Improving Hydrological Process Modeling Using Optimized Threshold-Based Wavelet De-Noising Technique

The extent of the noise on hydrological data is inevitable, which reduces the efficiency of Data-Driven Models (DDMs). Despite of this fact that the DDMs such as Artificial Neural Network (ANN) are capable of nonlinear functional mapping between a set of input and output variables, but refining of the time series through data pre-processing methods can provide with the possibility to increase the performance of these set of models. The main objective of this study is to propose a new method called Optimized Threshold-Based Wavelet De-noising technique (OTWD) to de-noise hydrological time series and improve the prediction accuracy while the DDM is being used. For this purpose, in the first step, Wavelet-ANN (WNN) model was developed for identifying suitable wavelet function and maximum decomposition level. Afterward, sub-signals of original precipitation time series which were determined in the first step were de-noised by using of OTWD technique. Therefore, these clean sub-signals of precipitation time series were imposed as input data to the ANN to predict the precipitation one time step ahead. The results showed that OTWD technique could improve the efficiency of WNN model dramatically; this outcome was reported by the different efficiency criterions such as Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE = 0.92), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE = 0.0103), coefficient correlation of linear regression (R = 0.93), Peak Value Criterion (PVC = 0.021) and Low Value Criterion (LVC = 0.026). The best fitted WNN model in comparison by proposed model showed weaker performance by the NSE, RMSE, R, PVC and LVC values of 0.86, 0.043, 0.87, 0.034 and 0.045, respectively.

[1]  Dong Wang,et al.  The relation between periods’ identification and noises in hydrologic series data , 2009 .

[2]  O. Kisi Wavelet Regression Model as an Alternative to Neural Networks for River Stage Forecasting , 2011 .

[3]  M. Scheuerer Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting using Ensemble Model Output Statistics , 2013, 1302.0893.

[4]  Shie-Yui Liong,et al.  Singapore Rainfall Behavior: Chaotic? , 1999 .

[5]  Jan Adamowski,et al.  Development of a coupled wavelet transform and neural network method for flow forecasting of non-perennial rivers in semi-arid watersheds. , 2010 .

[6]  Vahid Nourani,et al.  A new hybrid algorithm for rainfall–runoff process modeling based on the wavelet transform and genetic fuzzy system , 2014 .

[7]  Mongkol Raksapatcharawong,et al.  Rainfall estimation for real time flood monitoring using geostationary meteorological satellite data , 2015 .

[8]  Jyh-Cheng Chen,et al.  Development of wavelet de-noising technique for PET images. , 2005, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[9]  Andrea Petroselli,et al.  Curve-Number/Green-Ampt Mixed Procedure for Net Rainfall Estimation: A Case Study of the Mignone Watershed, IT , 2013 .

[10]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[11]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Estimating Spatial Precipitation Using Regression Kriging and Artificial Neural Network Residual Kriging (RKNNRK) Hybrid Approach , 2015, Water Resources Management.

[12]  Sunmin Kim,et al.  Improvement of rainfall and flood forecasts by blending ensemble NWP rainfall with radar prediction considering orographic rainfall , 2015 .

[13]  Sanjeet Kumar,et al.  Reservoir Inflow Forecasting Using Ensemble Models Based on Neural Networks, Wavelet Analysis and Bootstrap Method , 2015, Water Resources Management.

[14]  Paul S. Addison,et al.  Wavelet Transform Analysis of Open Channel Wake Flows , 2001 .

[15]  Y. R. Satyaji Rao,et al.  Time Series Modeling of River Flow Using Wavelet Neural Networks , 2011 .

[16]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[17]  R. Ibbitt,et al.  Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: Use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model , 2007 .

[18]  Vahid Nourani,et al.  A Multivariate ANN-Wavelet Approach for Rainfall–Runoff Modeling , 2009 .

[19]  B. Bobée,et al.  Improving extreme hydrologic events forecasting using a new criterion for artificial neural network selection , 2001 .

[20]  Peyman Abbaszadeh,et al.  Author ' s personal copy A new hybrid arti fi cial neural networks for rainfall – runoff process modeling , 2013 .

[21]  Konstantine P. Georgakakos,et al.  A hydrologically useful station precipitation model: 1. Formulation , 1984 .

[22]  Chien-ming Chou A Threshold Based Wavelet Denoising Method for Hydrological Data Modelling , 2011 .

[23]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[24]  Peyman Abbaszadeh,et al.  A new hybrid artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff process modeling , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[25]  Maria Eduarda Silva,et al.  Deterministic versus stochastic trends: Detection and challenges , 2009 .

[26]  Jun Guo,et al.  Monthly streamflow forecasting based on improved support vector machine model , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  J. Adamowski,et al.  A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting , 2011 .

[28]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Dual state-parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter , 2005 .

[29]  Paul Tseng,et al.  Robust wavelet denoising , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..