Construal Level Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior: Time Frame Effects on Salient Belief Generation

This study tests implications of different time specifications in behavioral definitions as used in belief-elicitation research. Using construal level theory and the theory of planned behavior as complementary frameworks, the authors examined temporal frame effects on beliefs about eating fruits and vegetables and beliefs about condom use generated in a belief-elicitation study. Consistent with propositions from construal level theory, the authors found that temporal perspective (performing the behavior tomorrow, in 3 months, in 6 months, or in 5 years) affects the type of salient behavioral beliefs, such that individuals generate more feasibility (efficacy) beliefs when thinking about proximal behaviors, but more desirability (attitudinal and normative) beliefs when the behavior in question is distal. The authors' results indicate the importance of time frame in behavioral definitions in belief-elicitation research.

[1]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Analyzing data to obtain information to design targeted interventions , 2001 .

[2]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior. , 2007, Journal of consumer psychology : the official journal of the Society for Consumer Psychology.

[3]  Frank F Eves,et al.  Are beliefs elicited biased by question order? A theory of planned behaviour belief elicitation study about walking in the UK general population. , 2007, British journal of health psychology.

[4]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Hypertension in the San Antonio Heart Study and the Mexico City Diabetes Study: sociocultural correlates. , 1996 .

[5]  S. Orbell,et al.  Temporal framing and the decision to take part in type 2 diabetes screening: effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on persuasion. , 2006, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[6]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  M. Fishbein.  The role of theory in HIV prevention , 2000, AIDS care.

[8]  M. Fishbein,et al.  The use of theory based semistructured elicitation questionnaires: formative research for CDC's Prevention Marketing Initiative. , 1996, Public health reports.

[9]  Y. Trope,et al.  The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. , 1998 .

[10]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Temporal construal. , 2003, Psychological review.

[11]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[12]  Y. Trope,et al.  The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Stefan M. Herzog,et al.  Temporal distance and ease of retrieval. , 2007 .

[14]  T. Rakow,et al.  Individual differences in sensitivity to health communications: consideration of future consequences. , 2004, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[15]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  An examination of the Fishbein-Ajzen behavioral-intentions model's concepts and measures ☆ , 1981 .

[16]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. , 2003 .

[17]  Y. Trope,et al.  Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[19]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .