Strategies of Accommodation:

This study describes a coding system developed to operationalize the sociolinguistic strategies proposed by communication accommodation theory (CAT) in an academic context. Fifty interactions between two students (of Australian or Chinese ethnic background) or a student and faculty member were videotaped. A turn-and episode-based coding system was developed, focusing on verbal and nonverbal behavior. The development of this system is described in detail, before results are presented. Results indicated that status was the main influence on choice of strategies, particularly the extent and type of discourse management and interpersonal control. Participants’ sex and ethnicity also played a role: Male participants made more use of interpretability (largely questions), whereas female participants used discourse management to develop a shared perspective. The results make clear that there is no automatic correspondence between behaviors and the strategies they constitute, and they point to the appropriateness of conceptualizing behavior and strategies separately in CAT.

[1]  H. Giles.  Communicative effectiveness as a function of accented speech , 1973 .

[2]  R. Wiseman,et al.  Intercultural communication theory , 1995 .

[3]  Nikolas Coupland,et al.  ′Miscommunication′ and Problematic Talk , 1991 .

[4]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[5]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Concomitants of Social Support: Social Skills, Physical Attractiveness and Gender. , 1985 .

[6]  R. Bales.  Interaction process analysis , 1976 .

[7]  H. Giles,et al.  Language: Contexts and Consequences , 1991 .

[8]  Sending emotional messages in marriage: Non‐verbal behaviour, sex and communication clarity , 1986 .

[9]  G. Miller,et al.  Handbook of Interpersonal Communication , 1985 .

[10]  Linda L. Carli.  Gender differences in interaction style and influence. , 1989 .

[11]  Robert T. Craig,et al.  Conversational coherence : form, structure, and strategy , 1983 .

[12]  H. Giles,et al.  Creating Intergenerational Distance: Language, Communication, and Middle-Age. , 1993 .

[13]  H. Giles,et al.  Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. , 1991 .

[14]  Cindy Gallois,et al.  Difficulties of overseas students in social and academic situations , 1991 .

[15]  H. Giles,et al.  Contexts of Accommodation , 1993 .

[16]  C. Gallois,et al.  Language and Power in an Academic Context , 1995 .

[17]  R. Bales,et al.  Personality and Interpersonal Behavior. , 1971 .

[18]  Michael Halliday.  Language As Social Semiotic , 1978 .

[19]  R. Krauss,et al.  Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. , 1988 .

[20]  Cindy Gallois,et al.  Communication and Culture: A Guide for Practice , 1997 .

[21]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Communication: The Unspoken Dialogue , 1988 .

[22]  Heidi E. Hamilton.  Contexts of Accommodation: Accommodation and mental disability , 1991 .

[23]  J. Pittam,et al.  The Mediating Role of Narrative in Intergroup Processes , 1996 .

[24]  J. Holmes.  Hedges and boosters in women's and men's speech , 1990 .

[25]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  Theories in Intercultural Communication. , 1988 .

[26]  H. Giles,et al.  Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory , 1988, Language in Society.

[27]  H. Giles,et al.  Handbook of language and social psychology , 1992 .

[28]  Stephen Bochner,et al.  National Role Evocation as a Function of Cross-National Interaction , 1971 .

[29]  Richard L. Street,et al.  Contexts of Accommodation: Accommodation in medical consultations , 1991 .

[30]  H. Giles,et al.  Speech style and social evaluation , 1975 .

[31]  K. Scherer,et al.  Social Markers in Speech , 1980 .

[32]  M. Patterson,et al.  Nonverbal Behavior: A Functional Perspective. , 1984 .

[33]  J. Gumperz.  Language and social identity: Author index , 1983 .