Mechanical characterization of hyperelastic materials with fringe projection and optimization techniques

Abstract This paper presents a new hybrid technique for mechanical characterization of hyperelastic materials. The research is motivated by the fact that standard identification procedures based on the fitting of strain–stress curves determined experimentally from planar biaxial tests may be inaccurate for non-uniform states of deformation. Therefore, we propose an alternative approach where the difference Ω between the displacement field measured with Projection Moire and its counterpart predicted by FEM is minimized using non-linear optimization algorithms that finally find unknown material properties. In order to check the feasibility of the new procedure, we considered a thin latex membrane modelling it as a two-parameter Mooney–Rivlin (MR) hyperelastic material. The Ω function is minimized either using optimization routines available in a commercial finite element package and by implementing a global optimizer able to deal with non-linearity and non-convexity included in the identification process. In order to check accuracy of optimization results, target values of MR constants for the latex specimen tested have previously been determined by fitting experimental stress–strain data gathered from a standard planar biaxial tension test. Results indicate that the present hybrid identification procedure can determine accurately properties of the hyperelastic material under investigation. In fact, the average residual error on displacements was less than 1% while the difference between the MR constants found with optimization and their target values was less than 3.5%.

[1]  Georges Limbert,et al.  A transversely isotropic viscohyperelastic material Application to the modeling of biological soft connective tissues , 2004 .

[2]  Luciano Lamberti,et al.  Improved global–local simulated annealing formulation for solving non-smooth engineering optimization problems , 2005 .

[3]  Yong Li,et al.  Optical 3-D dynamic measurement system and its application to polymer membrane inflation tests , 2000 .

[4]  M. Sacks Biaxial Mechanical Evaluation of Planar Biological Materials , 2000 .

[5]  Gary Cloud,et al.  Optical Methods of Engineering Analysis , 1996 .

[6]  Mario M. Attard,et al.  Hyperelastic constitutive modeling under finite strain , 2004 .

[7]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .

[8]  Cesar A. Sciammarella,et al.  High-accuracy contouring using projection moiré , 2005 .

[9]  S. Hwang,et al.  Determination of elastic constants of materials by vibration testing , 2000 .

[10]  W. P. De Wilde,et al.  A mixed numerical/experimental technique for the nondestructive identification of the stiffness properties of fibre reinforced composite materials , 1997 .

[11]  A. Chate,et al.  Identification of elastic properties of laminates based on experiment design , 2001 .

[12]  Gordon M. Brown,et al.  Optical Methods for Shape Measurement , 1999 .

[13]  J W Melvin,et al.  Material identification of soft tissue using membrane inflation. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Mikhail Itskov,et al.  A class of orthotropic and transversely isotropic hyperelastic constitutive models based on a polyconvex strain energy function , 2004 .

[15]  R. Ogden Non-Linear Elastic Deformations , 1984 .