Simulating effects of signage, groups, and crowds on emergent evacuation patterns

Studies of past emergency events have revealed that occupants’ behaviors, egress signage system, local geometry, and environmental constraints affect crowd movement and govern the building evacuation. In addition to complying with code and standards, building designers need to consider the occupants’ social characteristics and the unique layout of the buildings to design occupant-centric egress systems. This paper describes an agent-based egress simulation tool, SAFEgress, which incorporates important human and social behaviors observed by researchers in safety and disaster management. Agents in SAFEgress are capable of perceiving building emergency features in the virtual environment and deciding their behaviors and navigation. In particular, we describe four agent behavioral models, namely following familiar exits, following cues from building features, navigating with social groups, and following crowds. We use SAFEgress to study how agents (mimicking building occupants) react to different signage arrangements in a modeled environment. We explore agents’ reactions to cues as an emergent phenomenon, shaped by the interactions among groups and crowds. Simulation results from the prototype reveal that different designs of building emergency features and levels of group interactions can trigger different crowd flow patterns and affect overall egress performance. By considering the occupants’ perception about the emergency features using the SAFEgress prototype, engineers, designers, and facility managers can study the human factors that may influence an egress situation and, thereby, improve the design of SAFEgress systems and procedures.

[1]  Yiqing Lin,et al.  Agent-Based Simulation of Evacuation: An Office Building Case Study , 2010 .

[2]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  How the Ocean Personality Model Affects the Perception of Crowds , 2011, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[3]  Xiaoshan Pan,et al.  Computational modeling of human and social behaviors for emergency egress analysis , 2006 .

[4]  Kincho H. Law,et al.  Computational Framework Incorporating Human Behaviors for Egress Simulations , 2013 .

[5]  B. Aguirre,et al.  A Test of the Emergent Norm Theory of Collective Behavior , 1998 .

[6]  Erica D. Kuligowski,et al.  Review of Building Evacuation Models , 2005 .

[7]  Paul A. Reneke Evacuation Decision Model , 2013 .

[8]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Implementation of cognitive mapping, spatial representation and wayfinding behaviours of people within evacuation modelling tools , 2009 .

[9]  Michael O'Neill,et al.  Effects of Signage and Floor Plan Configuration on Wayfinding Accuracy , 1991 .

[10]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[11]  Xiaoping Zheng,et al.  Modeling crowd evacuation of a building based on seven methodological approaches , 2009 .

[12]  C. Mcphail The myth of the madding crowd , 1991 .

[13]  J. Zittartz,et al.  Cellular Automaton Approach to Pedestrian Dynamics - Applications , 2001, cond-mat/0112119.

[14]  Jonathan D. Sime,et al.  Affiliative behaviour during escape to building exits , 1983 .

[15]  Renate Fruchter,et al.  Shikake Trigger Categories , 2013, AAAI Spring Symposium: Shikakeology.

[16]  Milind Tambe,et al.  ESCAPES: evacuation simulation with children, authorities, parents, emotions, and social comparison , 2011, AAMAS.

[17]  Kincho H. Law,et al.  SAFEgress: a flexible platform to study the effect of human and social behaviors on egress performance , 2014, ANSS 2014.

[18]  Naohiro Matsumura,et al.  A Shikake as an Embodied Trigger for Behavior Change , 2013, AAAI Spring Symposium: Shikakeology.

[19]  Adrian Kuhn Collective Behavior , 2007 .

[20]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[21]  E. Kuligowski Terror Defeated: Occupant Sensemaking, Decision-Making and Protective Action in the 2001 World Trade Center Disaster , 2011 .

[22]  A. Mawson Understanding Mass Panic and Other Collective Responses to Threat and Disaster , 2005, Psychiatry.

[23]  B E Aguirre,et al.  Normative collective behavior in the Station building fire. , 2011, Social science quarterly.

[24]  Michael K Lindell,et al.  The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  Soraia Raupp Musse,et al.  Hierarchical model for real time simulation of virtual human crowds , 2001, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[26]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Spatial orientation and wayfinding in the designed environment: A conceptual analysis and some suggestions for postoccupancy evaluation. , 1986 .

[27]  Matthias Nussbaum,et al.  Pedestrian And Evacuation Dynamics , 2016 .

[28]  Jean-Claude Latombe,et al.  Robot motion planning , 1970, The Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science.

[29]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology , 2009 .

[30]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Computational Social Science , 2009, Science.

[31]  Mark Hoogendoorn,et al.  An Agent-Based Model for the Interplay of Information and Emotion in Social Diffusion , 2010, 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[32]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Hierarchical Model for Real Time Simulation of Virtual Human Crowds , 2001, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[33]  Alan Penn,et al.  Encoding Natural Movement as an Agent-Based System: An Investigation into Human Pedestrian Behaviour in the Built Environment , 2002 .

[34]  John Drury,et al.  Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[35]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Superheroes: Using Superpowers in Virtual Reality to Encourage Prosocial Behavior , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  David V. Canter,et al.  The decision to evacuate: a study of the motivations which contribute to evacuation in the event of fire , 1985 .

[37]  Michael Schreckenberg,et al.  Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics , 2002 .

[38]  M. Macy,et al.  Social dynamics from the bottom up: Agent-based models of social interaction , 2009 .

[39]  William E. Feinberg,et al.  THE IMPACT OF EXIT INSTRUCTIONS AND NUMBER OF EXITS IN FIRE EMERGENCIES: A COMPUTER SIMULATION INVESTIGATION , 1997 .

[40]  P. Bearman,et al.  The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology , 2009 .

[41]  A. Kneidla,et al.  A hybrid multi-scale approach for simulation of pedestrian dynamics , 2013 .

[42]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[43]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  A comparison of predictions from the buildingEXODUS evacuation model with experimental data , 1998 .