Enhancing information sharing in group support systems (GSS)

Decision-making groups collectively have a larger information pool than any individual within the group. When groups employ group support systems (GSS) for discussion, task-relevant information that is common to all is exchanged more frequently than information that is unique to one person alone. Not only that, GSS groups also exhibit a lack of information processing with regards to unique information that members contribute during group discussion. A laboratory experiment was used to evaluate (1) the level of information exchange in GSS groups and (2) the effects of expertise role-assignment on the pooling and processing of unique information in GSS groups given two different pre-discussion information distributions. Forty-eight 3-members groups participated in a group judgment task, which required them to decide the most likely murderer from 3 suspects, in a murder case. Results indicated that regular GSS groups tend to pool more common information and partially shared information as compared to unique information. When role-assigned, GSS groups pooled more unique information during discussion and retained more unique information after discussion than non-role-assigned groups. As a result, role-assigned GSS groups had sufficient information to identify the most likely murderer in the murder mystery, as compared to regular GSS groups.

[1]  P. Kim.  When What You KnowCanHurt You: A Study of Experiential Effects on Group Discussion and Performance , 1997 .

[2]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[3]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. , 1989 .

[4]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Investigating the Moderators of the Group Support Systems Use with Meta-Analysis , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[6]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  The equalizing impact of a group support system on status differentials , 1999, TOIS.

[7]  R. Moreland.  Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. , 1999 .

[8]  R. Daft,et al.  A Proposed Integration among Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. , 1984 .

[9]  J. McGrath.  Groups interacting with technology: the complex and dynamic fit of group, task, technology, and time , 1992, CSCW '92.

[10]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic Meeting Support: The GroupSystems Concept , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[11]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[12]  J. R. Larson,et al.  The Impact of Experts on Information Sharing During Group Discussion , 2002 .

[13]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Technology, Group Process, and Group Outcomes: Testing the Connections in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Groups , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Garold Stasser,et al.  The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. , 1999 .

[16]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[17]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can't Make It Think , 1996, MIS Q..

[18]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling Unshared Information: The Benefits of Knowing How Access to Information Is Distributed among Group Members , 2000 .

[19]  A. Van Hiel,et al.  Effects of Partially Shared Information and Awareness of Unshared Information on Information Sampling , 1996 .

[20]  Ned Kock,et al.  Asynchronous and distributed process improvement: the role of collaborative technologies , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[21]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[22]  G. Stasser,et al.  Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. , 1987 .

[23]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[24]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: the pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[26]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[27]  D. Wegner.  A Computer Network Model of Human Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[28]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[29]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[30]  Brian E. Mennecke,et al.  Using group support systems to discover hidden profiles: an examination of the influence of group size and meeting structures on information sharing and decision quality , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  J. Levine,et al.  Shared Cognition in-Organizations: The Management of Knowledge , 1999 .

[32]  Ross Hightower,et al.  Effects of Communication Mode and Prediscussion Information Distribution Characteristics on Information Exchange in Groups , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  E. Weldon,et al.  Felt dispensability in groups of coactors: The effects of shared responsibility and explicit anonymity on cognitive effort , 1988 .

[34]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Facilitator Influence in Group Support Systems: Intended and Unintended Effects , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[36]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  The Social Construction of Meaning: An Alternative Perspective on Information Sharing , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[38]  R. Hightower,et al.  The impact of computer-mediated communication systems on biased group discussion , 1995 .

[39]  Ken T. Trotman,et al.  Member Variation, Recognition of Expertise, and Group Performance , 1987 .

[40]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .