An estimation of US industry-level capital–labor substitution elasticities: support for Cobb–Douglas

A key parameter that determines the distributional impacts of a policy shift in general equilibrium models is the elasticity of substitution between capital and labor. Despite the importance of this parameter in applied modeling, its identification continues to pose a challenge. Given the structure of most growth models, we posit that the true relationship between capital and labor is likely to be close to Cobb–Douglas. Using a rich new data set from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), we estimate substitution elasticities for 28 industries that cover the entire economy, and provide an indication of the long- and short-run ranges of those estimates. We fail to reject the Cobb–Douglas specification in 20 of the 28 industries. These findings lend support to the Cobb–Douglas specification as a transparent starting point in simulation analysis.

[1]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Carbon Taxes and Economic Welfare , 1992 .

[2]  H. Scarf,et al.  Applied General Equilibrium Analysis , 1984 .

[3]  Thomas F. Rutherford,et al.  A Comparison of the Performance of Flexible Functional Forms for Use in Applied General Equilibrium Modelling , 1998 .

[4]  P. Wilcoxen.  The effects of environmental regulation and energy prices on U.S. economic performance , 1988 .

[5]  Daniel E. Sichel,et al.  Tax Incentives and Equipment Investment , 1993 .

[6]  M. Nadiri,et al.  Investment Behavior and Neo-Classical Theory , 1968 .

[7]  G. González-Farías,et al.  A comparison of unit root test criteria , 1994 .

[8]  H. Scarf,et al.  Econometric Methods for Applied General Equilibrium Analysis , 1984 .

[9]  P. Wilcoxen,et al.  What to expect from an international system of tradable permits for carbon emissions , 1999 .

[10]  K. Arrow,et al.  Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency , 1961 .

[11]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  How robust is applied general equilibrium analysis , 1993 .

[12]  Bob Chirinko,et al.  Business Fixed Investment Spending: Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications , 1993 .

[13]  Ernst R. Berndt,et al.  Reconciling Alternative Estimates of the Elasticity of Substitution , 1976 .

[14]  N. Kaldor.  Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth , 1961 .

[15]  Ernst R. Berndt,et al.  The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary. , 1992 .

[16]  R. Barro,et al.  Inflation and Economic Growth , 1995 .

[17]  Bob Chirinko.  Business fixed investment spending: a critical survey of modeling strategies, empirical results, and policy implications , 1992 .

[18]  Andrew P. Meyer,et al.  How responsive is business capital formation to its user cost?: An exploration with micro data , 1999 .

[19]  R. McKitrick.  The econometric critique of computable general equilibrium modeling: the role of functional forms , 1998 .

[20]  C. Granger,et al.  Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing , 1987 .

[21]  D. Cochrane,et al.  Application of Least Squares Regression to Relationships Containing Auto-Correlated Error Terms , 1949 .