Influence of porosity, pore size, and cortical thickness on the propagation of ultrasonic waves guided through the femoral neck cortex: a simulation study

The femoral neck is a common fracture site in elderly people. The cortical shell is thought to be the major contributor to the mechanical competence of the femoral neck, but its microstructural parameters are not sufficiently accessible under in vivo conditions with current X-ray-based methods. To systematically investigate the influences of pore size, porosity, and thickness of the femoral neck cortex on the propagation of ultrasound, we developed 96 different bone models (combining 6 different pore sizes with 4 different porosities and 4 different thicknesses) and simulated the ultrasound propagation using a finite-difference time-domain algorithm. The simulated singleelement emitter and receiver array consisting of 16 elements (8 inferior and 8 superior) were placed at anterior and posterior sides of the bone, respectively (transverse transmission). From each simulation, we analyzed the waveform collected by each of the inferior receiver elements for the one with the shortest time of flight. The first arriving signal of this waveform, which is associated with the wave traveling through the cortical shell, was then evaluated for its three different waveform characteristics (TOF: time point of the first point of inflection of the received signal, Δt: difference between the time point at which the signal first crosses the zero baseline and TOF, and A: amplitude of the first extreme of the first arriving signal). From the analyses of these waveform characteristics, we were able to develop multivariate models to predict pore size, porosity, and cortical thickness, corresponding to the 96 different bone models, with remaining errors in the range of 50 μm for pore size, 1.5% for porosity, and 0.17 mm for cortical thickness.

[1]  D. Rohrbach,et al.  Longitudinal elastic properties and porosity of cortical bone tissue vary with age in human proximal femur. , 2013, Bone.

[2]  Gangming Luo,et al.  Clinical assessment of the 1/3 radius using a new desktop ultrasonic bone densitometer. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound of cortical bone in the femoral neck predicts femur strength: Results of a pilot study , 2013, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  Spatial distribution of tissue level properties in a human femoral cortical bone. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  P. Tang,et al.  Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Injury.

[6]  P. Laugier,et al.  Relative contributions of porosity and mineralized matrix properties to the bulk axial ultrasonic wave velocity in human cortical bone. , 2012, Ultrasonics.

[7]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  Change in porosity is the major determinant of the variation of cortical bone elasticity at the millimeter scale in aged women. , 2011, Bone.

[8]  Andrew H. Gee,et al.  High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  F. Padilla,et al.  Femur ultrasound (FemUS)—first clinical results on hip fracture discrimination and estimation of femoral BMD , 2010, Osteoporosis International.

[10]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Intracortical remodelling and porosity in the distal radius and post-mortem femurs of women: a cross-sectional study , 2010, The Lancet.

[11]  Pascal Laugier,et al.  Potential of first arriving signal to assess cortical bone geometry at the Hip with QUS: a model based study. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  C. Graeff,et al.  Quantitative computed tomographic assessment of the effects of 24 months of teriparatide treatment on 3D femoral neck bone distribution, geometry, and bone strength: Results from the EUROFORS study , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  Steven K Boyd,et al.  Postmenopausal women with osteopenia have higher cortical porosity and thinner cortices at the distal radius and tibia than women with normal aBMD: An in vivo HR‐pQCT study , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  E. Bossy,et al.  In vivo performance evaluation of bi-directional ultrasonic axial transmission for cortical bone assessment. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  C. Cooper,et al.  Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[16]  G. Holzer,et al.  Hip Fractures and the Contribution of Cortical Versus Trabecular Bone to Femoral Neck Strength , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  R. Siffert,et al.  Ultrasonic assessment of the radius in vitro. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  Ego Seeman,et al.  Bone remodelling: its local regulation and the emergence of bone fragility. , 2008, Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism.

[19]  Martin Heller,et al.  In vivo measurements of ultrasound transmission through the human proximal femur. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  Gangming Luo,et al.  Ultrasound simulation in bone , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  P. Moilanen,et al.  Ultrasonic guided waves in bone , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  K. Raum,et al.  Assessment of Anisotropic Tissue Elasticity of Cortical Bone from High-Resolution, Angular Acoustic Measurements , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[23]  Robin O Cleveland,et al.  Derivation of elastic stiffness from site-matched mineral density and acoustic impedance maps , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Françoise Peyrin,et al.  Bone microstructure and elastic tissue properties are reflected in QUS axial transmission measurements. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  X Edward Guo,et al.  The dependence of transversely isotropic elasticity of human femoral cortical bone on porosity. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  S. Bensamoun,et al.  Transmission scanning acoustic imaging of human cortical bone and relation with the microstructure. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[27]  Martin Heller,et al.  Assessing Bone Status Beyond BMD: Evaluation of Bone Geometry and Porosity by Quantitative Ultrasound of Human Finger Phalanges , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[28]  Sabine Bensamoun,et al.  Spatial distribution of acoustic and elastic properties of human femoral cortical bone. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Tommi Kärkkäinen,et al.  Guided ultrasonic waves in long bones: modelling, experiment and in vivo application. , 2002, Physiological measurement.

[30]  S. Ullrich,et al.  Assessment of phalangeal bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by quantitative ultrasound , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[31]  N Loveridge,et al.  Structure of the Femoral Neck in Hip Fracture: Cortical Bone Loss in the Inferoanterior to Superoposterior Axis , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[32]  G. Breart,et al.  Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study , 1996, The Lancet.

[33]  Fernand Meyer,et al.  Topographic distance and watershed lines , 1994, Signal Process..

[34]  John Sall,et al.  Leverage Plots for General Linear Hypotheses , 1990 .

[35]  Emmanuel Bossy,et al.  Numerical Methods for Ultrasonic Bone Characterization , 2011 .

[36]  E. Seeman The periosteum—a surface for all seasons , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[37]  P. Laugier,et al.  A method for the estimation of femoral bone mineral density from variables of ultrasound transmission through the human femur. , 2007, Bone.

[38]  Kay Raum,et al.  Assessment of composition and anisotropic elastic properties of secondary osteon lamellae. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  B. Stampa,et al.  Assessment of the Geometry of Human Finger Phalanges Using Quantitative Ultrasound In Vivo , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[40]  N Loveridge,et al.  Regional differences in cortical porosity in the fractured femoral neck. , 1999, Bone.