Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: A choice experiment approach for inland river basin management.

The concept of ecosystem services provides a valuable approach for linking humans and nature and for supporting the protection of natural ecosystems. River water services, which influence public health and daily routines, have both social and ecological benefits to a surrounding area. However, river networks and their services have suffered extensive destruction due to urbanization and industrialization, especially in China. An assessment of river system benefits and recognition of public preferences are crucial for sustainable river management and effective river system restoration. The objective of this study was to assess a household's willingness to pay using a choice experiment (CE) with mixed logit and multinomial logit models. This technique was applied to evaluate a respondent's preferences regarding water service attributes such as upper basin, middle basin and lower basin ecological water distribution; water quality; and payment and the possible source of heterogeneity in these attributes. The estimated likelihood ratio test demonstrated that random parameter logit model (RPL) models had considerably more explanatory power than multinomial logit (MNL) models. It was also revealed that the RPL-II model was the most powerful among all the models, demonstrating the capability of that model to predict the choices of the respondents. Furthermore, the findings show that water quality was the most preferred river attribute, and households were willing to pay more for the water quality attribute that derives the highest marginal value. Household income level, residential location, education level, and sex were the main factors influencing willingness to pay. These assessments provide guidance, policy recommendations and a reference for researchers and policy makers to improve and enhance current river water services in the future.

[1]  Y. Che,et al.  Assessing Local Communities’ Willingness to Pay for River Network Protection: A Contingent Valuation Study of Shanghai, China , 2012, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[2]  Casey Brown,et al.  Ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities for hydrologic modeling to support decision making , 2014 .

[3]  Imran Khan,et al.  The inhabitants’ dual interest preferences and their impact on pro-environmental behavior in China , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[4]  Sandra Ramos,et al.  Applicability of ecological assessment tools for management decision-making: A case study from the Lima estuary (NW Portugal) , 2013 .

[5]  L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[6]  Li Baoguo,et al.  Agricultural causes of desertification risk in Minqin, China. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  J. Morris,et al.  Synergies and trade-offs in the management of lowland rural floodplains: an ecosystem services approach , 2011 .

[8]  Edward Maltby,et al.  Ecosystem services of wetlands: pathfinder for a new paradigm , 2011 .

[9]  Zhenliang Liao,et al.  River environmental decision support system development for Suzhou Creek in Shanghai. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  William R. Jordan The Sunflower Forest: Ecological Restoration and the New Communion with Nature , 2003 .

[11]  R Brouwer,et al.  Benefit transfer and spatial heterogeneity of preferences for water quality improvements. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Xu Qi-xin Stream structure characteristics and their impact on storageand flood control capacity in the urbanized plain river network , 2005 .

[13]  Minjuan Zhao,et al.  Exploring the spatial heterogeneity of individual preferences for integrated river basin management: an example of Heihe river basin , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[14]  Thomas Laitila,et al.  Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual , 2004 .

[15]  A. Khan,et al.  Impact assessment of land use change on surface temperature and agricultural productivity in Peshawar-Pakistan , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[16]  Kathrin Knüppe,et al.  The governance of ecosystem services in river basins: An approach for structured data representation and analysis , 2016 .

[17]  Kari L Vigerstol,et al.  A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  C. Bullock,et al.  Preferences and values for afforestation: The effects of location and respondent understanding on forest attributes in a labelled choice experiment , 2012 .

[19]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP , 2006 .

[20]  Jeffrey Bennett,et al.  Environmental values and resource management options: a choice modelling experience in Malaysia , 2004, Environment and Development Economics.

[21]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[22]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[23]  G. Dalrymple,et al.  $7.8 Billion for Everglades Restoration: Why Do Environmentalists Look So Worried? , 2003 .

[24]  G. Mill,et al.  Preferences for multiple use forest management in Ireland: Citizen and consumer perpectives , 2007 .

[25]  N. Hanley,et al.  Choice modeling at the "market stall": Individual versus collective interest in environmental valuation , 2007 .

[26]  David F. Layton,et al.  Heterogeneous Preferences Regarding Global Climate Change , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[27]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[28]  E. Barbier,et al.  Economic valuation of wetlands: A guide for policy makers and planners , 1997 .

[29]  D. Hensher,et al.  Preferences for tap water attributes within couples: An exploration of alternative mixed logit parameterizations , 2012 .

[30]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  The potential role of stated preference methods in the Water Framework Directive to assess disproportionate costs , 2008 .

[31]  J. Kushman Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses: Comment , 1987 .

[32]  Minjuan Zhao,et al.  Public Attitudes, Preferences and Willingness to Pay for River Ecosystem Services , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[33]  Maes Joachim,et al.  Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services , 2013 .

[34]  Wang Xuefeng,et al.  A Harmonious Water Rights Allocation Model for Shiyang River Basin, Gansu Province, China , 2009 .

[35]  M. Feldman,et al.  Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Seth D Guikema,et al.  An estimation of the social costs of landfill siting using a choice experiment. , 2005, Waste management.

[37]  C. Ryan,et al.  Stream Restoration and Enhancement Projects: Is Anyone Monitoring? , 2002, Environmental management.

[38]  R. Moss,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment , 2003 .

[39]  Bas Pedroli,et al.  Setting targets in strategies for river restoration , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[40]  J. Mcneely,et al.  The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity , 2010 .

[41]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[42]  Torgeir Ericson,et al.  The recreational value of different winter conditions in Oslo forests: a choice experiment. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[43]  Robert E. Wright,et al.  Price vector effects in choice experiments: an empirical test , 2005 .

[44]  James R. Follain,et al.  Estimating the demand for housing characteristics: A survey and critique , 1985 .

[45]  K. Lancaster,et al.  A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[46]  Marta Berbés-Blázquez A Participatory Assessment of Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing in Rural Costa Rica Using Photo-Voice , 2012, Environmental Management.

[47]  Edel Doherty,et al.  Valuing ecosystem services across water bodies: Results from a discrete choice experiment , 2014 .

[48]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Managing for Interactions between Local and Global Stressors of Ecosystems , 2013, PloS one.

[49]  J. Karr Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[50]  M. Willig,et al.  Underuse of social-ecological systems: A research agenda for addressing challenges to biocultural diversity , 2018 .

[51]  P. Pingali,et al.  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being , 2005 .

[52]  Minjuan Zhao,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity of preferences for improvements in river basin ecosystem services and its validity for benefit transfer , 2018, Ecological Indicators.

[53]  C. Manski The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[54]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[55]  Karen L. McLeod,et al.  Managing for cumulative impacts in ecosystem-based management through ocean zoning , 2008 .

[56]  Kai Yang,et al.  Assessing a riverfront rehabilitation project using the comprehensive index of public accessibility , 2012 .

[57]  Phoebe Koundouri,et al.  Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[58]  Á. Borja,et al.  Quantified biotic and abiotic responses to multiple stress in freshwater, marine and ground waters. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[59]  Sharon Woolsey,et al.  A strategy to assess river restoration success , 2007 .

[60]  Brendan Fisher,et al.  Valuing Ecosystem Services: The Case of Multi-functional Wetlands , 2008 .

[61]  Kathryn A Phillips,et al.  Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing. , 2002, Health services research.

[62]  J. Bennett,et al.  The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation , 2001 .

[63]  Minjuan Zhao,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services: a distance decay approach to quantify willingness to pay for improvements in Heihe River Basin ecosystems , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[64]  Y. Che,et al.  Residential Preferences for River Network Improvement: An Exploration of Choice Experiments in Zhujiajiao, Shanghai, China , 2014, Environmental Management.

[65]  H. Pereira,et al.  Assessing Ecosystem Services at Different Scales in the Portugal Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2007 .

[66]  Ana Cristina Cardoso,et al.  Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management , 2016 .

[67]  N. Hanley The economics of nitrate pollution , 1990 .

[68]  Y. Che,et al.  Assessing the health of an urban stream: a case study of Suzhou Creek in Shanghai, China , 2012, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[69]  K. Limburg,et al.  Connecting the ecological-economic dots in human-dominated watersheds: Models to link socio-economic activities on the landscape to stream ecosystem health , 2009 .

[70]  Yuyu Liu,et al.  River ecosystem assessment and application in ecological restorations: A mathematical approach based on evaluating its structure and function , 2015 .

[71]  Managing water resources for sustainable development: the case of integrated river basin management in China. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[72]  S. Malpezzi,et al.  Hedonic Pricing Models: A Selective and Applied Review , 2008 .

[73]  A. Kosenius,et al.  Ecosystem benefits from coastal habitats—A three-country choice experiment , 2015 .

[74]  Mario Lepage,et al.  Restoring fish ecological quality in estuaries: Implication of interactive and cumulative effects among anthropogenic stressors. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[75]  B. Balana,et al.  Assessing the willingness to pay for reliable domestic water supply via catchment management: results from a contingent valuation survey in Nairobi City, Kenya , 2013 .

[76]  Sally Eden,et al.  Ecological versus Social Restoration? How Urban River Restoration Challenges but Also Fails to Challenge the Science – Policy Nexus in the United Kingdom , 2006 .

[77]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[78]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The Importance of Social Learning in Restoring the Multifunctionality of Rivers and Floodplains , 2006 .

[79]  Tran Vo Hung Son,et al.  Household Demand for Improved Water Services in Ho Chi Minh City: A Comparison of Contingent Valuation and Choice Modeling Estimates , 2005 .

[80]  Tianming Huang,et al.  Sources of water pollution and evolution of water quality in the Wuwei basin of Shiyang river, Northwest China. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[81]  M. Morelle,et al.  Econometric treatment of few protest responses in willingness-to-pay studies: An application in health care , 2012 .

[82]  J. Manderson,et al.  Determining the willingness to pay for ecosystem service restoration in a degraded coastal watershed: A ninth grade investigation , 2014 .

[83]  Michael Getzner,et al.  Temporal stability of individual preferences for river restoration in Austria using a choice experiment. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[84]  J. Allan,et al.  The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales , 1997 .

[85]  Seung-Jun Kwak,et al.  Valuing environmental impacts of large dam construction in Korea: An application of choice experiments , 2008 .

[86]  A. Bartczak,et al.  Should we pay, and to whom, for biodiversity enhancement in private forests? An empirical study of attitudes towards payments for forest ecosystem services in Poland , 2015 .