Assessment of lumbar spine kinematics using dynamic MRI: a proposed mechanism of sagittal plane motion induced by manual posterior-to-anterior mobilization.

STUDY DESIGN Descriptive study. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to describe the segmental motion of the lumbar spine during a posterior-to-anterior (PA) mobilization procedure using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and to propose a mechanism of the lumbar spine's motion as a result of a PA force to a lumbar spinous process. BACKGROUND Studies reporting kinematic descriptions of PA mobilization are in agreement that motion takes place at all lumbar vertebrae. However, these studies differ in the reported direction of motion. METHODS AND MEASURES Twenty asymptomatic subjects (mean age +/- SD, 31.1 +/- 7.0 years) participated in this study. For each subject, a PA mobilization force was manually applied at each lumbar spinous process while sagittal plane magnetic resonance images were simultaneously obtained. Intervertebral motion was defined as the change in the intervertebral angle between the resting and end range vertebral positions imparted by the PA pressure. RESULTS PA force applied at 1 spinous process caused motion at the target vertebra and this motion was propagated caudally and cranially. Motion at the target segment was always into extension. CONCLUSIONS A PA force applied at a single lumbar spinous process caused motion of the entire lumbar region. The magnitude and direction of intervertebral motions varied with the segment at which the PA force was applied. We postulated that the intervertebral motion induced by a PA force on a spinous process could be in part explained by the morphology of the lumbar spine.

[1]  O. Airaksinen,et al.  The efficacy of active rehabilitation in chronic low back pain. Effect on pain intensity, self-experienced disability, and lumbar fatigability. , 1999, Spine.

[2]  R. Lee,et al.  An in vivo study of the intervertebral movements produced by posteroanterior mobilization. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  L. Haugh,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Three‐Week Trial of Spinal Manipulation, Transcutaneous Muscle Stimulation, Massage and Corset in the Treatment of Subacute Low Back Pain , 1994, Spine.

[4]  M. Lee,et al.  Effect of direction of applied mobilization force on the posteroanterior response in the lumbar spine. , 2001, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[5]  Spinal manipulation for low back pain. , 1981, JAMA.

[6]  D. Yates Vertebral Manipulation , 1973 .

[7]  L. Twomey A rationale for the treatment of back pain and joint pain by manual therapy. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[8]  Tony S Keller,et al.  Force-deformation response of the lumbar spine: a sagittal plane model of posteroanterior manipulation and mobilization. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  R. Adams,et al.  An investigation of the relationship between low back pain and lumbar posteroanterior stiffness. , 1996, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[10]  L. Bouter,et al.  The Effectiveness of Manual Therapy, Physiotherapy, and Treatment by the General Practitioner for Nonspecific Back and Neck Complaints: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 1992, Spine.

[11]  K. Malcolm Tillotson,et al.  Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[12]  K. Kulig,et al.  Segmental mobility of the lumbar spine during a posterior to anterior mobilization: assessment using dynamic MRI. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  Jane Latimer,et al.  Objective manual assessment of lumbar posteroanterior stiffness is now possible. , 2003, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[14]  S. Kumar,et al.  Posteroanterior spinal mobilization: state of the art review and discussion. , 1997, Disability and rehabilitation.