To BlikBook or not to BlikBook: Exploring student engagement of an online discussion platform

ABSTRACT This paper reports on the use of BlikBook, a course engagement platform for tutors and students that facilitates academic engagement in higher education. Based on a case study where BlikBook was essential to the design and delivery of a large undergraduate module, the paper discusses how the platform opens new avenues for student feedback, and encourages more independence in peer-led student groups. The paper makes several important contributions to knowledge and practice. Firstly, it outlines the process of introducing new software within a university context, and identifies potential pitfalls. Secondly, it offers an assessment of BlikBook that was previously untried in the case study organisation. Thirdly, previous studies have focused primarily on students’ perceptions of online platforms, rather than on the differences in experiences between students and tutors, whereas the present study explores both aspects. Findings suggest that incorporating BlikBook in teaching could improve student engagement. Abbreviation: (HE) - Higher Education

[1]  N. Webb.  The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. , 2009, The British journal of educational psychology.

[2]  Vincenzo Morabito.  Big Data and Analytics: Strategic and Organizational Impacts , 2015 .

[3]  Suzanne Croy.  Development of a group work assessment pedagogy using constructive alignment theory. , 2018, Nurse education today.

[4]  John D'Ambra,et al.  Enhancing non-task sociability of asynchronous CSCL environments , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[5]  J. Hilsdon.  Peer learning for change in higher education , 2014 .

[6]  Siah Hwee Ang,et al.  Research Design for Business & Management , 2014 .

[7]  Shaun R. Harper,et al.  Making Engagement Equitable for Students in U.S. Higher Education Shaun R. Harper and Stephen John Quaye , 2014 .

[8]  A. Hattingh,et al.  Perceptions of teacher roles in an experience‐rich teacher education programme , 2008 .

[9]  Peter Ferguson,et al.  Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education , 2011 .

[10]  A. A. G. Putra,et al.  PIECING TOGETHER THE STUDENT SUCCESS PUZZLE: RESEARCH, PROPOSITIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS , 2013 .

[11]  J. Biggs.  Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment , 1996 .

[12]  E. Kassens-Noor.  Twitter as a teaching practice to enhance active and informal learning in higher education: The case of sustainable tweets , 2012 .

[13]  Chronicles From the Classroom: Making Sense of the Methodology and Methods of Narrative Analysis , 2005 .

[14]  George D. Kuh.  Assessing What Really Matters to Student Learning Inside The National Survey of Student Engagement , 2001 .

[15]  George D. Kuh.  What We're Learning About Student Engagement From NSSE: Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practices , 2003 .

[16]  E. Kahu.  Framing student engagement in higher education , 2013 .

[17]  Mellita M. Jones,et al.  Learning in the practicum: engaging pre-service teachers in reflective practice in the online space , 2014 .

[18]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[19]  Mei Liu,et al.  Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[20]  Bartholomäus Wissmath,et al.  Efficient learning using a virtual learning environment in a university class , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Linda Marie Fritschner.  Inside the Undergraduate College Classroom , 2000 .

[22]  E. Pascarella.  Identifying Excellence in Undergraduate Education Are We Even Close? , 2001 .

[23]  Marcia D. Dixson.  Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? , 2010 .

[24]  Tanya J. McGill,et al.  How students and instructors using a virtual learning environment perceive the fit between technology and task , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[25]  Joanne Deppeler.  Classroom assessment for student learning , 2006 .

[26]  M. Moore.  Editorial: Three types of interaction , 1989 .

[27]  David R. Thomas,et al.  A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data , 2006 .

[28]  B. Glaser.  Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence Vs. Forcing , 1992 .

[29]  Liping Deng,et al.  From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students' motivation and experiences in online communities , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Michael McCann,et al.  Constructive alignment in economics teaching: a reflection on effective implementation , 2017 .

[31]  Kuo-En Chang,et al.  Exploring the learner’s knowledge construction and cognitive patterns of different asynchronous platforms: comparison of an online discussion forum and Facebook , 2015 .

[32]  B. Hale,et al.  Evaluation of How the Blended Use of a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) Can Impact on Learning and Teaching in a Specific Module , 2014 .

[33]  L. Spencer,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research , 2002 .

[34]  Mike Moore,et al.  Editorial: Report from the international council , 1989 .

[35]  D. Mahboub,et al.  Students understanding and participation using ULearn: dynamics case , 2006 .

[36]  Erica C. Boling,et al.  Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences , 2012, Internet High. Educ..