Analysis of Thin Film Coatings on Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) by Confocal Raman Microscopy and Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering

The characterization of thin coatings on polymers such as poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is required in order to study chemical composition and coating continuity. Two different methods of applying Raman spectroscopy for this purpose are compared in this paper. Using confocal Raman microscopy, thick coatings (>10 μm) are relatively easily identified; however, the Raman scattering from the acrylic coatings commonly used is much weaker than that of PET and consequently, there is a background due to the substrate. Thin acrylic coatings (<1 μm) usually cannot be detected. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) of uncoated PET gives intense signals and if the spectra are taken from the metal-coated side, there is no evidence of the underlying Raman scattering from the bulk. Acrylic coatings do not give sufficiently strong or reproducible SERS to be reliably identified, but even thin (20 nm) coatings completely block the SERS from the substrate. Only where gaps appear in the coating is the SERS of the underlying PET seen. To detect a positive signal from the coating, SERS active labels were incorporated into the acrylic at low concentrations either as a physical mixture or as reactive co-monomers. This uniquely labels the coating and allows detection and, in principle, mapping of the coverage. Thus, for thick (≥1 μm) coatings, normal Raman spectroscopy is an effective technique for detecting the presence of the surface coating. However, it is ineffective with thin (<1 μm) coatings, and SERS alone only indicates where the coating is incomplete or defective. However, when a SERS label is added, spectra can be detected from very thin coatings (20 nm). The concentration of the labels is sufficiently low for the coating to remain colorless.

[1]  H. Reynaers,et al.  Morphology and melting behavior of semicrystalline poly(ethylene terephthalate). I. Isothermally crystallized PET , 1980 .

[2]  J. C. Jones,et al.  Synthesis of novel monoazo benzotriazole dyes specifically for surface enhanced resonance Raman scattering , 1998 .

[3]  C. Mijangos,et al.  Depth profiling of modified PVC surfaces using confocal Raman microspectroscopy , 2000 .

[4]  C. Mijangos,et al.  Confocal Raman Depth Profiling of Surface-Modified Polymer Films: Effects of Sample Refractive Index , 2001 .

[5]  Robert J. Meier,et al.  Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy: Theory and Application to Thin Polymer Samples , 1992 .

[6]  A. Wokaun,et al.  Surface Analysis of Excimer-Laser-Treated Polyethylene-Terephthalate by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy , 1993 .

[7]  C. Sammon,et al.  Materials analysis using confocal Raman microscopy , 1999 .

[8]  A. Campion,et al.  Surface-enhanced Raman scattering , 1998 .

[9]  Jack Yarwood,et al.  Depth Profiling of Poly(Methyl Methacrylate), Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Laminates by Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy , 1996 .

[10]  Neil J. Everall,et al.  Confocal Raman Microscopy: Why the Depth Resolution and Spatial Accuracy Can Be Much Worse Than You Think , 2000 .

[11]  R. Dasari,et al.  Ultrasensitive chemical analysis by Raman spectroscopy. , 1999, Chemical reviews.

[12]  G. D. Pitt,et al.  Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy Using a Stigmatic Spectrograph and CCD Detector , 1994 .

[13]  Kathy L. Rowlen,et al.  Influence of vapor deposition parameters on SERS active Ag film morphology and optical properties , 1994 .

[14]  N. Everall Modeling and Measuring the Effect of Refraction on the Depth Resolution of Confocal Raman Microscopy , 2000 .