Dynamic bridge-vehicle interactions

The interaction between vehicles and bridges remains a complex yet important concept in the assessment of dynamic loading on existing structures. The dynamic impact of vehicular loading on a structure is typically accounted for in the assessment procedure by the application of a dynamic load allowance (DLA) factor to the assessment load, with a factor of 0.4 specified in the Australian bridge design code AS 5100. This factor is historically based on empirical dynamic load test data that underpins the Canadian bridge design codes. The Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) has adopted the AS 5100 DLA factor in its base level, Tier 1 Bridge Heavy Load Assessment Brief (2013). However it is looking to develop a better understanding of a family of bridges for higher-order bridge assessments when adopting dynamic load factors, taking into account various vehicle and structure types and dynamic influences. This in turn may lead to a review of vehicle access and ensure efficient use of resources. To address these issues and to improve understanding on bridge-vehicle interactions, TMR has initiated a three-year research program in conjunction with ARRB Group. This paper presents the findings from the first year of the program. In summary, a detailed literature review has yielded valuable information pertaining to various factors influencing the assessment of bridge-vehicle dynamic interactions and the background to the adoption of the current DLA factors. A gap analysis has shown that very little practical information has been published regarding the dynamic impact of hydro-pneumatic cranes and road trains on bridges. A significant review of previous load test reports from national and international jurisdictions revealed that various structure types, vehicle types, and materials can influence the dynamic response of a structure to dynamic loads. Frequency matching between vehicles and structures can also result in significant load amplification. A recent load test on Canal Creek Bridge in Cloncurry, Queensland, using various vehicle types and suspensions supports these observations. Finally, a review of the viability and applicability of the development of a Vehicle-Bridge Interaction model for TMR use has been conducted. Additional field tests are scheduled as part of the program, with validation and calibration of models and experimental findings and recommendations to be completed in the final year.

[1]  R W Pritchard.  Service traffic loads on Six Mile Creek Bridge , 1980 .

[2]  David J. Cole,et al.  Effects of Vehicle Suspension Design on Dynamics of Highway Bridges , 1995 .

[3]  Omar Chaallal,et al.  Bridge dynamics and dynamic amplification factors — a review of analytical and experimental findings , 1992 .

[4]  J. R. Billing,et al.  Dynamic loading and testing of bridges in Ontario , 1984 .

[5]  Colin O'Connor,et al.  Impact studies on small composite girder bridge , 1985 .

[6]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Bridge–Vehicle Interaction in Curved Box Girder Bridges , 1997 .

[7]  R Heywood.  HYDRO-PNEUMATIC CRANE AND TRACTOR SEMI-TRAILERS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THEIR DYNAMIC EFFECTS ON A SHORT-SPAN BRIDGE , 1998 .

[8]  R Cantieni,et al.  Dynamic behavior of highway bridges under the passage of heavy vehicles , 1992 .

[9]  Hassan Moghimi,et al.  Impact factors for a composite steel bridge using non-linear dynamic simulation , 2008 .

[10]  Marian Ralbovsky,et al.  Assessment and Rehabilitation of Central European Highway Structures , 2009 .

[11]  J R Billing,et al.  DESIGN PROVISIONS FOR DYNAMIC LOADING OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES , 1984 .

[12]  Hani Nassif,et al.  Model Validation for Bridge-Road-Vehicle Dynamic Interaction System , 2003 .

[13]  Yeong-Bin Yang,et al.  Vehicle–bridge interaction dynamics and potential applications , 2005 .

[14]  Arturo González,et al.  Vehicle-bridge dynamic interaction using finite element modelling , 2010 .

[15]  Jerry Wekezer,et al.  Investigation of Impact Factors for Permit Vehicles , 2008 .

[16]  Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.  SIMULATION OF DYNAMIC LOAD FOR BRIDGES , 1991 .

[17]  Eugene J. O'Brien,et al.  Influence of pre-existing vibrations on the dynamic response of medium span bridges , 2009 .

[18]  Reto Cantieni,et al.  DYNAMIC LOAD TESTING OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES , 1984 .

[19]  Jerry Wekezer,et al.  DYNAMIC LOAD ALLOWANCE FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGES , 2011 .

[20]  Jerry Wekezer,et al.  Experimental Assessment of Dynamic Responses Induced in Concrete Bridges by Permit Vehicles , 2011 .

[21]  Colin Christopher Caprani,et al.  Determination of bridge lifetime dynamic amplification factor using finite element analysis of critical loading scenarios , 2008 .

[22]  L Fryba,et al.  VIBRATION OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES UNDER MOVING LOADS (3RD EDITION) , 1999 .

[23]  Geoff Boully,et al.  Dynamic interaction of vehicles and bridges , 2002 .

[24]  Jason Dowling,et al.  Characteristic dynamic traffic load effects in bridges , 2009 .

[25]  B Bakht,et al.  DYNAMIC TESTING OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES--A REVIEW , 1989 .

[26]  Geoff Boully,et al.  Dynamic Loading of Bridges , 2001 .

[27]  R Cantieni,et al.  Dynamic load tests on highway bridges in switzerland - 60 years experience of EMPA , 1983 .

[28]  Olivier Burdet,et al.  Dynamic load testing of Swiss bridges , 1995 .

[29]  J R Billing.  DYNAMIC TEST OF BRIDGES IN ONTARIO, 1980: DATA CAPTURE, TEST PROCEDURES, AND DATA PROCESSING , 1982 .

[30]  Hassan Moghimi,et al.  Development of a numerical model for bridge-vehicle interaction and human response to traffic-induced vibration , 2008 .

[31]  J R Billing,et al.  THE ART AND SCIENCE OF DYNAMIC TESTING OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES , 1990 .

[32]  Arturo González,et al.  Bridge Dynamics and Loading , 2006 .

[33]  Arturo González,et al.  Bridge roughness index as an indicator of bridge dynamic amplification , 2006 .

[34]  Demeke B. Ashebo,et al.  Evaluation of dynamic loads on a skew box girder continuous bridge - Part II: Parametric study and dynamic load factor , 2007 .