Balancing the Old with the New: Creating a Typology for Explicit-Implicit CSRS Interaction

In this article the authors articulate four separate models that consider the inter-relationships between Explicit and Implicit Corporate Social Responsibility. These models suggest that the transition from a traditional and 'quiet' social responsibility approach to a strategic and more expressive communication is design is variable and influenced by both institutional and firm level factors. At the institutional level, market liberalization, social legacy, localization forces and cultural legitimacy may all help predict where firms exist along the Explicit-Implicit continuum. Organizationally, strategy, social significance, market size and space, and self-determinism to moderate the extent to which firm adopts or resists Explicit CSRS. By considering these models and their related factors individually, the authors present a rich framework to educate future research in social responsibility and social change.

[1]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Managing Power in the Multinational Corporation: How Low-Power Actors Gain Influence , 2008 .

[2]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk , 2024, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  R. Jeurissen,et al.  The glass ceiling of corporate social responsibility: Consequences of a business case approach towards CSR , 2010 .

[4]  E. Deci,et al.  Self‐determination theory and work motivation , 2005 .

[5]  John L. Campbell Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility , 2007 .

[6]  Jean‐Pascal Gond,et al.  The government of self-regulation: on the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility , 2011 .

[7]  C. Oliver SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[8]  Gregory Jackson,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Theory: New Perspectives on Private Governance , 2012 .

[9]  Maria Gjølberg Varieties of corporate social responsibility (CSR): CSR meets the “Nordic Model” , 2010 .

[10]  Gregory Jackson,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Europe: An Institutional Mirror or Substitute? , 2010 .

[11]  Tamyko Ysa,et al.  Governments and Corporate Social Responsibility: Public Policies Beyond Regulation and Voluntary Compliance , 2007 .

[12]  Majken Schultz,et al.  The ‘Catch 22’ of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study , 2008 .

[13]  Dana L. Brown,et al.  Domestic Institutions and Market Pressures as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility: Company Initiatives in Denmark and the UK , 2015 .

[14]  Robert W. Strand The Chief Officer of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Study of Its Presence in Top Management Teams , 2013 .

[15]  Antonio Tencati,et al.  The government's role in promoting corporate responsibility: a comparative analysis of Italy and UK from the relational state perspective , 2006 .

[16]  G. Redding,et al.  The Spirits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Senior Executive Perceptions of the Role of the Firm in Society in Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, and the United States , 2012 .

[17]  Ø. Hagen,et al.  Do Socially Responsible Brands Lead to Socially Responsible Companies? Understanding Change in Expressive Organizations. , 2009 .

[18]  Sora Kim,et al.  What they can do versus how much they care Assessing corporate communication strategies on Fortune 500 web sites , 2010 .

[19]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[20]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis. , 1973 .

[21]  S. Sethi,et al.  From Implicit to Explicit CSR in a Scandinavian Context: The Cases of HÅG and Hydro , 2015 .

[22]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: a Multi-Level Theory of Social Change in Organizations , 2004 .

[23]  Atle Midttun,et al.  The Changing Role of Governments in Corporate Social Responsibility: Drivers and Responses , 2008 .

[24]  D. Jamali The CSR of MNC Subsidiaries in Developing Countries: Global, Local, Substantive or Diluted? , 2010 .

[25]  G. Ligeti,et al.  CSR Communication of Corporate Enterprises in Hungary , 2009 .

[26]  C. Adams,et al.  CORPORATE SOCIAL REPORTING PRACTICES IN WESTERN EUROPE: LEGITIMATING CORPORATE BEHAVIOUR?☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[27]  J. Lozano,et al.  Governments and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[28]  A. Muller Global Versus Local CSR Strategies , 2006 .

[29]  Stefanie Hiss From Implicit to Explicit Corporate Social Responsibility: Institutional Change as a Fight for Myths , 2009, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[30]  D. Siegel,et al.  Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability , 2011 .

[31]  J. Moon,et al.  'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[32]  Sebastian Koos The institutional embeddedness of social responsibility: a multilevel analysis of smaller firms' civic engagement in Western Europe , 2012 .

[33]  Antonio Argandoña,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: One Size Does Not Fit All. Collecting Evidence from Europe , 2009 .

[34]  B. Husted,et al.  Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches , 2006 .

[35]  M. Morsing,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies , 2006 .

[36]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Strengthening Stakeholder–Company Relationships Through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives , 2009 .

[37]  Halina Ward,et al.  Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: a baseline study , 2002 .

[38]  C. Oliver STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[39]  Daniel P. Kinderman,et al.  ‘Free Us Up So We Can Be Responsible!’ The Co-Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Neo-Liberalism in the UK, 1977-2010 , 2011 .

[40]  Maria Gjølberg The origin of corporate social responsibility: global forces or national legacies? , 2009 .

[41]  E. Deci Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. , 1971 .

[42]  Magnus Frostenson,et al.  Reconciling CSR with the Role of the Corporation in Welfare States: The Problematic Swedish Example , 2009 .

[43]  Atle Midttun,et al.  The political economy of CSR in Western Europe , 2006 .

[44]  A. Carroll,et al.  The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice , 2010 .

[45]  Markus A. Höllerer From Taken‐For‐Granted to Explicit Commitment: The Rise of CSR in a Corporatist Country , 2013 .

[46]  L. Fransen,et al.  The Embeddedness of Responsible Business Practice: Exploring the Interaction Between National-Institutional Environments and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2012, Journal of Business Ethics.

[47]  Dirk M. Boehe,et al.  How do Leading Retail MNCs Leverage CSR Globally? Insights from Brazil , 2010 .

[48]  Tamyko Ysa,et al.  Public Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Governments in Europe , 2007 .

[49]  J. Moon,et al.  Institutional complementarity between corporate governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: a comparative institutional analysis of three capitalisms , 2012 .

[50]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2001 .

[52]  Shaun Williams Voluntary environmental and social accounting disclosure practices in the Asia-Pacific region , 1999 .

[53]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[54]  C. Higgins,et al.  Globalization and CSR in Asia , 2009 .

[55]  Xueming Luo,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value , 2006 .

[56]  Cheng-Chen Lin,et al.  Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: a GLOBE study of 15 countries , 2006, Journal of International Business Studies.

[57]  H. Davey,et al.  Understanding CSR in the Maldivian context , 2014 .

[58]  J. Moon,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and sustainability education: A trans-Atlantic comparison , 2011, Journal of Management & Organization.

[59]  T. Kostova,et al.  Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects , 2002 .

[60]  Susan Ariel Aaronson,et al.  Corporate Responsibility in the Global Village: The British Role Model and the American Laggard , 2003 .

[61]  Sumantra Ghoshal,et al.  Changing the Role of Top Management: Beyond Strategy to Purpose , 1994 .