Text summarization techniques: SVM versus neural networks

Automated text summarization is important to for humans to better manage the massive information explosion. Several machine learning approaches could be successfully used to handle the problem. This paper reports the results of our study to compare the performance between neural networks and support vector machines for text summarization. Both models have the ability to discover non-linear data and are effective model when dealing with large datasets.

[1]  B.A. Kiani,et al.  Intelligent Extractive Text Summarization Using Fuzzy Inference Systems , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Intelligent Systems.

[2]  K. Kaikhah Automatic text summarization with neural networks , 2004, 2004 2nd International IEEE Conference on 'Intelligent Systems'. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04EX791).

[3]  Rasim M. Alguliyev,et al.  Effective summarization method of text documents , 2005, The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'05).

[4]  Yuji Matsumoto,et al.  Extracting Important Sentences with Support Vector Machines , 2002, COLING.

[5]  Lisa F. Rau,et al.  Automatic Condensation of Electronic Publications by Sentence Selection , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..

[6]  Marko Grobelnik,et al.  Extracting Summary Sentences Based on the Document Semantic Graph , 2005 .

[7]  Wendy G. Lehnert,et al.  Information extraction , 1996, CACM.

[8]  Phyllis B. Baxendale,et al.  Machine-Made Index for Technical Literature - An Experiment , 1958, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[9]  Francine Chen,et al.  A trainable document summarizer , 1995, SIGIR '95.