In Situ Calibration of Light Sensors for Long-Term Monitoring of Vegetation

Light sensors are increasingly used to monitor vegetation growing status by measuring reflectance or transmittance in multispectral or photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) bands. The measurements are then used to estimate vegetation indices or the fraction of absorbed PAR (FPAR) in a continuous and long-term manner and to serve as inputs to environmental monitoring and calibration/validation data for satellite remote sensing. However, light-sensor calibration is often overlooked or not properly attended to, which leads to difficulties when comparing the measurement results across sites and through time. In this paper, we investigate a practical and accurate user-level in situ calibration method in daylight. The calibration of a sensor pair is made for measuring either bihemispherical reflectance or hemispherical-conical reflectance, which are the two most common ground-based spectral measurements. Procedures and considerations are suggested for user calibration. We also provide a method for calibrating and measuring a single-sensor reflectance-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) from red and near-infrared bands. The calibration error propagation is analyzed, and the induced uncertainties in vegetation reflectance and in the NDVI are evaluated. The analysis and field measurements show that the NDVI estimated from a user calibration factor can be as accurate as, or even more accurate than, the manufacturer's calibration. The in situ calibration described here remedies the situation where reflectance for large field-of-view sensors cannot be always estimated from the manufacturer's calibration. The method developed in this paper may help improve the reliability of long-term field spectral measurements and contributes to the near-surface remote sensing of vegetation.

[1]  B. Pinty,et al.  GEMI: a non-linear index to monitor global vegetation from satellites , 1992, Vegetatio.

[2]  M. Schildhauer,et al.  Spectral Network (SpecNet)—What is it and why do we need it? , 2006 .

[3]  John A. Gamon,et al.  A mobile tram system for systematic sampling of ecosystem optical properties , 2006 .

[4]  Serge Rambal,et al.  Evaluation of the potential of MODIS satellite data to predict vegetation phenology in different biomes: An investigation using ground-based NDVI measurements , 2013 .

[5]  Edward J. Milton,et al.  Reference panel anisotropy and diffuse radiation - some implications for field spectroscopy , 2000 .

[6]  J. Gamon,et al.  The photochemical reflectance index: an optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient levels , 1997, Oecologia.

[7]  J. Monteith Light Distribution and Photosynthesis in Field Crops , 1965 .

[8]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Testing the performance of a novel spectral reflectance sensor, built with light emitting diodes (LEDs), to monitor ecosystem metabolism, structure and function , 2010 .

[9]  A. T. Young,et al.  Revised optical air mass tables and approximation formula. , 1989, Applied optics.

[10]  Lee A. Vierling,et al.  A simple filtered photodiode instrument for continuous measurement of narrowband NDVI and PRI over vegetated canopies , 2010 .

[11]  Lars Eklundh,et al.  An Optical Sensor Network for Vegetation Phenology Monitoring and Satellite Data Calibration , 2011, Sensors.

[12]  Edward J. Milton,et al.  Calibration of dual‐beam spectroradiometric data , 2006 .

[13]  Thomas Hilker,et al.  Detection of foliage conditions and disturbance from multi-angular high spectral resolution remote sensing , 2009 .

[14]  Lars Eklundh,et al.  High-resolution satellite data reveal an increase in peak growing season gross primary production in a high-Arctic wet tundra ecosystem 1992-2008 , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[15]  R. Fensholt,et al.  Evaluation of MODIS LAI, fAPAR and the relation between fAPAR and NDVI in a semi-arid environment using in situ measurements , 2004 .

[16]  N. Coops,et al.  Instrumentation and approach for unattended year round tower based measurements of spectral reflectance , 2007 .

[17]  K. Soudani,et al.  Ground-based Network of NDVI measurements for tracking temporal dynamics of canopy structure and vegetation phenology in different biomes , 2012 .

[18]  J. Pontailler A cheap quantum sensor using a gallium arsenide photodiode , 1990 .

[19]  M. Rossini,et al.  Inter-comparison of hemispherical conical reflectance factors (HCRF) measured with four fibre-based spectrometers. , 2013, Optics express.

[20]  Rebecca N. Handcock,et al.  Ground-Based Optical Measurements at European Flux Sites: A Review of Methods, Instruments and Current Controversies , 2011, Sensors.

[21]  R. Heins,et al.  Photometric, Radiometric, and Quantum Light Units of Measure: A Review of Procedures for Interconversion , 1983, HortScience.

[22]  Leonard Steinborn,et al.  International Organization for Standardization ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories , 2004 .

[23]  G. Birth,et al.  Measuring the Color of Growing Turf with a Reflectance Spectrophotometer1 , 1968 .

[24]  F. E. Nicodemus,et al.  Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance , 1977 .

[25]  Jean-Yves Pontailler,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index using ground-based remote sensed NDVI measurements: validation and comparison with two indirect techniques , 2003 .

[26]  A simple red:far-red sensor using gallium arsenide phosphide detectors , 1996 .

[27]  Y. Ohno NIST Measurement Services: Photometric Calibration , 1997 .

[28]  J. Maranville,et al.  Photosynthesis Light Sensor and Meter , 1971 .

[29]  S. Standard GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[30]  A. Huete,et al.  A comparison of vegetation indices over a global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS , 1997 .

[31]  I. Reda,et al.  Solar position algorithm for solar radiation applications , 2004 .

[32]  L. Eklundh,et al.  A physically based vegetation index for improved monitoring of plant phenology , 2014 .