The Impact of Distractions on the Usability and the Adoption of Mobile Devices for Wireless Data Services

Mobile devices are becoming increasingly popular, having already reached over 1.5 billion mobile subscribers. Although progress has been made in terms of technological innovations, usability challenges still face m-Business (mobile business) application. This paper explores how the context of use impacts the usability of mobile devices. An empirical study was undertaken to investigate the impact of distractions on the usability and its subsequent effect on consumers’ behavioural intention towards using a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) for wireless data services. Distractions were simulated in this study in the form of either user motion or environmental noise (i.e. background auditory and visual stimuli). A structural equation modelling analysis confirmed the impacts of distractions on perceived usability (i.e. efficiency and effectiveness) of, and in turn the users’ satisfaction with and behavioural intention to use, a PDA for wireless data services. Implications of these findings for theory, practice, and future research are outlined.

[1]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[3]  Guofu Niu,et al.  Low-Frequency Noise , 2005 .

[4]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[5]  Constantinos K. Coursaris,et al.  A Qualitative Review of Empirical Mobile Usability Studies , 2006, AMCIS.

[6]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error , 1981 .

[7]  K. Persson Waye,et al.  Low frequency noise "pollution" interferes with performance. , 2001, Noise & health.

[8]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[9]  Debora Viana Thompson,et al.  Defeating feature fatigue. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[10]  Christina L. James,et al.  Text input for mobile devices: comparing model prediction to actual performance , 2001, CHI.

[11]  D H Holding,et al.  The effects of noise and speech on cognitive task performance. , 1993, The Journal of general psychology.

[12]  Vikas Mittal,et al.  Attribute-Level Performance, Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions over Time: A Consumption-System Approach , 1999 .

[13]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[14]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Milena M. Head,et al.  Ubiquitous Usability: Exploring Mobile Interfaces within the Context of a Theoretical Model , 2003, CAiSE Workshops.

[16]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Jan Stage,et al.  New techniques for usability evaluation of mobile systems , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[19]  Kerry Rodden,et al.  Effective Web Searching on Mobile Devices , 2004 .

[20]  E. Schröger,et al.  A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioral and event-related indices. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  S. Stansfeld,et al.  Noise and Health in the Urban Environment , 2000, Reviews on environmental health.

[22]  V. Mittal,et al.  Attribute-Level Performance, Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions over Time: A Consumption-System Approach , 1999 .

[23]  Tomas Lindroth,et al.  Rigour meets relevance when usability goes mobile , 2001 .

[24]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[25]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[26]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? , 2000, CHI.

[27]  Sylvain Bruni,et al.  The Role of Instant Messaging on Task Performance and Level of Arousal , 2004 .

[28]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[29]  Kari Kallinen,et al.  The effects of background music on using a pocket computer in a cafeteria: immersion, emotional responses, and social richness of medium , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[30]  Steven A. Taylor,et al.  An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers' purchase intentions , 1994 .

[31]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  Using mental load for managing interruptions in physiologically attentive user interfaces , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[32]  Jack Duffy,et al.  Using large tables on small display devices , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[34]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[35]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Using Distraction-Conflict Theory to Measure the Effects of Distractions on Individual Task Performance in a Wireless Mobile Environment , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[36]  Peter Tarasewich,et al.  Designing mobile commerce applications , 2003, CACM.

[37]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[38]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Indispensable benefits and unavoidable costs of unattended sound for cognitive functioning. , 2003, Noise & health.

[39]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  The SOCO Scale: A measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. , 1982 .

[40]  K Honda,et al.  Influence of noise on heart rate and quantity of work in mental work. , 1992, The Annals of physiological anthropology = Seiri Jinruigaku Kenkyukai kaishi.

[41]  Michael J. Albers,et al.  Content and Complexity: Information Design in Technical Communication , 2002 .

[42]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[43]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  A Framework for the Study of Customer Interface Design for Mobile Commerce , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[44]  Miles MacLeod,et al.  Usability measurement in context , 1994, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[45]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[46]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  Dana Chisnell,et al.  Handbook of Usability Testing , 2009 .

[48]  Gregory Neely,et al.  Cognitive performance and subjective experience during combined exposures to whole-body vibration and noise , 2004, International archives of occupational and environmental health.