Incidental findings in genetic research and clinical diagnostic tests: A systematic review

Incidental findings arise when clinically relevant genetic information about a research participant or patient is identified outside the scope of the original research objective or diagnostic test being performed. These findings can relate to carrier status for a heritable condition, misattributed paternity or increased susceptibility to a medical condition. The decision whether to disclose these findings to the research subject or patient is underpinned by many ethical, moral, and potentially legal considerations. There is an urgent need for definitive guidelines for researchers and healthcare professionals. We performed a systematic review of the relevant literature concerning the disclosure of incidental findings, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses recommendations, using the prescribed flowchart and checklist. At initial screening, 473 articles were retrieved. The inclusion and exclusion criteria aimed at obtaining data that were relevant and of sufficient quality were applied and a total of four relevant studies were identified, comprising 2,680 individual participants and 1,023 guidance documents. Major themes emerging from the included articles include patient autonomy, patient welfare, harmful secrets, and genetic literacy. The lack of relevant studies emphasizes the urgent need for empirical investigations into the disclosure or non‐disclosure of genetic incidental findings, and the provision of guidelines to assist healthcare professionals and researchers. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  S. Taylor,et al.  A Population-Based Survey in Australia of Men’s and Women’s Perceptions of Genetic Risk and Predictive Genetic Testing and Implications for Primary Care , 2011, Public Health Genomics.

[2]  Janet K. Williams,et al.  Implications for educating the next generation of nurses on genetics and genomics in the 21st century. , 2011, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[3]  P. Groves Work (made) for hire , 2011 .

[4]  A. A. Wismeijer Secrets and Subjective Well-Being: A Clinical Oxymoron , 2011 .

[5]  Peter R. Thom,et al.  Genome-wide association studies of cancer predisposition. , 2010, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[6]  Kenneth Offit,et al.  Genome-wide association studies of cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  L. Koehly,et al.  Age Differences in Genetic Knowledge, Health Literacy and Causal Beliefs for Health Conditions , 2010, Public Health Genomics.

[8]  W. Burke,et al.  Researcher Perspectives on Disclosure of Incidental Findings in Genetic Research , 2010, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[9]  Genetic competence of midwives in the UK and Japan. , 2010, Nursing & health sciences.

[10]  Peter R. Thom,et al.  Genome-wide association studies of cancer: principles and potential utility. , 2010, Oncology.

[11]  Leslie G Biesecker,et al.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. , 2010, American journal of human genetics.

[12]  Heather Skirton,et al.  Genetic education and the challenge of genomic medicine: development of core competences to support preparation of health professionals in Europe , 2010, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[13]  K. Patrick,et al.  Future health applications of genomics: priorities for communication, behavioral, and social sciences research. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  S. Kardia,et al.  Understandings of Basic Genetics in the United States: Results from a National Survey of Black and White Men and Women , 2010, Public Health Genomics.

[15]  Y. Bombard,et al.  Clinical obligations and public health programmes: healthcare provider reasoning about managing the incidental results of newborn screening , 2009, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[16]  Christoph Lange,et al.  Assessing the reproducibility of asthma candidate gene associations, using genome-wide data. , 2009, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[17]  R. Eeles,et al.  Genome-wide association studies in cancer. , 2008, Human molecular genetics.

[18]  C. Ballantyne Allergy genes flew the coop, according to evolutionary analysis , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[19]  Scott T. Weiss,et al.  Creating and evaluating genetic tests predictive of drug response , 2008, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[20]  Sarah Franklin,et al.  To know or not to know? , 2008, Nature.

[21]  F. Lawrenz,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Current Approaches to Incidental Findings , 2008, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[22]  Frances P Lawrenz,et al.  Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations , 2008, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[23]  B. Ness,et al.  Genomic Research and Incidental Findings , 2008 .

[24]  H. Richardson Incidental Findings and Ancillary-Care Obligations , 2008, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[25]  Erica K. Lucast Informed Consent and the Misattributed Paternity Problem in Genetic Counseling , 2007, Bioethics.

[26]  Bohn Stafleu van Loghum,et al.  Online … , 2002, LOG IN.

[27]  J. Cassiman,et al.  Presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers , 2006, Clinical genetics.

[28]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[29]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[30]  Lyn Turney The Incidental Discovery of Nonpaternity Through Genetic Carrier Screening: An Exploration of Lay Attitudes , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[31]  M. Fabrizio,et al.  Misattributed paternity in a living related donor: to disclose or not to disclose? , 2004, Urology.

[32]  S. Kardia,et al.  Exploring the Public Understanding of Basic Genetic Concepts , 2004, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[33]  J. Lieb,et al.  ChIP-chip: considerations for the design, analysis, and application of genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. , 2004, Genomics.

[34]  Robert C. Lee,et al.  STANDARD QUALITY ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING PRIMARY RESEARCH PAPERS FROM A VARIETY OF FIELDS , 2004 .

[35]  Marni J. Falk,et al.  Medical geneticists' duty to warn at‐risk relatives for genetic disease , 2003, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[36]  M. Craft-Rosenberg,et al.  The disclosure decisions of parents who conceive children using donor eggs. , 2002, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[37]  B. Wilfond,et al.  Ethical issues with genetic testing in pediatrics. , 2013, Pediatrics.

[38]  Jennifer Attride-Stirling Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research , 2001 .

[39]  M. Parker Genetics and the Interpersonal Elaboration of Ethics , 2001, Theoretical medicine and bioethics.

[40]  L. d'Agincourt-Canning Experiences of genetic risk: disclosure and the gendering of responsibility. , 2001, Bioethics.

[41]  M. Parker,et al.  Revealing false paternity: some ethical considerations , 2001, The Lancet.

[42]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[43]  International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome , 2001, Nature.

[44]  C Scanlon,et al.  A Professional Code of Ethics Provides Guidance for Genetic Nursing Practice , 2000, Nursing ethics.

[45]  Anita L. Vangelisti,et al.  Revealing Family Secrets: The Influence of Topic, Function, and Relationships , 1997 .

[46]  L. Ross Disclosing misattributed paternity. , 1996, Bioethics.

[47]  Wolfgang Hirczy A new twist in divorce: paternity tests as Solomon's sword , 1994 .

[48]  N. C. Avery Family secrets. , 1982, Psychoanalytic review.

[49]  M. Karpel Family secrets: I. Conceptual and ethical issues in the relational context. II. Ethical and practical considerations in therapeutic management. , 1980 .

[50]  Harold Garfinkel,et al.  Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies , 1956, American Journal of Sociology.