Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects

It is well established that faces, in contrast to objects, are categorized as fast or faster at the individual level (e.g., Bill Clinton) than at the basic-level (e.g., human face). This subordinate-shift from basic-level categorization has been considered an outcome of visual expertise with processing faces. However, in the present study we found that, similar to familiar faces, categorization of individually-known familiar towers is also faster at the individual level than at the basic-level in naïve participants. In addition, category-verification of familiar stimuli, at basic and superordinate levels, was slower and less accurate compared to unfamiliar stimuli. Thus, the existence of detailed semantic information, regardless of expertise, can induce a shift in the default level of object categorization from basic to individual level. Moreover, the individually-specific knowledge is not only more easily-retrieved from memory but it might also interfere with accessing more general category information.

[1]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The role of category learning in the acquisition and retention of perceptual expertise: A behavioral and neurophysiological study , 2008, Brain Research.

[2]  Lara J Pierce,et al.  The neural plasticity of other-race face recognition , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Y. Goshen-Gottstein,et al.  Perceptual integrality of sex and identity of faces: further evidence for the single-route hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  A. O'Toole,et al.  An ‘other-Race Effect’ for Categorizing Faces by Sex , 1996, Perception.

[6]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[7]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Robert L. Goldstone Unitization during category learning. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Hideki Ohira,et al.  An ERP study on self-relevant object recognition , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  B. Ross,et al.  Concepts and Categories , 1994 .

[12]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  A Reevaluation of the Electrophysiological Correlates of Expert Object Processing , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Thomas H. Carr,et al.  Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[17]  Eleanor J. Gibson,et al.  An Odyssey in Learning and Perception , 1991 .

[18]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Concepts and Categories , 2005 .

[19]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[20]  J. Tanaka The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The Training and Transfer of Real-World Perceptual Expertise , 2005, Psychological science.

[22]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[23]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[24]  H. Brownell,et al.  Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Kathy E. Johnson,et al.  Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.