Cerebral Asymmetry of the “Top-Down” Allocation of Attention to Global and Local Features

Neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies have indicated that global and local features of a visual scene are processed differentially by the two hemispheres. Although visual selective attention is suggested to play a role in the hemispheric asymmetry, the precise mechanism of attentional control for the global-local processing is not fully understood. We investigated the neural correlates of cerebral asymmetry in directing attention to the global pattern and local components of a hierarchical stimulus. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded while the subjects shifted their attention to the global or local level of a hierarchically structured letter. The shift direction was controlled by a preceding cue stimulus. The ERPs to the cue stimuli demonstrated that the right temporal-parietal and left posterior temporal regions were differentially activated during attentional allocation to the global and local levels, respectively. These effects started 240 msec after the cue stimulus. The late ERP components to the target stimuli also manifested the hemispheric global-local asymmetry as seen during the attentional shift. These electrophysiological results provided an asymmetrical neural basis for the "top-down" allocation of attention to global and local features and revealed the contribution of the temporal-parietal cortex to this attentional mechanism.

[1]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Attention and interference in the processing of global and local information: Effects of unilateral temporal-parietal junction lesions , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  A Zani,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of a perceptual precedence of global vs. local visual information. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.

[5]  R. Knight,et al.  Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  S. Kobayashi,et al.  Electroencephalographic activity associated with shifts of visuospatial attention. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  C D Frith,et al.  Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  H. Heinze,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical stimulus processing: Dissociation between onset and later stages of global and local target processing , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  E. Wascher,et al.  Shifting attention between global features and small details: an event-related potential study , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[10]  M. Lamb,et al.  The Two Sides of Perception , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  D. Loring,et al.  The occurrence of depressive symptoms in the preclinical phase of AD , 1999, Neurology.

[12]  R. Egly,et al.  Spatial attention and cuing to global and local levels of hierarchical structure. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[15]  J. Sergent The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Sönke Johannes,et al.  Hierarchical visual stimuli: electrophysiological evidence for separate left hemispheric global and local processing mechanisms in humans , 1996, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  M H Van Kleeck,et al.  Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: new data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  L. Robertson,et al.  Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  G. Mangun,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Global and Local Processing: A Combined PET and ERP Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Hemispneric asymmetries in global and local processing: evidence from fMRI , 1997, Neuroreport.

[22]  F. Kitterle,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of absolute versus relative spatial frequency , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[23]  A. Nowicka,et al.  Visual-spatial-frequency model of cerebral asymmetry: a critical survey of behavioral and electrophysiological studies. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  L. Robertson,et al.  Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Coltheart Hemispheric asymmetry , 1978, Nature.