 2018, Physical Review A.